Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Structure and function of the spermathecal complex in the phlebotomine sandflyPhlebotomus papatasi Scopoli (Diptera: Psychodidae): I. Ultrastructure and histology

  • Published:
Journal of Biosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Females of phlebotomine sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae) possess highly variable spermathecae that present several important taxonomic characters. The cause of this diversity remains a neglected field of sandfly biology, but may possibly be due to female post-mating sexual selection. To understand this diversity, a detailed study of the structure and function of the spermathecal complex in at least one of the species was a prerequisite. Using scanning and transmission electron microscopy, described here is ultrastructure of the spermathecal complex in the sand fly,Phlebotomus papatasi Scopoli. The spermathecal complexes are paired; each consists of a long spermathecal duct, a cylindrical spermathecal body, and a spherical spermathecal gland. Muscle fibres, nerves, tracheoles, and vascular sinuses connect the spermathecal body and duct through the epithelial layers. Spermathecal gland is formed by a typical insect epidermis and consisting of an epithelial layer of class-1 epidermal cells and elaborate glandular cells of class-3 epidermal cells, each having both receiving and conducting ductules (i.e. “end apparatus”) and a “cytological apodeme”, which is a newly described cell structure. The spermathecal body and duct are lined by class-1 epidermal cells and a cuticle, and are enveloped by a super-contracting visceral muscular system. The cuticle consists of rubber-like resilin, and its fibrillar arrangement and chemical nature are described. A well-developed neuromuscular junction exists between the spermathecal gland and the spermathecal body, which are connected to each other by a nerve and a muscle. The spermathecal complexes of the sandfly are compared with those of other insect species. The physiological role and possible evolutionary significance of the different parts of spermathecal complex in the sandfly are inferred from the morphology and behaviour. Post-mating sexual selection may be responsible for the structural uniqueness of the spermathecal complex in phlebotomine sandflies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnqvist G M, Edvardsson U and Friberg Nilsson T 2000 Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects;Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97 10460–10464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clements A N and Potter S A 1967 The fine structure of spermathecae and their ducts in the mosquito,Aedes aegypti;J. Insect Physiol. 13 1825–1836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dallai R 1975 Fine structure of the spermatheca ofApis mellifera;J. Insect Physiol. 21 89–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey K G and Webster G F 1967 The structure and secretion of the spermatheca ofRhodnius prolixus Stal: a histochemical study;Can. J. Zool. 45 653–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degrugillier M E and Leopold R 1976 Ultrastructure of sperm penetration of house fly eggs,Musca domestica;J. Ultrastruct. Res. 56 312–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard W G 1996Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice (Princeton: Priceton University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard W G 1998 Female roles in sperm competition; inSperm competition and sexual selection (eds) T R Birkhead and A P Moller (London: Academic Press) pp 91–116

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Edler H Y 1975 Muscle structure; inInsect muscle (ed.) P N R Usherwood (London: Academic Press) pp 1–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Filosi M and Perotti M E 1975 Fine structure of the spermatheca ofDrosophila melanogaster Meig;J. Submicrosc. Cytolol. 7 259–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Filshie B K 1982 Fine structure of the cuticle of insects and other arthropods; inInsect ultrastrucutre (eds) R C King and H Akai (New York: Plenum Press) vol. 1, pp 281–312

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fristrom D K and Rickoll W L 1982 The morphogenesis of imaginal discs ofDrosophila; inInsect ultrastructure (eds) R C King and H Akai (New York: Plenum Press) vol. 1, pp 341–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz A and Turner F R 2002 A light and electron microscopic study of the spermathecae and ventral receptacle ofAnastrepha suspense (Diptera: Tephritidae) and implications in female influence of sperm storage;Arthrop. Struct. Dev. 30 292–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grodner M L 1978 Fine structure of the spermathecal gland of the cotton boll weevil,Anthonomus grandis Boheman (Coleoptera: Curculionidae);Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 8 51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta B L and Smith D S 1969 Fine structural organisation of the spermathecae in the cockroachPeriplaneta americana;Tissue Cell 1 295–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Happ G M and Happ C M 1970 Fine structure and histochemistry of the spermathecal gland in the meal worm beetle,Tenebrio molitor;Tissue Cell 2 443–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holland B and Rice W R 1998 Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistc seduction versus resistance;Evolution 52 1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilango K 2005 Structure and function of the spermathecal complex in the phlebotomine sandflyPhlebotomus papatasi Scopoli (Diptera: Psychodidae): II. Post-copulatory histophysiological changes during the gonotrophic cycle;J. Biosic. 30 733–747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ilango K 2004 Phylogeny of the Old World Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) with special reference to structural diversity of female spermathecae;Oriental Insects 38 419–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilango K and Lane R P 2000 Coadaptaion of male aedeagal filaments and female spermthecal ducts of the Old World Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae);J. Med. Entomol. 37 653–659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones C J and Fischman D A 1970 An electron microscope study of the spermathecal complex of virginAedes aegypti mosquitoes;J. Morphol. 12 293–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokwaro D E, Odiambo T R and Murthi J K 1981 Ultrastructural and histochemical study of the spermatheca of the tsetse,Glossina morsitans moristans;Insect Sci. Appl. 2 135–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Miya K 1982 Early embryogenesis ofBombyx mori; inInsect ultrastructure (eds) R C King and H Akai (New York: Plenum press) vol. 2, pp 49–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Neville A C 1970 Cuticle ultrastructure in relation to the whole insect; inInsect ultrastructure (ed.) A C Neville (Symposia of the Royal Entomological Society of London) vol. 5, pp 17–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Noirot C and Quennedey A 1974 Fine structure of insect epidermal glands;Annu. Rev. Entomol. 19 61–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noirot C and Quennedey A 1991 Glands, gland cells, glandular units: Some comments on terminology and classification;Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fran. 27 123–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne M P 1975 The ultrastrucutre of nerve-muscle synapses; inInsect muscle (ed.) P N R Usherwood (London: Academic Press) pp 151–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker G A 1970 Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects;Biol. Rev. 45 525–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitnick S, Markow T and Spicer G S 1999 Evolution of multiple kinds of female sperm-storage organs inDrosophila;Evolution 53 1804–1822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitnick S and Brown W D 2000 Criteria for demonstrating female sperm choice;Evolution 54 1052–1056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rice M J 1970 Supercontracting and non-supercontrating visceral muscles in the tsetse fly,Glossina austeni;J. Insect Physiol. 16 1109–1122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ridely M 1989 The incidedence of sperm displacement in insects: four conjectures, one corroboration;Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 38 349–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudall K M 1969 Chitin and its association with other molecules;J. Polym. Sci. Part C 28 83–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sareen M L, Gill A and Biswas S 1989 Electron microscopic and histochemical studies on the spermatheca of a syrphid fly,Eristalis tenax (Diptera: Syrphidae);Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. 55 97–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Satir P and Gilula N B 1973 The fine structure of membranes and intercellular communication in insects;Annu. Rev. Entomol. 18 143–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Theodor O 1965 On the classification American Phlebotominae;J. Med. Entomol. 2 171–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tombes A S 1976 Myoneural junctions and neurosecretory endings on spermathecal muscle fibers of two weevils,Sitophilus granarius andHypera postica;J. Insect Physiol. 22 1573–1580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tombes A S and Roppel RM 1971 Scanning electron microscopy of the spermatheca inSitophilus granaries;Tissue Cell 3 551–556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tombes A S and Roppel R M 1972 Ultrastructure of spermatheca of the granary weevil,Sitophilus granarius (Coeoptera: Curculionidae);Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 1 141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villavaso E J 1975a Function of the spermathecal muscle of the boll weevilAnthonomus grandis;J. Insect Physiol. 21 1275–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villavaso E J 1975b The role of the spermathecal gland of the boll weevilAnthonomus grandis;J. Insect Physiol. 21 1457–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker W F 1980 Sperm utilization strategies in nonsocial insects;Am. Nat. 115 780–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, UK

    K. Ilango

  2. Zoological Survey of India, Southern Regional Station, 130 Santhome High Road, 600 028, Chennai, India

    K. Ilango

Authors
  1. K. Ilango
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Ilango.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ilango, K. Structure and function of the spermathecal complex in the phlebotomine sandflyPhlebotomus papatasi Scopoli (Diptera: Psychodidae): I. Ultrastructure and histology. J. Biosci. 30, 711–731 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02703571

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02703571

Keywords

Search

Navigation