Skip to main content
Log in

Regulation and innovation in the chemical industry: A comparison of the EU, Japan and the USA

Réglementation et innovation dans l’industrie chimique: une comparaison de l’UE, du Japon et des États-Unis

Regulierung und Innovation in der chemischen Industrie: Ein Vergleich der EU, Japans und der USA

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Surface Coatings International Part B: Coatings Transactions

Summaries

This article focuses on three important policy issues related to innovation in the chemical industry. First, what are the structural differences between the notification systems for new chemical substances in the EU, Japan and the USA? Second, evaluation of the innovative performance of the chemical industries in these three regions. Third, determination of whether the differences observed can be attributed in part to the structural differences of the regulatory systems. The conclusions drawn are based on both a quantitative examination of the large and medium-sized stock-issuing companies of the industry, and on a qualitative analysis using the case study approach.

Résumé

Cet article porte principalement sur trois importantes questions de politique relatives à l’innovation dans l’industrie chimique. En premier lieu, un examination des différences de structure entre les systèmes de notification pour les nouveaux produits chimiques dans l’UE, au Japon et aux Etats Unis. En deuxième lieu, une évaluation de la performance innovative de l’industrie chimique dans ces trois régions. En troisième lieu, la détermination de si les différences observées peuvent être attribuées, en partie, aux différences de structure dans les systèmes de contrôle. Les conclusions tirées sont basées sur une examination quantitative des grandes et moyennes sociétés émettrices d’actions de l’industrie chimique aussi bien que sur une analyse qualitative qui utilise des études de cas.

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Beitrag werden drei zentrale Probleme der Chemikalienpolitik analysiert, die direkt und indirekt mit der Innovationsfähigkeit der chemischen Industrie zusammenhängen. Gestützt auf Ergebnisse eines internationalen Vergleichs der sehr unterschiedlichen Regulierung neuer chemischer Substanzen in der EU, in Japan und den USA werden Strukturunterschiede des Chemikalienrechts herausgearbeitet und untersucht, welche Auswirkungen des Chemikalienrechts im Innovationswettbewerb zu beobachten sind und welche Unterschiede in der Innovationsleistung auf Unterschiede in den Regulierungsansätzen zurückgeführt werden können.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fleischer M, S Kelm, D Palm and L Delgado (ed),Regulation and Innovation in the Chemical Industry, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), Publication EUR 19735 EN, Sevilla, 2000 (Internet: ftp://ftp.jrc.es/pub/EURdoc/eur19735en.pdf)

  2. Neven B, R Schubert and L Bontoux (ed),Comparison of Regulatory Requirements for the Notification of New Chemical Substances in the European Union, the USA and Japan, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), Publication EUR 18119 EN, Sevilla, 1998 (Internet: ftp://ftp.jrc.es/pub/EURdoc/eur18119en.pdf)

  3. Clarke E and H Motschi, ‘Regulatory and legislative aspects of relevance to high performance pigments: Europe’,High Performance Pigments, H M Smith (ed), 381–410 Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  4. Moore J, ‘Chemical control and new substances notification in Japan: A supplier’s view’, R Feierl (ed), 98–110, ChemCon ’98, Vienna Conference on International Chemical Regulations, Punkt Zwoelf Verlag, Wien, 1998

  5. Fitzpatrick H F and G C Merritt, ‘Regulatory affairs for high performance pigments: North America’,High Performance Pigment, H M Smith (ed), 363–97, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  6. European Commission, ‘Three-yearly report on the implementation of Directive 67/548/EEC on the Classification, Packaging and Labelling of Dangerous Substances, as amended by Directive 92/32/EEC’, Brussels, May 1998 (Internet: http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/dansub/3year_rep.pdf)

  7. Institute for Environment and Health (IEH), ‘Testing requirements for proposals under the EC White Paper’,Strategy for Future Chemicals Policy, IEH Web Report W6, Leicester, July 2001 (Internet: http://www.le.ac.uk/ieh/contact/contact.html)

  8. Albach H, D B Audretsch, M Fleischer, R Greb, E Höfs, L-H Röller and I Schulz, ‘Innovation in the European chemical industry’, Discussion Paper FS IV, 96–26, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, 1996 (Internet: http://skylla.wzberlin.de/pdf/1996/iv96-26.pdf)

  9. Hollins S M and R B Macrory,Impact of the Directive 67/548/EEC on Small & Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) with Reference to Specialist Chemical Companies, Imperical College Consultants Ltd, London, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  10. European Commission, ‘Strategy for a future chemicals policy’, White Paper: COM(2001), Brussels, 27th February 2001 (Internet: http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/chemicals/whitepaper.htm)

  11. OECD,Environmental Outlook for the Chemicals Industry, Paris, 2000 (Internet: http://www.oecd.org/ehs/)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Fleischer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fleischer, M. Regulation and innovation in the chemical industry: A comparison of the EU, Japan and the USA. Surface Coatings International Part B: Coatings Transactions 86, 21–29 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02699589

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02699589

Keywords

Navigation