Skip to main content
Log in

The community of those who have nothing in common: Education and the language of responsibility

  • Symposium
  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I explore different ways to understand the idea of community. Using the work of Alphonso Lingis, I make a distinction between the rational community and the community of those who have nothing in common. The latter community is the community in which we are all strangers for each other. I argue that the language of the latter community is the language of responsibility. It is this language that enables us to speak with our own, unique and individual voice. I argue that education and educators should be concerned with the latter form of speaking. Therefore, the community without community, which exists as the interruption of the rational community, is the most important, and ultimately the only relevant educational community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apple, M. W. (1979).Ideology and curriculum. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. (1977).Interests and the growth of knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, C. (1984).Beyond the present and the particular: A theory of liberal education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1993).Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2000).The Bauman reader (P. Beilharz, Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R.J. (1983).Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J. (1995). Postmodernism and the repoliticization of education.Interchange,26, 161–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J. (1998). Pedagogy without humanism: Foucault and the subject of education.Interchange,29(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J. (1999). Where are you? Where am I? Education, identity and the question of location. In C.A. Säfström (Ed.),Identity. Questioning the logic of identity within educational theory (pp. 21–45). Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J. (2001a). Why Dewey now?Zeitschrift für pädagogische Historiographie,7(2), 71–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J. (2001b). How difficult should education be?Educational Theory,51(4), 385–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J. (2002). How general canBildung be? Reflections on the future of a modern educational ideal.British Journal of Philosophy of Education,36(3), 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J. (2003). Demokrati — ett problem för utbildning eller ett utbildningsproblem?Utbildning & Demokrati,12, 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J. (2004). Education, accountability and the ethical demand. Can the democratic potential of accountability be regained?Educational Theory,54(3), 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J. & Burbules, N.C. (2003).Pragmatism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G.J.J., & Egéa-Kuehne, D. (Eds.). (2001).Derrida & education. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. (1976).Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1984). Deconstruction and the other. An interview with Jacques Derrida. In R. Kearney (Ed.),Dialogues with contemporary continental thinkers (pp. 105–126). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1992). Force of law: The ‘mystical foundation of authority.’ In D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld, & D. G. Carlson (Eds.),Deconstruction and the possibility of justice (pp. 3–67). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1997a). The Villanova roundtable. A conversation with Jacques Derrida. In J.D. Caputo (Ed.),Deconstruction in a nutshell (pp. 3–28). New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1997b).Politics of friendship. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1980).The quest for certainty. New York: Perigree Books (Original work published 1929)

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1966).Les mots et les choses. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gur Ze’ev, I. (2001). Philosophy of peace in a postmodern era.Educational Theory,51(3), 315–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingis, A. (1994).The community of those who have nothing in common. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rikowski, G. (1996). Left alone: End time for Marxist educational theory?British Journal of Sociology of Education,17(4), 415–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1980).Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Säfström, C.A. & Biesta, G.J.J. (2001). Learning democracy in a world of difference.The School Field,12(5/6), 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, R. & Edwards, R. (1994).Postmodernism and education. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biesta, G. The community of those who have nothing in common: Education and the language of responsibility. Interchange 35, 307–324 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02698880

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02698880

Keywords

Navigation