Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring adhesion to poly(olefins): The role of adhesion promoter and substrate

  • Technical Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Coatings Technology

Abstract

The use of thermoplastic poly(olefins) in the automotive industry continues to proliferate due to their decreased cost and weight and increased recyclability in comparison to thermoplastics such as poly(carbonate) alloys or poly(urethanes). An attribute that continues to hamper the widespread introduction of thermoplasticpoly(olefins), in particular thermoplastic olefin (TPO, a blend of impact copolymer and elastomer), into additional automotive components, however, is its poor surface wettability and adhesion. Adhesion promoter formulation, both in terms of resin composition and solvent variation, has been known to influence the adhesive propensity of topcoats when analyzed by typical tests such as peel strength. It has long been disputed, however, that peel strength is not a true measure of paint adhesion since it artificially introduces a film between the paint and the adhesion promoter to enable one to perform the test. In contrast, this paper discusses the use of a newly developed in-situ adhesion test, described as compressive shear delamination (CSD), to quantify the adhesive/cohesive propensity of coatings to a variety of TPO substrates. The effect of solvent type and chlorinated poly(olefin) (CPO) adhesion promoting resin on the adhesion/cohesion of topcoats to TPO is described. Chlorinated poly(olefin) type, followed by solvent variation, was shown to have the most significant impact on the adhesion/cohesion of topcoats. This newly described CSD protocol for determining the weak link in painted plastic may have a significant impact on the choice of topcoat, adhesion promoting primer formulation, and substrate in particular automotive applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Plastics Engineering, Society of Plastics Engineering, INc., Brookfield, CT, November 1999.

  2. Ryntz, R.A.,J. Vinyl and Additive Tech., 3, 4, 295 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Morris, H.R., Turner, J.F., Munro, B., Ryntz, R.A., and Treado, P.J.,Langmuir, 15, 2961 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pennington, B.D., Ryntz, R.A., and Urban, M.W.,Polymer, 40, 4795 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fujiyama, M. and Kimura, S.Obunsha Robunshu, Eng. Ed., 4, 10, 777 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clemens, R.J., Batts, G.N., Lawniczak, J.E., Middleton, K.P., and Saas, C.,Proc. XIXth Conf. Org. Coat. Sci. Tech., p. 105, Athens, Greece, 1993.

  7. Prater, T.J., Kaberline, S.L., Holubka, J.W., and Ryntz, R.A., “Examination of the Distribution of TPO Adhesion Promoter Material in a Painted TPO System,”Journal of Coatings Technology, 68, No. 857, 83 (1996).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Morris, H.R., Munro, B., Ryntz, R.A., and Treado, P.J.,Langmuir, 14, 9, 2426 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mirabella, F.M., Dioh, N., and Zimba, C.G.,Proc. SPE Automotive TPO Global Conference, p. 183, Troy, MI, 1999.

  10. Templeton, L. and Eagan, R.Proc. Sixth International TPOs in Automotive 1999 Conference, Novi, MI, 1999.

  11. Fujimoto, F.,Paint and Resin, February, 36 (1986).

  12. Ryntz, R.A., Xie, Q., and Ramamurthy, A.C., “The Effects of Coating Solvents on the Morphology of Thermoplastic Polyolefins (TPO),”Journal of Coatings Technology, 67, No. 843, 45 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ryntz, R.A. and Mihora, D.M., “SAE Technical Paper #1999-01-1205,” SAE International, Warrendale, PA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dioh, N.,Proc. SPE Automotive TPO Global Conference 1999, p. 165, Troy, MI, 1999.

  15. Tang, H.T., Foran, B., and Martin, D.,Polymer Eng. Sci., 2000 (in press).

  16. Cremers, J., “DSM Mechanical Peel Tests,”Proc. Second International Coatings for Plastics Symposium, May 24–26, Troy, MI, 1999.

  17. Ryntz, R.A., “Attaining Adhesion/Cohesion Within Painted PLastics,”Proc. First International Coatings for Plastics Symposium, June 8–10, Troy, MI, 1998.

  18. Gregorovich, B.V. and McGonigal, P.J.,Proc. Adv. Coat. Tech. Conf., Chicago, IL, November 1992.

  19. Ryntz, R.A., Ramamurthy, A.C., and Mihora, D.J., “Thermal and Impact Induced Stress Failure in Painted TPO: The Role of Surface Morphology,”Journal of Coatings Technology, 67, No. 840, 35 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ryntz, R.A., Everson, M., and Pollano, G.P.,Prog. Org. Coat., 31, 4, 281 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ryntz, R.A., Abell, B.D., Pollano, G.P., Nguyen, L., and Shen, W.C.,Proc. 26th Annual Waterborne, Higher Solids, and Powder Coating Symposium, p. 474, New Orleans, LA, 1999.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dearborn, MI 48121

Santa Barbara, CA

Evansville, IN

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ryntz, R.A., Britz, D., Mihora, D.M. et al. Measuring adhesion to poly(olefins): The role of adhesion promoter and substrate. Journal of Coatings Technology 73, 107–115 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02697995

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02697995

Keywords

Navigation