Abstract
One characteristic of feminist scholarship is the attention paid to the lost history of women in a wide variety of arenas. This interest stems from the insight that history is a social construction. As such, it is likely influenced by sexist assumptions. This train of thought led to the author’s interest in the possibility that sexism had biased both the opportunities for women in the past and the way the history of sociology had been conceived. This article describes an effort to explore these questions in an undergraduate research seminar. The article describes a variety of means the author used to unveil these problems with her students, and to engage them in asking new questions, reading standard sociological materials in critical ways, and working toward the creation of a less biased understanding of the history of sociology. The reactions of the students and professor, and the products of this course are specified. This course is one of many examples of the way feminist questions and perspectives have the potential for transforming sociology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abir-Am, Pnina and Dorinda Outram (eds.). 1987.Uneasy Careers and Intimate Lives: Women in Science, 1789–1979. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Coser, Lewis (ed.). 1980.The Pleasures of Sociology. New York: New American Library.
Deegan, Mary Jo. 1988.Jane Addams and the Men of the Chicago School, 1892–1918 (New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books.
—. 1988b. “Transcending a Patriarchal Past: Teaching the History of Women in Sociology,”Teaching Sociology 16 (April):141–50.
—. (Forthcoming) Women in Sociology: A Bio-Bibliographic Sourcebook. Westport, CN: Greenwood Press.
di Leonardo, Micaela. 1985. “Warrior Virgins and Boston Marriages: Spinsterhood in History and Culture,”Feminist Issues, Fall 1985, pp. 47–68.
Gacs, Ute, Aisha Khan, Jerrie McIntyre and Ruth Weinberg (eds.). 1988.Women Anthropologists: A Biographical Dictionary. Westport, CN: Greenwood Press.
Giddings, Paula. 1984.When and Where I Enter ... The Impact of Black Women on Race and Sex in America. New York: William Morrow and Company.
Newman, Michelle (ed.). 1985.Men’s Ideas/Women’s Realities: Popular Science, 1870–1915. New York: Pergamon Press.
Pichanick, Valerie. 1980.Harriet Martineau: The Woman and her Work, 1802–76. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Reinharz, Shulamit. 1985. “Feminist Distrust: Problems of Context and Content in Sociological Work,” pp. 153–72 in David Berg and Ken Smith, eds.,Exploring Clinical Methods in Social Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Republished asThe Self in Social Inquiry: Researching Methods. Berely Hills, CA: Sage, 1988, pp. 153–172.
—. 1986. “Patriarchal Pontifications,”Society, 23 (6) 23–29.
Reinharz, Shulamit and Peter Conrad (eds.). 1984.Qualitative Sociology in International Perspective, a special issue ofQualitative Sociology, 1988, volume 11, numbers 1 & 2.
Riley, Mathilda White. 1988.Sociological Lives. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Rosenberg, Rosalind. 1982.Beyond Separate Spheres: Intellectual Roots of Modern Feminism. New York: Yale University Press.
Sicherman, Barbara and Carol Hurd Green (eds.). 1980.Notable American Women: The Modern Period. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Walker, Alice (ed.). 1979.I Love Myself when I am Laughing ... A Zora Neale Hurston Reader. New York: The Feminist Press.
Yates, Gayle Graham (ed.).Harriet Martineau on Women. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Shulamit Reinharz is an associate professor of society at Brandies University and the author ofOn Becoming a Social Scientist (Transaction 1984). Her recent articles in feminist sociology focus on such areas as the meaning of miscarriage, the integration of gerontological and feminist theory, an analysis of the ideology of socialist Zionist feminist, Manya Wilbushewitz Shohat, and an overview of the work of Mirra Komarovsky.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reinharz, S. Teaching the history of women in sociology: Or Dorothy Swaine Thomas, wasn’t she the woman married to William I.?. Am Soc 20, 87–94 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02697789
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02697789