References
Algemene Rekenkamer. (1987).Handleiding doelmatigheidsonderzoek. Den Haag.
Argyris, C., & Shon, D. (1976).Theory in practice. London: Tavistock Publications.
Blume, S. (1977). Policy as theory.Acta Sociologica, 20, 247–262.
Chen, H. T. (1990).Theory-driven evaluations. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Cooper, H. M. (1984).The integrative research review: A systematic approach. London, Sage.
Cordray, D. S., & Lipsey, M. W. (1987).Evaluation studies review annual (vol. 11). London: Sage.
Dunn, W. N. (1981).Public policy analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Dunn, W. N. (1988). Justifying policy arguments: Criteria for practical discourse.Evaluation and Program Planning.
Dunn, W. N. (1988a). Methods of the second type: Coping with the wilderness of conventional policy analysis.Policy Studies Review.
Dunn, W. N., & Holzner, B. (1982).Methodological research on knowledge use and school improvement, Final Report. Washington, DC.: Department of Education.
Dunn, W. N., & Holzner, B. (1988). Knowledge in society. Anatomy of an emergent field.Knowledge in Society, 1, 5–26.
Freeman, H., & Sherwood, C. (1970).Social research and social policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
General Accounting Office. (1986).Teenage pregnancy: 500,000 births a year but a few tested programs. Program Evaluation and Methodology division GAO: Washington, DC.
General Accounting Office. (1991).Prospective evaluation methods: the prospective evaluation synthesis. Methodology Transfer Paper 10.1.10, Washington, DC.
Glaser, E. M., Abelson, H. H., & Garrison, K. N. (1983).Putting knowledge to use. San Francisco: CRUSK.
Hambrick, R. (1974). A guide to the analysis of policy arguments.Policy Sciences, 5, 469–478.
Havelock, R. G. (1973).Planning for innovation. Ann Arbor: CRUSK.
Hirschi, T. (1969).Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: UC Press.
Hoeven, E. van der (1987). Maatschappelijke bindingen van jongeren en veel voorkomende criminaliteit: het bereik van de sociale controletheorie,Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 29, 251–234.
Hoeven, E. van der, Leeuw, F. L., & Wintels, P. (1989).Belangrijkste resultaten van een ‘standvan-zaken’ studie naar het empirisch gehalte van een beleidstheorie. Rapport: LISBON.
Junger-Tas, J. (1988).De sociale controletheorie en de preventie van jeugdcriminaliteit, Paper, SIGO-Conferentie’ Jeugddelinquentie’. University of Wageningen: Wageningen (April 22).
Junger-Tas, J., & Block, R. L. (Eds.) (1988).Juvenile delinquency in the Netherlands. Berkeley: Kugel Publishers.
Latour, B., & Woolgard, S. (1979).Laboratory life. London: Sage.
Leeuw, F. L. (1983).Overheid en bevolkingsgroei; evaluatie van beleidstheorieen. Doctoral thesis. University of Leiden, Leiden.
Leeuw, F. L. (1985). Population policy in industralized countries: Evaluating policy theories to assess the demographic impact of population policy.Genus, 46, 1–19.
Leeuw, F. L. (1989). Beleidstheorieen: Veronderstellingen achter beleid. In A. Hoogerwerf (Ed.),Overheidsbeleid. Alphen aan de Rijn: Samson, hoofdstuk 6.
Leeuw, F. L. (in press). Analzying policy theories and the systematic use of knowledge for public policy. In T. A. Barker & B. G. Peters (Eds.),Advising West European governments: Inquiries, expertise and public policy (Vol. I). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Leeuw, F. L. et al. (Eds.). (1989).Sociale bindingen van jongeren, kleine criminaliteit en beleid.
Majone, G. (1980). Policies as theories.The International Journal of Management Science, 8, 151–162.
Mason, R. O., & Mitroff, I. I. (1981).Challenging strategic planning assumptions. New York: Wiley Interscience.
Mazis, M., Settle, R., & Leslie, D. C. (1973). Elimination of phosphate detergents and psychological reactance.Journal of Marketing Research, 10, 390–395.
McDonnell, L. M., & Elmore, R. F. (1987). Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 133–152.
Mitroff, I. I., & Emshoff, J. R. (1979). On strategic assumption-making: A dialectical approach to policy and planning.Academy of Management Review, 4, 1–12.
Roethof Committee. (1984). 1986Interim-& Eindrapport Commissie Kleine Criminaliteit. Den Haag: SDU.
Rogers, E. M. (1983).Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
Rook, A., & Leeuwenburg, J. W. (Ed.) (1991).Eindrapport Stuurgroep Bestuurlijke preventie van criminaliteit. Den Haag: SDU.
Rossi, P., & Wright, J. D. (1984). Evaluation research, an assessment.Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 331–352.
Schon, D. A. (1986).The reflexive practitioner. Belmond: Belmond Press.
Standpunt Regering. (1991). Inzake heteindrapport van de Stuurgroep Bestuurlijke Preventie van Criminaliteit, Tweede Kamer, vergaderjaar 1991–1992, 22 300 VI, nr. 4 (September 18).
Suchman, E. A. (1967).Evaluative research, principles ad practice in public service and social programs. New York: Russel/Sage.
Toulmin, S. (1958).The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van de Vall, M., & Ulrich, H. J. (1986). Trends in data-based sociological practice: Towards a professional paradigm?Knowledge, 8, 167–184.
Weiss, C., & Bucuvalas, M. J. (1980).Social science research an decision making. New York: Free Press.
Zaltman, G. R., et al. (Eds.). (1981).Theory construction in marketing. New York: Wiley Interscience.
Zhang, X. (1986).The core scholars and literature in studies of knowledge use: A citation analysis. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Sociology, Pittsburgh.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Frans L. Leeuw (Ph.D. in Sociology) currently is Director of The Netherlands’ Court of Audit Department of Policy Evaluation. He also holds the chair of Professor of Policy Effectiveness Research at Utrecht University. Recent publications on policy theories, similarities and dissimilarities of auditing and evaluation research and on the utilization of policy research by government officials.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leeuw, F.L. Policy theories, knowledge utilization, and evaluation. Knowledge and Policy 4, 73–91 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02693089
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02693089