Skip to main content
Log in

The evolution of female sexuality and mate selection in humans

  • Published:
Human Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding female sexuality and mate choice is central to evolutionary scenarios of human social systems. Studies of female sexuality conducted by sex researchers in the United States since 1938 indicate that human females in general are concerned with their sexual well-being and are capable of sexual response parallel to that of males. Across cultures in general and in western societies in particular, females engage in extramarital affairs regularly, regardless of punishment by males or social disapproval. Families are usually concerned with marriage arrangements only insofar as those arrangements are economically or politically advantageous, but females most often have a voice in arranged marriages. Extended families also concentrate on a couple’s future reproduction rather than on sexual exclusivity. Although marriage for females is often compromised by male or family reproductive interests (which may not in fact differ from female interests), females appear to exercise their sexuality with more freedom than has previously been suggested. Notions of human females as pawns in the male reproductive game, or as traders of sex for male services, should be dispelled.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, D. B., A. R. Gould, and A. D. Burt 1978 Rise in Female-initiated Sexual Activity at Ovulation and Its Suppression by Oral Contraceptives.New England Journal of Medicine 299:1145–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R. D., and K. M. Noonan 1979 Concealment of Ovulation, Parental Care, and Human Social Evolution. InEvolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior, N. A. Chagnon and W. G. Irons, eds. Pp. 436–453. North Scituate, Massachusetts: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batten, Mary 1991Choices and Strategies: The Female’s Role in Evolution, in press.

  • Beach, F. 1976 Sexual Attractivity, Proceptivity, and Receptivity in Female Mammals.Archives of Sexual Behavior 14:529–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betzig, L. 1986Despotism and Differential Reproduction: A Darwinian View of History. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1988 Mating and Parenting in Darwinian Perspective. InHuman Reproductive Behavior, L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder, and P. Turke, eds. Pp. 3–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaffer Hrdy, S. 1979 The Evolution of Human Sexuality: The Latest Word and the Last.Quarterly Review of Biology 54:309–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1981The Woman That Never Evolved. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 Heat: The Absence of Estrus Reflects a Change in Sexual Strategy.Science ’83 4(8):72–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaffer Hrdy, S., and P. L. Whitten 1986 Patterning of Sexual Activity. InPrimate Societies, B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, and T. T. Strusaker, eds. Pp. 370–384. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgerhoff Mulder, M. 1989 Marital Status and Reproductive Performance in Kipsigis Women: Reevaluating the Polygyny-fertility Hypothesis.Population Studies 43:285–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1990 Kipsigis Women’s Preference for Wealthy Men: Evidence for Female Choice in Mammals?Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 27:255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1992 Women’s Strategies in Polygynous Marriage: Kipsigis, Datoga, and Other East African Cases.Human Nature 3:45–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broude, G. J. 1980 Extra-marital Sex Norms in Cross-Cultural Perspective.Behavior Science Research 15:181–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broude, G. J., and S. J. Greene 1976 Cross-cultural Codes on Twenty Sexual Attitudes and Practices.Ethnology 60:409–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burley, N. 1979 The Evolution of Concealed Ovulation.American Naturalist 114:835–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. 1985 Human Mate Selection.American Scientist 73:47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1986 Sex Differences in Human Mate Choice Criteria: An Evolutionary Perspective. InSociobiology and Psychology: Ideas, Issues and Applications, C. Crawford, M. Smith, and D. Krebs, eds. Pp. 335–351. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Emilio, J., and E. B. Freedman 1988Intimate Matters: A History of Sexuality in America. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., and M. Wilson 1978Sex, Evolution, and Behavior. North Scituate, Massachusetts: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1988Homicide. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1859The Origin of Species. London: J. Murray and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1871The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: J. Murray and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickemann, M. 1979 The Ecology of Mating Systems in Hypergynous Dowery Societies.Social Science Information 18:163–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essock-Vitale, S. M. 1984 The Reproductive Success of Wealthy Americans.Ethology and Sociobiology 5:45–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essock-Vitale, S. M., and M. T. McGuire 1985 Women’s Lives Viewed from an Evolutionary Perspective, I. Sexual Histories, Reproductive Success and Demographic Characteristics of a Random Sample of American Women.Ethology and Sociobiology 6:137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedigan, L. M. 1986 The Changing Role of Women in Models of Human Evolution.Annual Review of Anthropology 15:25–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flinn, M. V. 1986 Correlates of Reproductive Success in a Caribbean Village.Human Ecology 14:225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, C. S., and F. A. Beach 1951Patterns of Sexual Behavior. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frayser, S. G. 1985Varieties of Sexual Experience: An Anthropological Perspective on Human Sexuality. New Haven: HRAF Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhard, P. 1971 Human Sexual Behavior. InHuman Sexual Behavior: Variation Across the Ethnographic Spectrum, D. S. Marshall and R. C. Suggs, eds. Pp. 206–217. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhard, P. H., and A. B. Johnson 1979The Kinsey Data: Marginal Tabulations of the 1938–1963 Interviews Conducted by the Institute for Sex Research. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goethals, G. W. 1971 Factors Affecting Permission and Nonpermission Rules Regarding Premarital Sex. InSociology of Sex, J. M. Henslin, ed. Pp. 9–26. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, J. 1986The Chimpanzees of Gombe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Cynthia A. 1991 Menstrual Synchrony: An Update and Review.Human Nature 2:293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregor, T. 1985Anxious Pleasures: The Sexual Lives of an Amazonian People. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hite, S. 1976The Hite Report. New York: Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, M. 1969The Affair. New York: World Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irons, W. G. 1979 Cultural and Biological Success. InEvolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior, N. A. Chagnon and W. G. Irons, eds. Pp. 257–273. North Scituate, Massachusetts: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1980 Is Yomut Social Behavior Adaptive? InSociobiology: Beyond Nature/Nurture?, C. W. Barlow and J. Silverberg, eds. Pp. 417–463. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 Human Female Reproductive Strategies. InSocial Behavior of Female Vertebrates, S. W. Wasser, ed. Pp. 169–213. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. E. 1970 Some Correlates of Extramarital Coitus.Journal of Marriage and the Family 32:449–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, J. A. 1973 Sexuality of Pregnant and Breastfeeding Women.Archives of Sexual Behavior 2:215–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., W. B. Pomeroy, C. E. Martin, and P. H. Gebhard 1953Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, J. B., and C. S. Lancaster 1983 Parental Investment: The Hominid Adaptation. InHow Humans Adapt, D. J. Ortner, ed. Pp. 33–65. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, O. 1981 The Origin of Man.Science 211:341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, W. H., and V. E. Johnson 1965a The Sexual Response Cycle of the Human Female, I. Gross Anatomical Considerations. InSex Research: New Developments, J. Money, ed. Pp. 53–89. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1965b The Sexual Response Cycle of the Human Female, II. The Clitoris: Anatomic and Clinical Considerations. InSex Research: New Developments, J. Money, ed. Pp. 90–104. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, M. 1971 Menstrual Synchrony and Suppression.Nature 229:244–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G. P., and D. R. White 1969 Standard Cross-cultural Sample.Ethnology 8:329–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. A. 1970 Sperm Competition and Its Evolutionary Consequences.Quarterly Biological Review 45:525–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1982 Why Are There So Many Tiny Sperm? Sperm Competition and the Maintenance of Two Sexes.Journal of Theoretical Biology 96:281–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1984 Sperm Competition. InSperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems, R. L. Smith, ed. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, P. C., and R. M. Anderson 1981 Human Sexuality in Cross-cultural Perspective. InThe Bases of Human Sexual Attraction, M. Cook, ed. Pp. 215–250. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, P. C., and P. C. Cozby 1972 Courtship Patterns Associated with Freedom of Choice of Spouse.Journal of Marriage and the Family 34:689–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, M. J., G. M. Switz, and K. Thompson 1980 Olfactory Influences on the Human Menstrual Cycle.Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 13:737–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherfey, M. J. 1966The Nature and Evolution of Female Sexuality. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, R. V. 1976 The Evolution of Human Reproduction.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B 195:3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1984 The Role of Hormones in Sexual Cycles. InHormones in Reproduction, vol. 3, C. R. Austin and R. V. Short, eds. Pp. 42–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. F. 1988 Female Primate Sexual Behavior and Conception: Are There Really Sperm to Spare?Current Anthropology 29:81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1989a Female Choice in Nonhuman Primates.Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 32:103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1989b Aberrant Sperm and the Evolution of Human Mating Patterns.Animal Behavior 38:544–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. F., and R. Palombit 1991 Female Choice Is Not Always Sexual Selection. Ms. in preparation.

  • Strassmann, B. I. 1981 Sexual Selection, Paternal Care and Concealed Ovulation in Humans.Ethology and Sociobiology 2:31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. 1979The Evolution of Human Sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavris, C., and S. Sadd 1975The Redbook Report on Female Sexuality. New York: Delacorte Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. 1972 Parental Investment and Sexual Selection. InSexual Selection and the Descent of Man, B. Campbell, ed. Pp. 1136–1179. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turke, P. W. 1984 Effects of Ovulatory Concealment and Synchrony of Protohominid Mating Systems and Parental Roles.Ethology and Sociobiology 5:33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turke, P. W., and L. L. Betzig 1985 Those Who Can, Do: Wealth, Status and Reproduction on Ifaluk.Ethology and Sociobiology 6:79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tutin, C. 1979 Mating Patterns and Reproductive Strategies in a Community of Wild Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii).Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 6:29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udry, J. B., N. M. Morris, and L. Walker 1973 Effect of Contraceptive Pills on Sexual Activity in the Luteal Phase of the Human Menstrual Cycle.Archives of Sexual Behavior 2:205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veith, J. L., M. Buck, S. Getzlaf, P. Van Dalfsen, and S. Slade 1983 Exposure to Men Influences the Occurrence of Ovulation in Women.Physiology and Behavior 31:313–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vining, D. R. 1986 Social versus Reproductive Success: The Central Theoretical Problem of Human Sociobiology.Brain and Behavioral Sciences 9:167–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, M. K. 1978 Cross-cultural Codes Dealing with the Relative Status of Women.Ethnology 17:211–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, L. D. 1991 Human Evolution and the Sexual Behavior of Female Primates. InUnderstanding Behavior, J. D. Loy and C. B. Peters, eds. Pp. 121–151. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Meredith F. Small is associate professor of anthropology at Cornell University. For the past 14 years she has studied reproductive biology and mating behavior in three species of macaques. Most recently, she worked with captive Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus), reportedly the most promiscuous primate. Her most recent articles include “Promiscuity in Barbary Macaques” (American Journal of Primatology 20:267–282, 1990), and “Alloparental Behavior in Barbary Macaques” (Animal Behavior 39:297–306, 1990). She is currently working on a book on female choice for Cornell University Press.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Small, M.F. The evolution of female sexuality and mate selection in humans. Human Nature 3, 133–156 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692250

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692250

Key words

Navigation