Skip to main content
Log in

Bridging the donor-decentralization gap: Rethinking incentives and institutional impacts in control-oriented bureaucracies

  • Development Policy
  • Published:
Studies In Comparative International Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some important studies suggest that the organizational imperatives of donor agencies explain the tendency of foreign aid to reinforce institutional centralization rather than to support the development of decentralized institutions in recipient countries. This article shows that certain design features of two decentralized USAID projects completed in Peru during the 1980s facilitated achieving donor objectives, decentralized institutional development, and national-level reforms favoring decentralization. Analysis of this experience reveals that these design features reduced the costs and increased the benefits of decentralized implementation for the donor, while allowing synergies between implementation and institution building to be exploited. Indeed, in the context of Peru’s highly centralized, control-oriented public sector, bypass mechanisms traditionally used by donors to expedite implementation and insulate projects from uncertainty also generally enhanced the development of decentralized institutions. The lessons distilled in this case study have broad relevance since the sorts of administrative obstacles encountered by USAID in Peru—excessive centralization, disbursement bottlenecks, and onerous bureaucratic controls—are all too frequently found in other developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ALDRICH, HOWARD E. 1979Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • AYRES, ROBERT L. 1984Banking on the poor: The World Bank and world poverty. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRYANT, CORALIE 1979 Organizational impediments to making participation a reality: ‘Swimming Upstream’ in AID.Rural Development Participation Review (Spring):8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHAMBERS, ROBERT 1978 Project selection for poverty-focused rural development: Simple is optimal.World Development 6:209–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CHECCHI AND COMPANY CONSULTING, INC. 1987 Evaluation of the Peruvian flood/drought rehabilitation and construction program 1983–1987. Final report. Washington, D.C.

  • CHEEMA, G. SHABBIR AND DENNIS A. RONDINELLI, eds. 1983Decentralization and development. Policy implementation in developing countries. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHETWYND, ERIC, J. HATCH, L. HAMMERGREN, R. JOHNSON, D. RONDINELLI and P.W. SALINAS 1985 Integrated regional development: Final evaluation. Lima: AID/Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  • DE SOTO, HERNANDO 1987The other path: The invisible revolution in the Third World. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • EXPRESO 1993 Primer anteproyecto: Nueva Constitución del Perú, Texto íntegro publicado enEl Peruano el 20 de mayo de 1993. Special Supplement, n.d., p. 7.

  • FRANCO TEMPLE, IGNACIO 1986 Algunos problemas cuyas soluciones están fuera del alcance de las Corporaciones Departmentales de Desarrollo y que han obstaculizado su gestión. Lima: AID/Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRENCH, JEROME, M. LINDENBURG, F.J. GOMEZ, L. MANN, A. AUSTIN, J. BAANANTE, J. HATCH, A. LANAO, W. CORNEJO, and A. ARCE 1983 Evoluation of the integrated regional development project. Lima: AID/Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  • GALL, PIRIE M. 1983Local government trends and performance: Assessment of AID’s involvement in Latin America. A.I.D. Evaluation Special Study, no. 17. Washington, D.C.

  • GAO (UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE) 1986Time-critical aid: Disaster reconstruction assistance—a better delivery system is needed. GAO/NSIAD-87-1. Washington, DC.

  • GOW, DAVID D. and VANSANT, JERRY 1985 Decentralization and participation: Concepts in need of implementation strategies. InImplementing rural development projects. Lessons from AID and World Bank experiences, edited by Elliott R. Morss and David D. Gow, 107–147. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HATCH, JOHN K., A. LANAO FLORES, W. CORNEJO, R. ARCE, and J. ARCE 1985 An evaluation of rural development projects in the Departments of Cajamarca and Junín-Peru: Their cost effectiveness and community impact. Bethesda, MD: Rural Development Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • HONADLE, GEORGE H. and JERRY VANSANT 1985Implementation for sustainability: Lessons from integrated rural development. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISRAEL, ARTURO 1987Institutional development. Incentives to performance. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1994 Dealing with gaps in public sector performance: Institutional development experience of the World Bank. InPuzzles of productivity in public organizations, edited by Norman Uphoff, 99–119. San Francisco: ICS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • JOHNSON, TWIG, L. HAMMERGREN, E. BERRY, R. LANDMANN, J. COHEN, and R. ADLER 1983The impact of PL 480 Title I in Peru: Food as an effective development resource. A.I.D. Project Impact Evaluation, no. 47. Washington, D.C.

  • KING, DWIGHT Y. 1982 Bilateral development assistance in Indonesia. Jakarta: American Embassy.

    Google Scholar 

  • KORTEN, DAVID C. 1980 Community organization and rural development: A learning process approach.Public Administration Review 40:480–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KORTEN, DAVID C. and NORMAN UPHOFF 1981Bureaucratic reorientation for participatory rural development. NASPAA Paper No. 1. Washington: National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • LELE, UMA 1975The design of rural development: Lessons from Africa. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEONARD, DAVID K. 1982a Analyzing the organizational requirements for serving the rural poor. InInstitutions of rural development for the poor: Decentralization and organizational linkages, edited by David K. Leonard and Dale Rogers Marshall, 1–39, Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1982b Choosing among forms of decentralization and linkage. InInstitutions of rural development for the poor: Decentralization and organizational linkages, edited by David K. Leonard and Dale Rogers Marshall, 193–226. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1983 Interorganizational linkages for decentralized rural development: Overcoming administrative weakness. InDecentralization and development: Policy implementation in developing countries, edited by G. Shabbir Cheema and Dennis A. Rondinelli, 271–293. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • LRAP (LOCAL REVENUE ADMINISTRATION PROJECT) 1984 Syracuse University technical assistance to the Integrated Regional Development Project (Peru) final report. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • MORGAN, E. PHILIP 1980 Managing development assistance: Some efforts with special attention to southern Africa.SADEX 2, 1: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1983 The project orthodoxy in development: Re-evaluating the cutting edge.Public Administration and Development 3: 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MORSS, ELIOTT R. and DAVID D. GOW 1985Implementing rural development projects: Lessons from AID and World Bank experiences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • RESUMEN SEMANAL 1993a El tema de la regionalización. No. 730, 4–10 August: 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1993b Nuevo proyecto: j24 regiones! No. 731, 11–17 August: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • RONDINELLI, DENNIS A. 1981 Government decentralization in comparative perspective: Theory and practice in developing countries.International Review of Administrative Science 47: 133–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1982 The dilemma of development administration: Complexity and uncertainty in controloriented bureaucracies.World Politics 35:43–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1983aDevelopment projects as policy experiments: An adaptive approach to development administration. New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1983b Implementing decentralization programmes in Asia: A comparative analysis.Public Administration and Development 3:181–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RONDINELLI, DENNIS A. and JOHN R. NELLIS 1986 Assessing decentralization policies in developing countries: The case for cautious optimism.Development Policy Review 4:3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • RONDINELLI, DENNIS A., JOHN R. NELLIS, and G. SHABBIR CHEEMA 1984Decentralization in developing countries: Review of recent experiences. World Bank Staff Working Papers, no. 581. Washington, D.C.

  • SCHMIDT, GREGORY D. 1989Donors and decentralization in developing countries: Insights from AID experience in Peru. Westview Special Studies in Social, Political, and Economic Development. Boulder, San Francisco, and London: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1991 Linking action training to bureaucratic reorientation and institutional reform.Public Administration and Development 11:39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1992 Beyond the conventional wisdom: USAID projects, interorganizational linkages, and institutional reform in Peru.The Journal of Developing Areas 26 (July): 431–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • SMITH, WILLIAM E., FRANCIS J. LETHEM, and BEN A. THOOLEN 1980The design of organizations for rural development projects: A progress report. World Bank Staff Working Paper, no. 375. Washington, D.C.

  • STRACHAN, HARRY W. 1978 Side-effects of planning in the aid control system.World Development 6:467–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TENDLER, JUDITH 1975Inside foreign aid. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME) 1993Human development report 1993. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UPHOFF, NORMAN 1986Local institutional development: An analytical sourcebook with cases. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1991 Fitting projects to people. InPutting people first: Sociological variables in rural development, 2d ed., edited by Michael Cernea, 467–511. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • VANSANT, JERRY and PAUL R. CRAWFORD 1985 Coping with political, economic, environmental, and institutional constraints. InImplementing rural development projects: Lessons from AID and World Bank experiences, edited by Elliott R. Morss and David D. Gow, 1–32. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory D. Schmidt.

Additional information

Gregory D. Schmidt is an associate professor of political science at Northern Illinois University and an associate ofSeguimiento, Análisis y Evaluación Para el Desarrollo (SASE), a Peruvian nongovernmental organization specializing in grassroots development. He is the author of a book and various journal articles on development issues, and of a forthcoming book on the 1990 Peruvian presidential election.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidt, G.D. Bridging the donor-decentralization gap: Rethinking incentives and institutional impacts in control-oriented bureaucracies. Studies in Comparative International Development 30, 59–83 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687154

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687154

Keywords

Navigation