Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Adapting to democracy: Societal mobilization and social policy in Taiwan and South Korea

  • Articles
  • Published:
Studies in Comparative International Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Democratic transition and institutional change do not necessarily guarantee greater political inclusion, particularly when it comes to the policy influence of civil society groups. Rather, political inclusiveness requires strategic adaptation among societal actors. Actors need to seize upon opportunities endemic to political change. This article provides a comparative analysis of health care reform in democratizing Taiwan and South Korea, focusing on two social movement coalitions, the National Health Insurance Coalition in Taiwan and Korea's Health Solidarity. Both movement coalitions were critical in shaping welfare reform trajectories in Taiwan and South Korea during the late 1990s, despite having been shut out from earlier episodes of health care reform. I argue that these groups (1) strategically adjusted their mobilization strategies to fit specific political and policy contexts, (2) benefited from broad-based coalition building, and (3) effectively framed the issue of social welfare in ways that gained these movements ideational leverage, which was particularly significant given the marginal place of leftist ideas in the postwar East Asian developmental state model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Academia Sinica. 1994.The 1994 Social Image Survey. Taipei: Sun Yat-Sen Institute, Academia Sinica [in Chinese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, Michael and William Coleman. 1992. “Policy Networks, Policy Communities and the Problems of Governance.”Governance 5: 154–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birdsall, Nancy. 1998. “Life is Unfair: Inequality in the World.”Foreign Policy 111: 76–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BNHI (Bureau of National Health Insurance). 2000.National Health Insurance Annual Statistical Report. Taipei: Bureau of National Health Insurance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, David and Jongryn Mo. 1992. “Electoral Systems and Institutional Choice: A Case Study of the 1988 Korean Elections.”Comparative Political Studies 24: 405–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulletin. 1999.The Bulletin of the Legislative Yuan, Health and Welfare Committee Report, September [in Chinese].

  • Chao, Linda and Ramon Myers. 1998.The First Chinese Democracy: Political Life in the Republic of China on Taiwan. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, Tung-Liang. 2000. “Taiwan's Universal Health Insurance: What has been Achieved? What Hasn't? And Where to go?” Paper presented at theInternational Symposium on National Health Insurance. Seoul, Korea, 9 June.

  • Chiang, Tung-Liang and Shou-Hsia Cheng. 1997. “The Effect of Universal Health Insurance on Health Care Utilization in Taiwan.”Journal of the American Medical Association 278: 89–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Hung-Jun. 2000. Interview by author, Health Solidarity, Seoul, 19 July.

  • Chu, Yin-Wah. 1998. “Labor and Democratization in South Korea and Taiwan.”Journal of Contemporary Asia 28: 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, Yun-Han. 1992.Crafting Democracy, in Taiwan. Taipei: Institute for National Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, James. 1997. “East Asian Democracy: Progress and Limits.” Pp. 95–122 inConsolidating the Third Wave Democracies: Regional Challenges, eds. Larry Diamond et al. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Bronwen and James Cotton. 1996. “New Social Movements and the Changing Nature of Political Opposition in South Korea.” Pp. 272–299 inPolitical Oppositions in Industrializing Asia, ed. Garry Rodan. London: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry. 1997. “Introduction: In Search of Consolidation.” Pp. xiii-1 inConsolidating the Third Wave Democracies: Themes and Perspectives, ed. Larry Diamond et al. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Palma, Giuseppe. 1990.To, Craft Democracies. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOH (Department of Health). 1997.National Health Insurance Two-Year Report. Taipei: Department of Health, Executive Yuan, Feb. [in Chinese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Encarnacion, Omar. 2001. “Labor and Pacted Democracy: Post-Franco Spain in Comparative Perspective.”Comparative Politics 33: 337–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Edward, ed. 1994.The Politics of Democratization: Generalizing East Asian Experiences. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, Thomas. 1996. “The Waning of the Kuomintang State on Taiwan.” Paper presented at theState and Society in East Asia Network Conference. Copenhagen, Denmark, September 27–29.

  • Goodman, Roger, et al., eds. 1998.The East Asian Welfare Model: Welfare Orientalism and Beyond. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter, ed. 1989.The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higley, John, Tong-Yi Huang and Tse-Min, Lin. 1998. “Elite Settlements in Taiwan.”Journal of Democracy 9: 148–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, Ian. 2000. “Productivist Welfare Capitalism: Social Policy in East Asia.”Political Studies 48: 706–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, John Fu-Sheng. 1996. “The SNTV System and Its Political Implications.” Pp. 193–212 inTaiwan's Electoral Politics and Democratic, Transition: Riding the Third Wave, ed. Tien Hung-Mao. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, Chia-Ching. 1999. Interview by author, Taipei Alliance for the Protection of Women's Rights, Taipei, 20 September.

  • Huber, Evelyne, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and John D. Stephens. 1999. “The Paradoxes of Contemporary Democracy: Formal, Participatory and Social Dimensions.” Pp. 168–192 inTransitions to Democracy, ed. Lisa Anderson. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapstein, Ethan and Michael Mandelbaum, eds. 1997.Sustaining the Transition: The Social Safety Net in Postcommunist Europe. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Andrew Eungi. 2001. “Citizens' Coalition Movement and the Consolidation of Democracy: 2000 General Elections in South Korea.”Journal of East Asian Studies, 1: 243–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Hee-Min. 1997. “Rational Choice Theory and Third World Politics: The 1990 Party Merger in Korea.”Comparative Politics 30: 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Sunhyuk. 1997. “State and Civil Society in South Korea's Democratic Consolidation: Is the Battle Really Over?”Asian Survey 37: 1135–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Yong-Ik. 2000. Interview by author, Health Solidarity, Seoul, July 26.

  • Koo, Hagen. 1999. “The Middle Classes in the East Asian Newly Industrialized Societies: Issues, Preliminary Findings and Further Questions.” Pp. 83–100 inEast Asian Middle Classes in Comparative Perspective, ed. Hsin-Huang Hsiao. Taipei: Institute of Ethnology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, Walter. 1983.The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ku, Yeun-Wen. 1997.Welfare Capitalism in Taiwan: State, Economy and Social Policy. London: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, Kuo-Wen. 1999. Interview by author, Taiwan Labor Front, Taipei, 19 October.

  • Kwon, Huck-Ju. 1999.The Welfare State in Korea: The Politics of Legitimation. London: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Jong-Chan. 1993.The Politics of National Health Insurance in South Korea, 1961–1989. Ph.D. Dissertation, School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University.

  • Lee, Yoong-Jung. 2000. Interview by author, Citizens' Coalition for Economic Justice, Seoul, 31 May.

  • Lin, Jih-Wen. 1998. “Vote Buying Versus Noise-Making: Two Models of Electoral Competition Under the Single Non-Transferable Vote Multi-Member District System.”Chinese Political Science Review 30: 93–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Kuo-Min. 1997.From Authoritarianism to Statism: The Politics of National Health Insurance in Taiwan. Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Sociology, Yale University.

  • Lin, Liang-Rong. 1999. Interview by author, Taiwan Labor Front, Taipei, 18 October.

  • Linz, Juan, and Alfred Stepan. 1996.Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mo, Jongryn. 1996. “Political Learning and Democratic Consolidation: Korean Industrial Relations, 1987–1992.”Comparative Political Studies, 29: 290–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, Chung-In and Song-Min Kim. 2000. “Democracy and Economic Performance.” Pp. 139–172 inConsolidating Democracy in South Korea, ed. Larry Diamond and Byung-Kook Kim. Boulder: Lynne-Reinner.

    Google Scholar 

  • NFMI (National Federation of Medical Insurance). 1999.1998 Medical Insurance, Statistical Yearbook. Seoul: NFMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • NHI Coalition. 1998.Big Business Health Insurance, Citizens without Insurance. March. [in Chinese].

  • Oh, Yang-Soon. 2000. Interview by author, Grand National Party (Legislator), Seoul, 20 July.

  • Peng, Ito and Joseph Wong. 2004. “Growing Out of the Developmental State: East Asian Welfare Reform in the 1990s.” Paper presented at theRC19 Conference on Poverty, Welfare and Social Policy. Paris, France, 2–4 September.

  • Przeworski, Adam. 1999. “Minimalist Conceptions of Democracy: A Defense.” Pp. 23–55 inDemocracy's Value, ed. Ian Shapiro and Casiano Hacker-Cordon. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, et al. 1996. “What Makes Democracies Endure?”Journal of Democracy. 7: 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigger, Shelley. 1999.Politics in Taiwan: Voting for Democracy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts Kenneth. 1998.Deepening Democracy? The Modern Left and Social Movements in Chile and Peru. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, Paul. 1993. “Policy Change Over a Decade or More.” Pp. 13–40 inPolicy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, ed. Paul Sabatier and Hank Jenkins-Smith. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988. “An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy Oriented Learning Therein.”Policy Sciences, 21: 129–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, Philippe and Javier Santiso. 1998. “Three Temporal Dimensions to the Consolidation of Democracy.”International Political Science Review 19: 69–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, Philippe. 1997. “Civil Society East and West” Pp. 239–262 inConsolidating the Third Wave Democracies: Themes and Perspectives, ed. Larry Diamond et al. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seong, Kyoung-Ryung. 2000. “Civil Society and Democratic Consolidation in South Korea: Great Achievements and Remaining Problems.” Pp. 87–110 inConsolidating Democracy in South Korea, ed. Larry Diamond and Byung-Kook Kim. Boulder: Lynne Reinner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Doh-Chull and Richard Rose. 1998. “Responding to Economic Crisis: the 1998 New Korea Barometer Survey.”Studies in Public Policy, Paper No. 311.

  • Smolar, Aleksander. 1997. “From Opposition to Atomization” Pp. 263–277 inConsolidating the Third Wave Democracies: Themes and Perspectives, ed. Larry Diamond et al. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilas, Carlos. 1997. “Participation, Inequality and the Whereabouts of Democracy.” Pp. 3–42 inThe New Politics of Inequality in Latin America: Rethinking Participation and Representation, ed. Douglas Chalmers et al. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wachman, Alan. 1994.Taiwan: National Identity and Democratization. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyland, Kurt. 1996.Democracy Without Equity: Failures of Reform in Brazil. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Joseph. 2004.Healthy Democracies: Welfare Politics in Taiwan and South Korea. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2003. “Deepening Democracy in Taiwan,”Pacific Affairs 76: 235–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, Woo-Hyun. 2000. Interview by author, Korean Confederation of Trade Unions, Policy Division, Seoul, 8 June.

Download references

Authors
  1. Joseph Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Joseph Wong is assistant professor of political science at the University of Toronto. He is the author ofHealthy Democracies: Welfare Politics in Taiwan and South Korea, published by Cornell University Press. Wong received his Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

The author thanks Edward Friedman, Jay Krishnan, Ito Peng, Richard Sandbrook, Linda White, along with the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. Thanks also to Uyen Quach and Nina Mansoori for their research assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wong, J. Adapting to democracy: Societal mobilization and social policy in Taiwan and South Korea. St Comp Int Dev 40, 88–111 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686300

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686300

Keywords

Search

Navigation