Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of deregulation on labor demand in class-I railroads

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980 on labor demand in Class-I railroads during 1961–1990. The demand for labor is a function of output, hourly wage rates, a time trend, and a vector of interactive dummy variables. Since deregulation, the labor demand curve has shifted downward; wage elasticities have become more elastic, ranging from −0.668 in 1980 to −1.187 in 1990; output elasticities trended upward from 0.557 to 0.809; and the marginal product of labor rose from 3.421 to 5.296 during 1980–1990. These findings suggest that unions’ bargaining power has declined, that the total wage bill is likely to decrease if the real wage rate rises further, and that cost savings and efficiency gains are realized through increases in the marginal product of labor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, J. “UTU Rank-and-File Endorses Crew Size Reductions on CSX.”Traffic World 26 (December 1988): 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkenov, Christopher C., and Andrew N. Kleit. “The Cost of Railroad Regulation: A Further Analysis.” Bureau of Economics Working Paper no. 164. Washington, D. C.: Federal Trade Commission, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, Kenneth D. “The Costs of Price Regulation: Lessons from Railroad Deregulation.”Rand Journal of Economics 18 (Autumn 1987): 408–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box, George E. P., and David R. Cox. “An Analysis of Transformation.”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (1964): 211–43.

  • Card, David. “The Impact of Deregulation on the Employment and Wages of Airline Mechanics.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 39 (July 1986): 527–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D. W., L. R. Christensen, and J. A. Swanson. “Economic Performance in Regulated and Unregulated Environments: A Comparison of U.S. and Canadian Railroads.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 96 (1981): 559–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, Harold. “Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy.”Journal of Law and Economics 16 (April 1973): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh, Daniel S. “Econometric Studies of Labor Demand and Their Application to Policy Analysis.”Journal of Human Resources 11 (Fall 1976): 507–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____. “The Demand for Labor in the Long-Run.” In Orley C. Ashenfelter and Richard Layard, eds.Handbook of Labor Economics. Vol. I, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1986, 429–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, Wallace E. “Regulations and Labor Earnings.”Bell Journal of Economics 8 (Autumn 1977): 483–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsing, Yu. “Testing for the Flexible Employment Elasticity Hypothesis: Application of an Expanded Box-Cox Model to U.S. Manufacturing.”Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 29 (Summer 1989): 96–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kmenta, Jan.Elements of Econometrics. 2nd edition. New York: Macmillan, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Tenpao, C. Phillip Baumel, and Patricia Harris. “Market Structure, Conduct, and Performance of the Class-I Railroad Industry, 1971–1984.”Transportation Journal 27 (Summer 1987): 54–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieb, R. C. “The Changing Nature of Labor/Management Relations in Transportation.”Transportation Journal 23 (Spring 1984): 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, James M. “Railroad Deregulation, Innovation, and Competition: Effects of the Staggers Act on Grain Transportation.”Journal of Law and Economics 32 (April 1989): 63–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, Henry. “The Effects of United States Railroad Deregulation on Shippers, Labor, and Capital.”Journal of Regulatory Economics 1 (September 1989): 259–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Thomas Gale. “U.S. Airline Deregulation: Its Effects on Passengers, Capital, and Labor.”Journal of Law and Economics 29 (April 1986): 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Nancy L. “Labor Rent Sharing and Regulation: Evidence from the Trucking Industry.”Journal of Political Economy 95 (December 1987): 1146–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Task Force on Railroad Productivity.Improving Railroad Productivity. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, Robert J. “The Elasticity of Demand for Public School Teachers.”Industrial Relations 18 (Winter 1979): 86–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willig, Robert D., and William J. Baumol. “Railroad Deregulation: Using Competition As a Guide.”Regulation 11 (January/February 1987): 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, William W., Wesley W. Wilson, and Won W. Koo. “Modal Competition and Pricing in Grain Transport.”Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 22 (September 1988): 319–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We thank an anonymous referee and Henry McFarland for insightful comments and assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hsing, Y., Mixon, F.G. The impact of deregulation on labor demand in class-I railroads. Journal of Labor Research 16, 1–8 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685709

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685709

Keywords

Navigation