Abstract
We examined whether ideological differences influenced perceptions of the underlying causes of public aid applicants’ predicaments, and whether in turn ideology-patterned attributions accounted for how resource allocators prioritized need- and efficiency-related goals in allocating aid. To examine the need-efficiency trade-off, participants (N=112) divided a hypothetical pool of aid applicants for subsidized health insurance into two “incorrect” allocation outcomes: false alarms (allocate aid to unneedy applicants) and misses (deny aid to needy applicants). Moreover, to examine beliefs about the absolute percentage of aid applicants who are truly in need of societal assistance, participants divided the remaining aid applicants into two “correct” allocation outcomes: hits (allocate aid to needy applicants) and correct rejections (deny aid to unneedy applicants). Results of a series of structural equation models indicated that conservatism was linked to the causal belief that aid applicants’ predicaments arise from dispositional rather than situational factors, which in turn predicted a preference for making efficiency-related over need-related resource allocation judgments (e.g., preferring misses to false alarms) and the belief that a relatively small number of aid applicants are truly in need of societal assistance (e.g., preferring correct rejections to hits). Results are discussed in terms of how ideologically driven attributions influence the manner in which people resolve need-efficiency trade-offs inherent in the context of public aid decision making.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altmeyer, B. (1981).Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
Bargh, J. A., Bond, R. N., Lombardi, W. J., and Tota, M. E. (1986). The additive nature of chronic and temporary sources of construct accessibility.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50: 869–878.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models.Psychol. Bull. 107: 238–246.
Carroll, J., Perkowitz, W., Lurigio, A., and Weaver, K. (1987). Sentencing goals, causal attributions, and personality.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 52: 107–118.
Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice.J. Soc. Issues 31: 137–150.
Deutsch, M. (1985).Distributive justice, Yale University Press, New Haven CT.
Drasgow, F., and Kanfer, R. (1985). Equivalence of psychological measurement in heterogeneous populations.J. Appl. Psychol. 70: 662–680.
Eagly, A. H., and Chaiken, S. (1993).The Psychology of Attitudes, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
Eagly, A. H., Chaiken, S., and Wood, W. (1981). An attributional analysis of persuasion. In Harvey, J. H., Ickes, W. J., and Kidd, R. F. (eds.),New Directions in Attribution Research, Vol. 3, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 37–62.
Feather, N. T. (1975).Values in Education and Society, Free Press, New York.
Feather, N. T. (1984). Protestant ethic, conservatism, and values.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46: 1132–1141.
Feather, N. T. (1985). Attitudes, values, and attributions: Explanations for unemployment.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 48: 876–889.
Feather, N. T. (1992). An attributional and value analysis of deservingness in success and failure situations.Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 31: 125–145.
Feather, N. T. (1994a). Attitudes toward high achievers and reactions to their fall: Theory and research concerning tall poppies. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 26, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 1–73.
Feather, N. T. (1994b). Human values and their relation to justice.J. Soc. Issues 50: 129–151.
Feather, N. T. (1996). Reactions to penalities for an offense in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71: 571–587.
Freedman, J. L., and Sears, D. O. (1965). Selective exposure. In Berkowitz, L. (ed),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 57–97.
Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 19, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 41–80.
Furnham, A. (1982a). Why are the poor always with us? Explanations for poverty in Britain.Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 21: 311–322.
Furnham, A. (1982b). Explanations for unemployment in Britain.Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 12: 335–352.
Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., and Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54: 733–740.
Jöreskog, K. G., and Sörnom, D. (1993).LISREL 8: A Guide to the Program and Applications, SPSS, Chicago, IL.
Katz, I., and Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive processes.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 55: 893–905.
Kerlinger, F. N. (1984).Liberalism and Conservatism: The Nature and Structure of Social Attitudes, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Lavine, H., Sullivan, J. L., Borgida, E., and Thomsen, C. J. (1996). The relationship of national and personal issues salience to attitude accessibility on foreign and domestic policy issues.Polit. Psychol. 17: 293–316.
Lavine, H., Thomsen, C. J., and Gonzales, M. H. (1977). The development of interattitudinal consistency: The shared consequences model.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.
Leventhal, G. S. (1976). The distributions of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In Berkowitz, L. and Walster, E. (eds.),Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 9, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 92–131.
Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., and Fry, W. R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In Mikula, G. (ed.),Justice and Social Interaction: Experimental and Theoretical Contributions from Psychological Research, Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 167–218.
Major B., and Deaux, K. (1982). Individual differences in justice behavior. In Greenberg, J. and Cohen, R. L. (eds.),Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, Academic Press, New York.
Miller, W. (1973). Ideology and criminal justice policy: Some current issues.J. Crim. Law Criminol. 64: 141–162.
Murphy-Berman, V., Berman, J. J., Singh, P., Pachauri, A., and Kumar, P. (1984). Factors affecting allocation to needy and meritorious recipients: A cross-cultural comparison.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46: 1267–1272.
Okun, A. M. (1975).Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff, The Brookings Institute, Washington, DC.
Rasinski, K. A. (1987). What’s fair is fair: Or is it?J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 53: 201–211.
Reisenzein, R. (1986). A structural equation model of Weiner’s attribution-affect model of helping behavior.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50: 1123–1133.
Rudman, L. A., and Borgida, E. (1995). The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects.J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 31: 493–517.
Schwinger, T. (1980). Just allocations of goods: Decisions among three principles. In Mikula G. (ed.),Justice and Social Interaction: Experimental and Theoretical Contributions from Psychological Research, Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 95–126.
Sniderman, P. M., Hagen, M. G., Tetlock, P. E., and Brady, H. E. (1986). Reasoning chains: Causal models of policy reasoning in mass publics.Br. J. Polit. Sci. 16: 405–430.
Skitka, L. J., and Tetlock, P. E. (1992). Allocating scarce resources: A contingency model of distributive justice.J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 28: 33–37.
Skitka, L. J., and Tetlock, P. E. (1993). Providing public assistance: Cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65: 113–127.
Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach.Multivar. Behav. Res. 25: 173–180.
Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Cognitive style and political ideology.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 45: 118–126.
Tetlock, P. E. (1984). Cognitive style and political belief systems in the British House of Commons.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46: 365–375.
Trope, Y. (1986). Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution.Psychol. Rev. 93: 239–257.
Utne, M. K., and Kidd, R. F. (1880). Equity and attribution. In Mikula, G. (ed),Justice and Social Interaction: Experimental and Theoretical Contributions from Psychological Research, Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 63–93.
Weiner, B. (1980). A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgments of help-giving.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39: 186–200.
Weiner, B. (1986).An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Williams, S. (1984). Left-right ideological differences in blaming victims.Polit. Psychol. 5: 573–581.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Christiansen, N.D., Lavine, H. Need-efficiency trade-offs in the allocation of resources: Ideological and attributional differences in public aid decision making. Soc Just Res 10, 289–310 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02683305
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02683305