Skip to main content
Log in

Prescribers, patients and policy: The limits of technique

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What is good prescribing? In this paper we will look at the kinds of criteria which are relevant to evaluating prescribing. In particular we wish to challenge, or at least re-frame, the picture of prescribing as an essentially technical process. In so doing we hope to indicate something more general about the power, and limitations, of technical rationality in health care, and to contribute something to work in health care technology assessment. Finally we hope this discussion will act as a stimulus towards a much needed revision of the way ‘good’ prescribing is defined by current policies, guidelines and protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barber, N.D. (1995). What constitutes good prescribing?British Medical Journal 310, 923–925.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Davis, P. (ed) (1992).For Health Or Profit? Medicine, The Pharmaceutical Industry, And The State In New Zealand, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cribb, A., Barber, N. Prescribers, patients and policy: The limits of technique. Health Care Anal 5, 292–298 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678527

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678527

Keywords

Navigation