Skip to main content
Log in

Flow regimes in submerged gas injection

  • Published:
Metallurgical Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 December 1980

Abstract

The behavior of gas discharging into a liquid has been investigated in the labora-tory and in plant. The laboratory work has involved the injection of different gases from a submerged, horizontal tuyere into water, zinc-chloride solution, and a mercury bath. High speed cinematography and pressure measurements in the tuyere have been carried out to characterize the flow regimes. In the case of the mercury bath, a novel “half-tuyere” has been developed to permit visual observation of the gas. In this way, two regimes of flow, bubbling and steady jetting, have been delineated as a function of the modified Froude number and the ratio of gas to liquid densities. Pressure measurements at the tuyere tip have been correlated to the different stages of bubble growth in the bubbling regime, and can be used to distinguish one flow regime from the other. The measured bubble frequency and volume correspond reasonably well to predictions of a simple model of bubble growth under conditions of constant flow. The forward penetration of the jet centerline from the tuyere tip has been measured and found to depend both onN Fr′ andρg/ρl. In the industrial tests, pressure taps have been installed in the tuyeres of a nickel converter to monitor the pressure wave of the jets under normal, low pressure blowing operations. The measurements show that the converter jets operate in the bubbling mode with a bubble frequency of 10 to 12 s−1, similar to a gas jet in mercury. Tests involving higher pressure injection indicate that the steady jetting, or underexpanded, regime obtains at pressures of about 340 kPa (50 psi). Based on equivalent experiments in the laboratory, it is clear that low pressure blowing has the disadvantage of poor penetration of air into the bath so that the jets rise close to the back wall and locally accelerate refractory wear. Moreover between the formation of successive bubbles, the bath washes against the tuyere mouth and contributes to accretion formation. This necessitates periodic punching of the tuyeres which also contributes to refractory wear at the tuyere line. The use of high pressure injection to achieve steady jetting conditions, as currently practiced in the new bottom blown steelmaking processes, should be considered to solve these prob-lems, and possibly usher in a new generation of nonferrous converters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G.N. Oryall and J.K. Brimacombe:Met. Trans. B, 1976, vol. 7B, pp. 391–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. A. V. Spesivtsev, V. V. Mechev, G. B. Strekalovskii, and A. V. Vanyukov:Tsvet. Metall., 1973, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Kumar and N. R. Kuloor:Adv. Chem. Eng., 1979, vol. 8, pp. 255–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Clift, J. R. Grace, and M. E. Weber:Bubbles, Drops, and Particles, pp. 321–28, Academic Press, NY, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. F. Davidson and B. O. G. Schuler:Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 1960, vol. 38, pp. 335–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. K. Walters and J. F. Davidson:J. FluidMech., 1962, vol. 12, pp. 408–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. F. Davidson and D. Harrison:FluidizedParticles, 1963, Cambridge Univ. Press, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G.A. Irons and R. I. L. Guthrie:Met. Trans. B, 1978, vol. 9B, pp. 101–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. R. J. Andreini, J. S. Foster, and R. W. Callen:Met. Trans. B, 1977, vol. 8B, pp. 625–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. J. W. McKelliget, M. Cross, R. D. Gibson, and J. K. Brimacombe: Unpublished work, Sunderland Polytechnic, Sunderland, U.K., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Savard and R. Lee: U.S. Patent No. 2,855,293, October 7, 1958.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02670149.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoefele, E.O., Brimacombe, J.K. Flow regimes in submerged gas injection. Metall Trans B 10, 631–648 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02662566

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02662566

Keywords

Navigation