Skip to main content
Log in

Species identity of insect cell lines

  • Published:
In Vitro Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Three mosquito cell cultures designated as Suitor's clone ofAedes aegypti, Culiseta inornata, andAedes vexans were shown to be moth by immunological, karyological, and isozyme analyses. The cells reacted with rabbit antimoth serum but not rabbit antimosquito serum. Chromosome analyses indicated Lepidopteran rather than Dipteran morphology, and three isozyme systems were confirmative. Any one of these assays would be sufficient to indicate that contamination had occurred and could be used as a periodic check for identity of cell cultures. Morphology and growth characteristics are also valid criteria to distinguish between these particular orders of insect cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grace, T. D. C. 1962. Establishment of four strains of cells from insect tissues grown in vitro. Nature (Lond.) 195: 788–789.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh, K. R. P. 1967. Cell cultures derived from larvac ofAedes albopictus (Skuse) andAedes aegypti (L.) Curr. Sci. 36: 506–508.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Peleg, J. 1968. Growth of arboviruses in monolayers from subcultured mosquito embryo cells. Virology 35: 617–619.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brand, K. G., and J. Syverton. 1962. Results of species specific hemagglutination test on “transformed,” nontransformed and primary cell cultures. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 28: 147–157.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Herrick, P. R., G. W. Baumann, D. J. Merchant, M. C. Schearer, C. Shipman, Jr., and R. G. Brackett. 1970. Serologic and karyologic evidence of incorrect identity of an animal cell line (guinea pig spleen). In Vitro 6: 143–147.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cell Culture Colletion Committee. 1964. A culture collection of animal cell strains. Science 146: 241–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McGarrity, G. M., and L. L. Coriell. 1971. Procedures to reduce contamination of cell cultures. In Vitro 6: 257–265.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Suitor, E. C., L. L. Chang, and H. H. Lin. 1966. Establishment and characterization of a clone from Grace's in vitro cultured mosquito (Aedes aegypti L.) cells. Exp. Cell Res. 44: 572–578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yunker, C. E., J. L. Vaughn, and J. Cory. 1967. Adaptation of an insect cell line (Grace's Antheraea cells) to medium free of insect hemolymph. Science 155: 1565–1566.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sweet, B. H., and J. S. McHale 1970. Characterization of cell lines derived fromCuliseta inornata andAedes vexans mosquitoes. Exp. Cell Res. 61: 51–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Greene, A. E., and J. Charney. 1970. Characterization and identification of insect cell cultures. In: E. Weiss (Ed.),Arthropod Cell Cultures and Their Application to the Study of Viruses. Vol. 55,Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology. springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Charney, J., and L. L. Coriell. 1964. Demonstration, purification and partial characterization of abnormal (HSL) antigens in stable human cell line. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 33: 285–301.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Crowle, A. J. 1958. A simplified micro double-diffusion agar precipitin technique. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 52: 784–787.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson, J. M., C. G. Kanapi, R. H. Richardson, M. R. Wheeler, and N. S. Stone. 1966. An operational classification of Drosophila esterases for species comparisons. The University of Texas Publications, p. 517.

  15. Shaw, C. R., and A. L. Koen. 1968. Starch gel zone electrophoresis of enzymes. In: I. Smith (Ed.),Zone Electrophoresis. 2nd ed., Vol. 2. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nichols, W. W., C. Bradt, and W. Bowne. 1970. Cytogenetic studies on cell in culture from the class Insecta. In: E. Weiss (Ed.),Arthropod Cell Cultures and Their Application to the Study of Viruses. Vol. 55,Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thomson, J. A., and T. D. C. Grace. 1963. Cytological observations on cell strains cstablished in culture from insect ovarian tissue. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 16: 869–876.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Greene, A. E., L. L. Coriell, and J. Charney. 1969. Species identification of poikilothermie tissue culture cells. In: M. Mizell (Ed.)Biology of Amphibian Tumors. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 279–295.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Coriell, L. L. 1968. Laminar flow systems for sterile work. In: Cell cultures for virus vaccine production. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 29: 569–574.

  20. Grace, T. D. C. 1966. Establishment of a line of mosquito (Aedes aegypti L.) cells grown in vitro. Nature (Lond.) 211: 366–367.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ibraham, A. N., and B. H. Sweet. 1970. Antigenic relationships of mosquito cell lines as determined by immuno-diffusion techniques. In: E. Weiss (ed.)Arthropod Cell Cultures, and Their Application to the Study of Viruses. Curr. Topics Microbiol. Immunol. 55: 47–51.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

These studies were supported by Grant CA-04953-12 from the National Cancer Institute; General Research Support Grant FR-5582 from the National Institutes of Health; and Grant-in-Aid Contract M-43 from the State of New Jersey.

Recipient of Research Career Award 5-K3-16,749 from the National Institutes of Health.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greene, A.E., Charney, J., Nichols, W.W. et al. Species identity of insect cell lines. In Vitro 7, 313–322 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02661721

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02661721

Keywords

Navigation