Skip to main content
Log in

Stress-corrosion cracking of 15cr-15ni-2.2mo titanium-modified austenitic stainless steels

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stress- corrosion cracking (SCC) behavior of two alloys of titanium- modified austenitic stainless steels with different TiJC ratios in the 20% cold worked condition was studied in 45% boiling magnesium chloride (BP427 K) using the constant- extension rate testing (CERT) technique. The SCC susceptibility of the two titanium-modified alloys was assessed using the ratios of the values of ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and percent elongation in magnesium chloride and liquid paraffin, the susceptibility index (I), crack propagation rates (CPR), and stress ratios at different values of plastic strains. The results obtained on these alloys were compared with AISI type 316 stainless steel. It was observed that the two titaniummodified austenitic stainless steels had better SCC resistance than type 316 stainless steel, mainly due to their higher nickel content and, to a lesser extent, to the presence of titanium. Increasing the value of the TiJC ratio led to increased SCC resistance due to the availability of more free titanium in the solid solution. Fractography of the failed samples indicated failure by a combination of transgranular SCC and ductile fracture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Rodriguez and S.L. Mannan,Ind. J. Technol., Vol 28, 1990, p 281.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. W.G. Jhonstone, T. Lauritzer, J.H. Rosolowski, and A.M. Turkalo,Proc. Sem. Radiation Damage in Metals, American Society for Metals, 1973, p 227.

  3. O. Steigler and E.E. Bloon.J.Nucl. Mater., Vol 41, 1971, p341- 344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C.V. Sundaram, P. Rodgriguez, and S.L. Mannan,J. Inst. Eng. (Ind.), Vol 67, 1986, p 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Venkadesan, P.V. Sivaprasad, M. Vasudevan, S. Venugopal, and P. Rodriguez,Trans. Ind. Inst. Met., Vol 45, 1992, p 57–68.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. R.M. Latanision and R.W. Staehle,Proc. Conf. Fundamental Aspects of Stress Corrosion Cracking, NACE, 1969, p 214-307.

  7. H.E. Hanninen,Int. Met. Rev., Vol 24, 1979, p 85–135.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. H.S. Khatak, P. Muraleedharan, J.B. Gnanamoorthy, and P. Rodriguez,J. Nucl. Mater., Vol 168, 1989, p 157–161.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Hishida and H. Nakada,Corrosion, Vol 33, 1977, p 332–338.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. CD. Kim and B.E. Wilde,Stress Corrosion Cracking—The Slow Strain Rate Technique, ASTM STP 665, 1979, p 97-112.

  11. P.S. Maiya, W.J. Shack, and T.F. Kassner,Corrosion, Vol 46, 1990, p 954–963.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Desestret and R. Oltra,Con. Sci., Vol 20, 1980, p 799–820.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. H.S. Khatak, P. Muraleedharan, J.B. Gnanamoorthy, P. Rodriguez, and K.A. Padmanabhan, Poster Session Papers,6th Int. Conf. Fracture (New Delhi), 1984, p 153-157.

  14. H. Shaikh, H.S. Khatak, S.K. Seshadri, J.B. Gnanamoorthy, and P. Rodriguez,Metall. Trans. A, in press.

  15. S. Venkadesan, A.K. Bhaduri, P. Rodriguez, and K.A. Padmanabhan,J. Nucl. Mater., Vol 186, 1992, p 177–184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shaikh, H., Venkadesan, S., Narayanan, C. et al. Stress-corrosion cracking of 15cr-15ni-2.2mo titanium-modified austenitic stainless steels. JMEP 1, 823–829 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02658266

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02658266

Keywords

Navigation