Abstract
The bioleaching of different mineral sulfide concentrates with thermophilic bacteria (genusSulfolobus @#@) was studied. Since the use of this type of bacteria in leaching systems involves stirring and the control of temperature, the influence of the type of stirring and the pulp density on dissolution rates was studied in order to ascertain the optimum conditions for metal recovery. At low pulp densities, the dissolution kinetic was favored by pneumatic stirring, but for higher pulp densities, orbital stirring produced the best results. A comparative study of three differential concentrates, one mixed concentrate, and one global concentrate was made. Copper and iron extraction is directly influenced by bacterial activity, while zinc dissolution is basically due to an indirect mechanism that is activated in the presence of copper ions. Galvanic interactions between the different sulfides favors the selective bioleaching of some phases (sphalerite and chalcopyrite) and leads to high metal recovery rates. However, the formation of galvanic couples depends on the type of concentrate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G. Barbery, A.W. Fletcher, and L.L. Sirois:Complex Sulphide Ores Conference, The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, Rome, 1980, pp. 135–50.
G. Rossi:Biohydrometallurgy, McGraw-Hill Publ. Co., New York, NY, 1990, pp. 44–45.
A. Ballester, M.L. Blázquez, F. González, and M.A. Barril:Metall. Trans. B, 1989, vol. 20B, pp. 773–79.
E. Gómez, F. González, M.L. Blázquez, and A. Ballester: EMC’91ba Non-Ferrous Metallurgy—Present and Future, Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd., Barking, United Kingdom, 1991, pp. 97–107.
S.N. Groudev, F.N. Genchev, and S.S. Gaidarjiev: inMetallurgical Applications of Bacterial Leaching and Related Microbiological Phenomena, L.E. Murr, A.E. Torma, andJ.A. Brierley, eds., Academic Press, New York, NY, 1978, pp. 253–74.
C.L. Brierley and J.A. Brierley:Can. J. Microbiol., 1972, vol. 19, pp. 183–88.
A. Ballester, F. Gonzalez, M.L. Blázquez, and P.R. Noms:Congreso Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología Metalúrgicas, CENIM, Madrid, 1990.
E.B. Lindstr⋏om, E. Gunnerinsson, and O.H. Tuovinen:Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., 1992, vol. 12, pp. 133–35.
P. Bos and J.G. Kuenen: inMicrobial Mineral Recovery,H.L. Ehrlich and C.L. Brierley, eds., McGraw-Hill Publ. Co., New York, NY, 1990, pp. 343–77.
E.B. Lindstrom and H.M. Sehlin:Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1989, vol. 55, pp. 3020–21.
P.R. Norrisba:8th Int. Biotechnology Symposium, Paris, 1988.
F. Habashi:Chalcopyriteba Its Chemistry and Metallurgy, McGraw-Hill Co., New York, NY, 1978, pp. 99–105.
A.P. Mehta and L.E. Murr:Biotechnol. Bioeng., 1982, vol. 24, pp. 919–40.
K.A. Natarajan:Min. Metall. Process., 1988, vol. 5, pp. 61–65.
J.M. Frenay:Proc. Conf. Int. Congr. on Applied Mineralogy in the Mineral Industry, Los Angeles, CA, 1984, Trans. TMS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1985, pp. 22–25.
J. Ralston and T.W. Healy:Int. J. Min. Process., 1980, vol. 7, pp. 175–217.
J. Bessière, K. Chlihi, J.M. Thiebaut, and G. Roussy:Int. J. Min. Process., 1990, vol. 28, pp. 1–13.
A. Ballester, M.L. Blázquez, F. González, and J.A. Mu∼noz:Biorecovery, 1989, vol. 1, pp. 127–44.
F. Acevedo, M.A. Cacciuttolo, and J.C. Gentina:Proc. Int. Symp., Biohydrometallurgy, Warwick, 1987, P.R. Norris and D.P. Kelly, eds., Science and Technology Letters, Kew Surrey, United Kingdom, 1988, pp. 385–94.
H. Majima:Can. Metall. Q., 1969, vol. 8, pp. 269–73.
V. Berry, L. Murr, and J. Hiskey:Hydrometallurgy, 1978, vol. 3, pp. 309–26.
A.E. Torma: inHydrometallurgy and Electrometallurgy of Copper, W.C. Cooper, D.J. Kemp, G.E. Lagos, and K.G. Tan, eds., Pergamon Press, New York, NY, 1991, pp. 73–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Torres, F., Blázquez, M.L., González, F. et al. The bioleaching of different sulfide concentrates using thermophilic bacteria. Metall Mater Trans B 26, 455–465 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02653862
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02653862