Skip to main content
Log in

The bioleaching of different sulfide concentrates using thermophilic bacteria

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The bioleaching of different mineral sulfide concentrates with thermophilic bacteria (genusSulfolobus @#@) was studied. Since the use of this type of bacteria in leaching systems involves stirring and the control of temperature, the influence of the type of stirring and the pulp density on dissolution rates was studied in order to ascertain the optimum conditions for metal recovery. At low pulp densities, the dissolution kinetic was favored by pneumatic stirring, but for higher pulp densities, orbital stirring produced the best results. A comparative study of three differential concentrates, one mixed concentrate, and one global concentrate was made. Copper and iron extraction is directly influenced by bacterial activity, while zinc dissolution is basically due to an indirect mechanism that is activated in the presence of copper ions. Galvanic interactions between the different sulfides favors the selective bioleaching of some phases (sphalerite and chalcopyrite) and leads to high metal recovery rates. However, the formation of galvanic couples depends on the type of concentrate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Barbery, A.W. Fletcher, and L.L. Sirois:Complex Sulphide Ores Conference, The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, Rome, 1980, pp. 135–50.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Rossi:Biohydrometallurgy, McGraw-Hill Publ. Co., New York, NY, 1990, pp. 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Ballester, M.L. Blázquez, F. González, and M.A. Barril:Metall. Trans. B, 1989, vol. 20B, pp. 773–79.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Gómez, F. González, M.L. Blázquez, and A. Ballester: EMC’91ba Non-Ferrous Metallurgy—Present and Future, Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd., Barking, United Kingdom, 1991, pp. 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S.N. Groudev, F.N. Genchev, and S.S. Gaidarjiev: inMetallurgical Applications of Bacterial Leaching and Related Microbiological Phenomena, L.E. Murr, A.E. Torma, andJ.A. Brierley, eds., Academic Press, New York, NY, 1978, pp. 253–74.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C.L. Brierley and J.A. Brierley:Can. J. Microbiol., 1972, vol. 19, pp. 183–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Ballester, F. Gonzalez, M.L. Blázquez, and P.R. Noms:Congreso Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología Metalúrgicas, CENIM, Madrid, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E.B. Lindstr⋏om, E. Gunnerinsson, and O.H. Tuovinen:Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., 1992, vol. 12, pp. 133–35.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Bos and J.G. Kuenen: inMicrobial Mineral Recovery,H.L. Ehrlich and C.L. Brierley, eds., McGraw-Hill Publ. Co., New York, NY, 1990, pp. 343–77.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E.B. Lindstrom and H.M. Sehlin:Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1989, vol. 55, pp. 3020–21.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P.R. Norrisba:8th Int. Biotechnology Symposium, Paris, 1988.

  12. F. Habashi:Chalcopyriteba Its Chemistry and Metallurgy, McGraw-Hill Co., New York, NY, 1978, pp. 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A.P. Mehta and L.E. Murr:Biotechnol. Bioeng., 1982, vol. 24, pp. 919–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. K.A. Natarajan:Min. Metall. Process., 1988, vol. 5, pp. 61–65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. J.M. Frenay:Proc. Conf. Int. Congr. on Applied Mineralogy in the Mineral Industry, Los Angeles, CA, 1984, Trans. TMS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1985, pp. 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Ralston and T.W. Healy:Int. J. Min. Process., 1980, vol. 7, pp. 175–217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Bessière, K. Chlihi, J.M. Thiebaut, and G. Roussy:Int. J. Min. Process., 1990, vol. 28, pp. 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Ballester, M.L. Blázquez, F. González, and J.A. Mu∼noz:Biorecovery, 1989, vol. 1, pp. 127–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. F. Acevedo, M.A. Cacciuttolo, and J.C. Gentina:Proc. Int. Symp., Biohydrometallurgy, Warwick, 1987, P.R. Norris and D.P. Kelly, eds., Science and Technology Letters, Kew Surrey, United Kingdom, 1988, pp. 385–94.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Majima:Can. Metall. Q., 1969, vol. 8, pp. 269–73.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. V. Berry, L. Murr, and J. Hiskey:Hydrometallurgy, 1978, vol. 3, pp. 309–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. A.E. Torma: inHydrometallurgy and Electrometallurgy of Copper, W.C. Cooper, D.J. Kemp, G.E. Lagos, and K.G. Tan, eds., Pergamon Press, New York, NY, 1991, pp. 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Torres, F., Blázquez, M.L., González, F. et al. The bioleaching of different sulfide concentrates using thermophilic bacteria. Metall Mater Trans B 26, 455–465 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02653862

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02653862

Keywords

Navigation