Abstract
The assumption, that stress components in the direction of the surface normal are negligible in traditional residual stress determination methods by X-rays, has been recently disproved. In this paper we investigate the effect of normal stresses on the accuracy of these traditional methods. It is shown that appreciable error can exist in surface stresses determined by such methods, if normal stresses are present. New procedures are proposed to minimize these errors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
B. D. Cullity:Elements of X-ray Diffraction, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1978, pp. 447–79.
C. S. Barrett and T. B. Massalski:Structure of Metals, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1966, pp. 465–85.
T. Shiraiwa and Y. Sakamoto:Sumito Search, 1972, vol. 7, pp. 159–69.
H. Dölle and J. B. Cohen:Metall. Trans. A, 1980, vol. 11A, pp. 159–69.
J. B. Cohen, H. Dölle, and M. R. James:National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 567, 1980, pp. 453–7.
H. Dölle:J. Appl. Cryst., 1979, vol. 12, pp. 489–501.
C. J. Kelley and A. M. Short:SAE Technical Report J784a, 1971, pp. 61–62.
N. R. Draper and H. Smith:Applied Regression Analysis, 1st ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, 1966, pp. 1–43.
S. P. Timoshenko and J. N. Goodier:Theory of Elasticity, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1970, p. 71.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Noyan, I.C. Effect of gradients in multi-axial stress states on residual stress measurements with x-rays. Metall Trans A 14, 249–258 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02651622
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02651622