Abstract
Tempered martensite-retained austenite microstructures were produced by direct quenching a series of 41XX medium carbon steels, direct quenching and reheating a series of five 0.8C-Cr- Ni-Mo steels and intercritically austenitizing at various temperatures, and quenching a SAE 52100 steel. All specimens were tempered either at 150 °C or at 200 °C. Specimens were subjected to compression and tension testing in the microstrain regime to determine the elastic limits and microplastic response of the microstructures. The retained austenite and matrix carbon content of the intercritically austenized specimens were measured by X-ray diffraction and Mossbauer spectroscopy. The elastic limit of the microstructures decreases with increasing amounts of retained austenite. Refining of the austenite distribution increases the elastic limit. Low elastic limits are mainly due to low flow stresses in the austenite and not internal stresses. The elastic limit correlates with the largest austenite free-mean path by a Hall-Petch type equation. The elastic limit increases with decreasing intercritical austenitizing temperature in the SAE 52100 due to (1) a lower carbon content in the matrix reducing the retained austenite levels and (2) retained carbides that refine grain size and, therefore, the austenite distribution in quenched specimens. The microplastic response of stable austenite-martensite composites may be modeled by a rule of mixtures. In the microplastic region, the strain is accommodated by successively smaller austenite regions until the flow strength matches that of the martensite. Reheating and quenching refines the microstructure and renders the austenite unstable in the microplastic regime, causing transformation of the austenite to martensite by a strain-induced mechanism. The transformation of austenite to martensite occurs by a stress-assisted mechanism in medium carbon steels. The low elastic limits in medium carbon steels were due to the inability of the strain from the stress-assisted transformation of austenite to martensite to balance the plastic strain accumulated in the austenite.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Friedel: inElectron Microscopy and Strength of Crystals, G. Thomas and J. Washbum, eds., Interscience Publishers Inc, New York, NY, 1963, pp. 605–47.
C.J. McMahon, Jr.:Advances in Material Research, vol. 2, Microplasticity, Interscience Publishers Inc., New York, NY, 1968, pp. 121–39.
W.C. Leslie:The Physical Metallurgy of Steels, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1981, pp. 4–5.
H. Muir, B.L., Averbach, and M. Cohen:Trans. Am. Soc. Met., 1955, vol. 47, pp. 380–407.
H. Muir:J. Inst. Eng., 1956, June, pp. 161-68.
C.L. Magee and H.W. Paxton:Trans. AIME, 1968, vol. 242, pp. 1766–67.
C.L. Magee and H.W. Paxton:Trans. AIME, 1968, vol. 242, pp. 1741–65.
AS. McEvily, R.C. Ku, and T.L. Johnston:Trans. AIME, 1966, vol. 236, pp. 108–14.
F. Lecroisey and A. Pineau:Metall. Trans., 1972, vol. 3, pp. 387- 96.
G.B. Olson and M. Azrin:Metall. Trans. A, 1978, vol. 9A, pp. 713–21.
M.A. Zaccone and G. Krauss:Metall. Trans. A, 1989, vol. 20A, pp. 188–90.
G.N. Haidemenopoulos, M. Grujicic, G.B. Olson, and M. Cohen:acta Metall., 1989, vol. 37 (6), pp. 1677–82.
R.H. Richman and R.W. Landgraf:Metall. Trans. A, 1975, vol. 6A, pp. 955–64.
H. Brandis and W. Schmidt: inCase Hardened Steels: Microstructure and Residual Stress, E.E. Dresburg, ed., AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1984, pp. 182–209.
N. Brown: in tAdvances in Materials Research, vol. 2,Microplasticity, C.J. McMahon, Jr., ed., Interscience Publishers Inc., New York, NY, 1968, pp. 45–73.
C.F. Jatczak, J.A. Larson, and S.W. Shin:Retained Austenite and Its Measurement by X-ray Dittraction, SP-453, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 1980.
R.L. Miller:Trans. ASM, 1968, vol. 61, pp. 592–97.
H.P. Klug and L.E. Alexander:X-ray Diffraction Procedures, 2nd ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, 1974, pp. 272–412.
C.S. Roberts:Trans. AIME, 1953, vol. 191, pp. 203–12.
CA. Stickeis:Metall. Trans. A, 1974, vol. 5A, pp. 865–74.
G. Baozhu, M. Losz, and G. Krauss:Proc. Int. Conf. on Martensite Transformations, Japan Institute of Metals, Sendai, Japan, 1986, pp. 367–74.
W.C. Leslie:The Physical Metallurgy of Steels, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1981, p. 223.
L.J. Ebert:Metall. Trans. A, 1978, vol. 9A, pp. 1537–51.
R.L. Brown, H.J. Rack, and M. Cohen:Mater. Sci. Eng., 1975, vol. 21, pp. 25–34.
R.G. Davies:Metall. Trans. A, 1978, vol. 9A, pp. 451–55.
J.P. Hirth:Metall. Trans., 1972, vol. 3, pp. 3047–67.
J.D. Embury: inStrengthening Methods in Crystals, A. Kelly and R. Nicholson, eds., Wiley, New York, NY, 1972, pp. 331–401.
C.B. Eckstein and J.R.C. Guimaraes:J. Mater. Sci., 1984, vol. 19, pp. 3043–48.
K.R. Hayes: M.S. Thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Golden CO, 1985, T-2971.
G.B. Olson:Deformation, Processing and Structure, G. Krauss, ed., ASM Material Science Seminar, ASM INTERNATIONAL, Metals Park, OH, pp. 391-422.
J.V. De Sanden:Pract. Metallogr., 1980, vol. 17, pp. 238–43.
M. Zaccone, B. Kelly, and G. Krauss: inCarburizing: Processing and Performance, G. Krauss, ed., ASM INTERNATIONAL, Metals Park, OH, 1989, July, pp. 249–65.
A.P. Voskamp, R. Osterlund, P.C. Becker, and Ol. Vingsbo:Met. Technot., 1980, Jan., pp. 14-21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zaccone, M.A., Krauss, G. Elastic Limit and Microplastic Response of Hardened Steels. Metall Trans A 24, 2263–2277 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648600
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648600