Skip to main content
Log in

A simplified process for the elimination of the halphen-test response in cottonseed oils

  • Technical
  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society

Abstract

Since certain biological effects have been ascribed to the cyclopropenoids that give a positive response to the Halphen test, processes were explored to eliminate this response from cottonseed oils. Heating alkali-refined, Halphen-positive cottonseed oils in a modified laboratory deodorizer in the presence of cottonseed oil fatty acids, capric acid, citric acid, or phosphoric acid was found to be an effective method of eliminating this response.

These treated, Halphen-negative cottonseed oils, the untreated Halphen-positive cottonseed oil, and a corn oil control were incorporated into rations fed to different groups of laying hens. Hens that ingested either the Halphen-negative cottonseed oil or the corn control produced normal eggs, whereas hens fed the Halphen-positive cottonseed oil produced eggs with pink whites, decreased pH of whites, and increased pH of yolks on storage, and lower ratios of oleic acid to stearic acid in the yolk lipids.

The simple processes presented—particularly the use of cottonseed oil fatty acids—appear to offer a practical means of inactivating the cyclo-propenoids in cottonseed oil and thus eliminating the biological effects attributed to them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carter, F. L., and V. L. Frampton, Chem. Rev.64, 497–521 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Phe’ps, R. A., F. S. Shenstone, A. R. Kemmerer and R. J. Evans, Poultry Sci.44, 358–394 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Earle, F. R., E. H. Melvin, L. H. Mason, C. H. Van Etten, I. A. Wolff and Q. Jones, JAOCS36, 304–307 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shenstone, F. S., and J. R. Vickery, Nature190, 168–169 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kemmerer, A. R., B. W. Heywang, M. G. Vavich and R. A. Phelps, Poultry Sci.42, 893–895 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harris, J. A., F. C. Magne and E. L. Skau, JAOCS41, 309–311 (1964).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Evans, R. J., J. A. Davidson and S. L. Bandemer, J. Nutr.73, 282–290 (1961).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Evans, R. J., S. L. Bandemer, M. Anderson and J. A. Davidson, J. Nutr.76, 314–319 (1962).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Evans, R. J., J. A. Davidson, J. N. LaRue and S. L. Bandemer, Poultry Sci.42, 875–881 (1963).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Frampton, V. L., J. C. Kuck, A. B. Pepperman, Jr., W. A. Pons, A. B. Watts and C. Johnson, submitted for publication.

  11. Deutschman, A. J., Jr., J. W. Berry, H. W. Kircher and C. M. Sakir, JAOCS41, 175–176 (1964).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bailey, A. E., and R. O. Feuge, Ind. Eng. Chem.15, 280–281 (1943).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. AOCS “Official and Tentative Methods of Analysis,” 2nd rev. to 1963, Chicago.

  14. Rayner, E. T., D. C. Heinzelman and H. P. Dupuy (U. S. Department of Agriculture), U. S. 3,135,775 (1964).

  15. Schaible, P. J., S. L. Bandemer and J. A. Davidson, Poultry Sci.25, 440–445 (1946).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Steinke, F., personal communications.

  17. Luddy, F. E., R. A. Barford and R. W. Riemenschneider, JAOCS37, 447–451 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

So. Utiliz. Res. Dev. Div., ARS, USDA.

About this article

Cite this article

Rayner, E.T., Brown, L.E. & Dupuy, H.P. A simplified process for the elimination of the halphen-test response in cottonseed oils. J Am Oil Chem Soc 43, 113–115 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02641030

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02641030

Keywords

Navigation