Skip to main content
Log in

Culture phenotype affects on regeneration capacity in the monocotHaworthia comptoniana

  • Developmental Biology/Morphogenesis
  • Published:
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Haworthia comptoniana specimens were cultured to determine how benzyladenine (BA) level and in vitro selection for shoot and callus production affected regeneration capacity and plant phenotype. Leaf explants were cultured on Murashige and Skoog medium containing 0 to 10 mg·liter−1 of BA. The highest number of shoots was obtained with 0.5 mg·liter−1 of BA.H. comptoniana stock cultures (hc) maintained with 0.5 mg·liter−1 of BA produced clumps of small shoots interspersed with friable, white, tan, and green callus. A clump of very large shoots was isolated and designated cell line Rhc; it differed from the original hc culture in shoot size, the lack of callus growth, and higher water content. A line of green callus (designated Gc), a line of white callus (Wc), and a line of soft tan callus (Tc) were also isolated from hc. Optimal BA levels for shoot regeneration from lines Gc and Wc were 2 and 5 mg·liter−1, respectively. No normal shoots could be regenerated from Tc. The phenotypes of these cell lines remained stable for 24 subculture generations. The hc line that initially required BA for growth became hormone autotrophic whereas the other lines did not. Culturing using Gelrite and sealing vessels with parafilm promoted vitrification of the hc line. Culturing using GIBCO agar and unsealed vessels reduced vitrification. The ex-vitro greenhouse survival rates for hc and Rhc plantlets were 10 and 80%, respectively. The large size of the Rhc shoots apparently resulted in significantly higher survival rates under greenhouse conditions, but did not result in any phenotypic whole plant changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bayer, M. D. The newHaworthia handbook. National Botanic Gardens of South Africa; 1982:124.

  2. Bottcher, I.; Zoglauer, K.; Goring, H. Induction and reversion of vitrification of plants culturedin vitro. Physiol. Plant 72:560–564; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fox, J. E. Growth factor requirements and chromosome number in tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant 16:793–803; 1963.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaminek, M.; Lustinec, J. Reduced chlorophyll synthesis in cytokininautonomous strains of tobacco callus. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 73:65–73; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaul, K.; Sabharwal, P. S. Morphogenetic studies onHaworthia: establishment of tissue culture and control of differentiation. Am. J. Bot. 59:377–385; 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant 15:473–497; 1962.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ogihara, Y. Characterization of chromosomal changes in calluses induced by callus cloning and para-fluorophenylalanine (PFP) treatment and regenerates from them. Proc. 5th Intl. Cong. Plant Tissue & Cell Culture. Plant Tissue Culture. Tokyo, Japan: Japanese Association for Plant Tissue Culture; 1982:439–440.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ogihara, Y.; Tsunewaki, K. Tissue culture inHaworthia. III. Occurrence of callus variants during subcultures and its mechanism. Jpn. J. Genet. 54:271–293; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Singh, B. D.; Harvey, B. L.; Kao, K. N., et al. Selection pressure in cell populations ofVicia hajastana cultured in vitro. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 14:65–70; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Standifer, L. C.; O’Rourke, E. N.; Porche-Sorbet, R. Propagation ofHaworthia from floral scapes. Plant Propagator 30:4–6; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Steel, R. G. D.; Torrie, J. H. Observations. In: Steel, R. G. D.; Torrie, J. H., eds. Principles and procedures of statistics with special reference to the biological sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1960:7–31.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Syono, K.; Furuya, T. Induction of auxin nonrequiring tobacco calluses and its reversal by treatments with auxin. Plant Cell Physiol. 15:7–17; 1974.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wessels, D. C.; Groenewald, E. G.; Koeleman, A. Callus formation and subsequent shoot and root development from leaf tissue ofHaworthia planifolia cf. var.setulifera v. Poelln. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. Bd. 78:141–145; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zimmerman, T. W.; Rogers, S. M. D.; Cobb, B. G. Controlling vitrification of petuniain vitro. In Vitro Plant Cell. Dev. Biol. 27:165–167; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dethier Rogers, S.M. Culture phenotype affects on regeneration capacity in the monocotHaworthia comptoniana . In Vitro Cell Dev Biol - Plant 29, 9–12 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02632232

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02632232

Key words

Navigation