Skip to main content
Log in

Establishment and characterization of a cell line from the american opossum (Didelphys virginiana)

  • Published:
In Vitro Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A permanent tissue-cultured cell line (designated OK) has been established from kidney tissue of an adult American opossum. The OK line has been characterized with respect to morphology, chromosome constitution, tissue-culture requirements, and attainable mitotic arrest. The cells are epithelial-like with a stable nondiploid chromosomal modal number of 23. Cells grown in Eagle's minimal essential medium with 10% fetal bovine serum have a mean doubling time of 18 hr. The cell line OK is potentially useful for the isolation and purification of the mammalian X chromosome because of the size differential between the smaller X's and the larger autosomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stubblefield, E., and W. Wray. 1973. Biochemical and morphological studies of partially purified Chinese hamster chromosomes. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 38: 835–843.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hanson, C. B. 1975. Techniques in the isolation and fractionation of eukaryotic chromosomes. In: H. R. Pain, and B. J. Smith (Eds.),New Techniques in Biophysics and Cell Biology. Vol. 2. John Wiley & Sons, London.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Riggs, A. D. 1975. X inactivation, differentiation, and DNA methylation. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 14: 9–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Deavan, L. L., E. Stubblefield, and J. H. Jett. 1976. Karyotype analysis of Chinese hamster chromosomes by flow microfluorometry. In: M. L. Mendelsohn (Ed.),Automation of Cytogenetics. Asilomar Workshop sponsored by the Energy Research and Development Administration. National Technical Information, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Springfield, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thrasher, J. D. 1972. Marsupial cells in vivo and in vitro. Methods Cell Physiol. 5: 127–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sinha, A. K., S. Kakati, and S. Pathak. 1972. Exclusive localization of C-bands within opossum sex chromosomes. Exp. Cell Res. 75: 265–267.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sinha, A. D., S. Kakati, and S. Pathak. 1968. Opossum lymphocytes in vitro: a valuable tool for cytogenetic investigations. Cytogenetics 7: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sinha, A. K., and S. Kakati. 1976. C- and G-bands of the opossum chromosomes: Terminal sequences of DNA replication. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 18: 195–205.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown, S., M. Teplitz, and Jean-Paul Revel. 1974. Interaction of mycoplasmas with cell cultures, as visualized by electron microscopy. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71: 464–468.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, T. R. 1975. A simple, rapid procurement to detect mycoplasma contamination in cell cultures. Mamm. Chromosome Newslett. 16: 136–144.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karnovsky, M. J. 1965. A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolarity for use in electron microscopy (abstr.). J. Cell Biol. 27: 137.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Farquhar, M., and G. E. Palade. 1965. Cell functions in amphibian skin. J. Cell Biol. 26: 263–291.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Reynolds, G. S. 1963. The use of led citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 17: 208–212.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hsu, T. C. 1973. Constitutive heterochromatin (C-band) technique. In: T. Casperson, and L. Zech (Eds.),Chromosome Identification: Techniques and Applications in Biology and Medicine. Nobel Symposium 23. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Porter, K., D. Prescott, and J. Frye. 1973. Changes in surface morphology of Chinese hamster ovary cells during the cell cycle. J. Cell Biol. 57: 815–836.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hayflick, L., and P. S. Moorhead. 1961. The serial cultivation of human diploid cell strains. Exp. Cell Res. 25: 585–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stubblefield, E., and R. R. Klevecz. 1965. Synchronization of Chinese hamster cells by reversal of Colcemid inhibition. Exp. Cell Res. 40: 660–664.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tobey, R. A., E. C. Anderson, and D. F. Petersen. 1967. Properties of mitotic cells prepared by mechanically shaking monolayer cultures of Chinese hamster cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 70: 63–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Allenspach, A. L., and L. E. Roth. 1967. Structural variations during mitosis in the chick embryo. J. Cell Biol. 133: 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Buck, R. C., and A. Krishan. 1965. Sites of membrane growth during cleavage of amphibian epithelial cells. Exp. Cell Res. 38: 426–428.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hsu, T. C., D. Billen, and A. Levan. 1961. Mammalian chromosomes in vitro. XV. Patterns of transformation. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 27: 515–541.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Moore, R., and J. Uren. 1966. Permanent cell lines of the marsupial mouseAutechinus swainsonii. Exp. Cell Res. 44: 273–282.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schneider, L. K., and W. O. Rieke. 1967. DNA replication patterns and chromosomal protein synthesis in opossum lymphocytes in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 33: 497–509.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by NIH grant HD-04420.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koyama, H., Goodpasture, C., Miller, M.M. et al. Establishment and characterization of a cell line from the american opossum (Didelphys virginiana). In Vitro 14, 239–246 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02616032

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02616032

Key words

Navigation