Abstract
To determine the appropriateness of use of omeprazole, all outpatient prescriptions over one year from a single county hospital pharmacy were analyzed. Appropriateness of omeprazole use was assessed by literature review and expert opinion. Two hundred twenty-one prescriptions were evaluated; 112 (56%) were inappropriate. Women received more inappropriate prescriptions (61% vs 44%, p=0.01) and received endoscopy less frequently (52% vs 71%, p<0.02) than did men. When age, gender, and prescribing clinic were examined as predictors of inappropriate use, only gender was significant (OR=2.01, 95% CI=1.52–2.66). This study, from a single institution, showed a high rate of inappropriate omeprazole use.
References
Maton PN. Drug therapy: omeprazole. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:965–75.
Ayanian JZ, Epstein AM. Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:221–5.
Steingart RN, Packer M, Hamm P, et al. Sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:226–30.
Krumholz HM, Douglas PS, Lauer MS, Pasternak RC. Selection of patients for coronary angiography and coronary revascularization early after myocardial infarction: is there evidence for a gender bias? Ann Intern Med. 1991;116:785–90.
Committee on Aging Congressional Research Service. Chart #1 Senate Print 10250. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor and Statistics, 1980–1992.
Snesil NR, Weinstein ML, Ashworth JC, et al. 1993 Red Book. Montvale, NJ: Medical Economics Data, 1993.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received from the Department of Medicine and Program in Clinical Epidemiology, Effectiveness and Policy, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brandhagen, D.J., Pheley, A.M., Onstad, G.R. et al. Omeprazole use at an urban county teaching hospital. J Gen Intern Med 10, 513–515 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02602404
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02602404