Skip to main content
Log in

Telephone medicine

A general internal medicine experience

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While a substantial number of patient contacts with internists occur over the telephone, there is little information about the nature and content of these encounters. The authors surveyed patient-initiated phone calls that resulted in a physician response for seven general internists. Over a six-month period, 1,377 telephone encounters met inclusion criteria. Calls were generally short, 73% lasting 4 minutes or less; mean time per call was 3.4 minutes. The doctor spoke to the patient directly 79% of the time and to a relative in 15% of the calls. The most common reason for phoning the doctor was a symptom or medical complaint (45% of all calls), followed by questions about test results (16%) and medication queries (14%). Over 60% of calls dealt with chronic conditions. Diagnoses encountered over the telephone were similar in frequency to those seen in outpatient clinic visits; however, a notable proportion of calls dealt with topics beyond the scope of traditional internal medicine training programs. A medication response was the reason for 22% of the phone calls. The doctors recommended changes in follow up 12% of the time; these included early visits to the clinic, evaluation in the emergency room, and direct admission to the hospital. An appreciation of the scope of telephone medicine in terms of both medical skills applied and time committed is germane to trainees and practitioners alike.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gorrell RL. Taming the terrible telephone. Physicians Management. 1978;18:40–4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gilmore A. How good is your office telephone system? Can Med Assoc J. 1984;130:1047, 1049.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Samuel O. What annoys me most. The telephone. Br Med J. 1983;297:1599–600.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Murphy D, Dineen E. Nursing by telephone. Am J Nurs. 1976;75:1137–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Strain JE, Miller JD. The preparation, utilization and evaluation of a registered nurse trained to give telephone advice in a private pediatric office. Pediatrics. 1971;47:1051–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Perrin EC, Goodman HC. Telephone management of acute pediatric illnesses. N Engl J Med. 1978;298:130–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown JM, Helling DK, Alexander MM, Burmeister LF. Comparative evaluation of clinical pharmacists and physicians in the management of medication-related telephone calls in family practice offices. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1982;39:437–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hessel SJ, Haggerty RJ. General pediatrics: a study of practice in the mid-1960s. J Pediatr. 1968;73:271–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Spencer DC, Daugird AJ. The nature and content of physician telephone calls in a private practice. J Fam Pract. 1988; 27:201–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hallam L. You’ve got a lot to answer for, Mr. Bell. A review of the use of the telephone in primary care. Fam Pract. 1989;6:47–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Curtis P, Talbot A. The telephone in primary care. J Comm Health. 1981;6:194–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mendenhall RC, Lloyd JS, Repicky PA, Monson JR, Girard RA, Abrahamson S. A national study of medical and surgical specialties. Description of the study instrument. JAMA. 1978;240:1160–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jones J, Clark W, Bradford J, Dougherty J. Efficacy of a telephone follow-up system in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 1988;6:249–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wood PR. Pediatric residency training in telephone management; a survey of training programs in the United States. Pediatrics. 1986;77:822–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fleming MF, Skochelak SE, Curtis P, Evens S. Evaluating the effectiveness of a telephone medicine curriculum. Med Care. 1988;26:211–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dunn EV, Norton PG, Dunn RC. Using simulated patients to teach family practice residents to manage patients by telephone. J Med Educ. 1987;62:524–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Barker LR. Distinctive characteristics of ambulatory medicine. In: Barker LR, Burton JR, Zieve PD. Principles of ambulatory medicine, 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1986;3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Greenlick MR, Freeborn DK, Gambill GL, Pope CR. Determinants of medical care utilization: the role of the telephone in total medical care. Med Care. 1973;11:121–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fischer PM, Smith SR. The nature and management of telephone utilization in a family practice setting. J Fam Pract. 1979;8:321–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sloan PD, Egelhoff C, Curtis P, McGaghie W, Evens S. Physician decision making over the telephone. J Fam Pract. 1985; 21:279–84.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brown JM, Helling DK, Burns EA, Burmeister LF, Rakel RE. Patient care telephone calls received in family practice offices. J Fam Pract. 1982;14:527–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Westbury RC. The electric speaking practice: a telephone workload study. Can Fam Phys. 1974;20:69–76.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Harr E, Halitsky V, Stricker G. Factors related to the preference for a female gynecologist. Med Care. 1975;13:782–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cooke M, Ronalds C. Women doctors in urban general practice: the patients. Br Med J. 1985;290:753–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received from the Division of General and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, and the Department of Family Practice, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, B.E., Johnson, C.A. Telephone medicine. J Gen Intern Med 5, 234–239 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600541

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600541

Key words

Navigation