Skip to main content
Log in

Establishing a quality improvement process for identification of psychosocial problems in a primary care practice

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives:A quality improvement process that will significantly increase the rate of identification of psychosocial problems through routine use of case-finding instruments can be established in a general medicine practice.

Design:Two groups of patient examination reports written by physicians were retrospectively compared with the patients’ responses on the case-finding database instrument. The samples were obtained by sequential selection in four time periods.

Setting and Patients:The study occurred in a university general internal medicine practice that utilizes the problem-oriented record. The patients studied were seen for first-time comprehensive examinations designed to identify all important bealth problems, including psychosocial problems.

Intervention:The authors compared performances of the physicians in identification of psychosocial problems before and after the intervention, which consisted of a pilot study audit of psychosocial problem identification, establishment of standards for interpretation of the case-finding instrument, design of a flow sheet to make case-finding data clearly available to the physician at each comprebensive examination, and feedback of physician performance according to practice-adopted standards for identification of psychosocial problems.

Measurement:The result of the intervention was an increase in psychosocial problem identification from 67% to 90% of problems present, p<0.05 by chi-square distribution; or a decrease from 33% to 10% in psychosocial problems missed by the physicians.

Conclusion:The quality improvement process for identification of psychosocial problems described in this report significantly increased the rate of identification of psychosocial problems by general internists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Good MD, Good BJ, Cleary PD. Do patient attitudes influence physician recognition of psychosocial problems in primary care? J Fam Pract. 1987;25:53–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldberg RJ. Depression in primary care: DSM-III diagnoses and other depressive syndromes. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:491–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jones LR, Badger LW, Ficken RP, Leeper JD, Anderson RL. Inside the hidden mental health network: examining mental health care delivery of primary care physicians. Gen Hosp Psychiat. 1987;9:287–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ashworth CD, Williamson P, Montano D. A scale to measure beliefs about psychosocial aspects of patient care. Soc Sci Med. 1984;19:1235–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kessler LG, Cleary PD, Burke JD. Psychiatric disorders in primary care. Arch Gen Psychiat. 1985;42:583–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Von Korff M, Shapiro S, Burke JD, et al. Anxiety and depression in a primary care clinic. Arch Gen Psychiat. 1987;44:152–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nielsen AC, Williams TA. Depression in ambulatory medical patients. Arch Gen Psychiat. 1980;37:999–1004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Katon W, Kleinman A, Rosen G. Depression and somatization: a review. Part I. Am J Med. 1982;72:127–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Katon W, Kleinman A, Rosen G. Depression and somatization: a review. Part II. Am J Med. 1982;72:241–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Coulehan JL, Schulberg HC, Block MR. The efficiency of depression questionnaires for case finding in primary medical care. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:541–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamerow DB. Is screening for mental health problems worth-while in family practice? J Fam Pract. 1987;25:181–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tufo HM. Beyond medical mystique—the system is the solution for obtaining patient participation.In Zurhellen JH, ed. Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference on Patient Education in the Primary Care Setting. Memphis: University of Tennessee, Department of Family Medicine, 1981;15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tufo H, Bouchard RE, Rubin AS, et al. Problem-oriented approach to practice. I. Economic impact. JAMA, 1977;238:414–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tufo H, Bouchard RE, Rubin AS, Twitchell JC, VanBuren HC, Bedard L. Problem-oriented approach to practice. II. Development of the system through audit and implication. JAMA. 1977;238:502–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tufo HM. Better patient care through self-assessment. Patient Care. 1980; Feb 15;182–98.

    Google Scholar 

  16. PROMIS III: adult medical history questionnaire for problem oriented practices. Princeton, NJ: Project Masters, Inc., 1982.

  17. Okimoto JT. Screening for depression in geriatric medical patients. Am J Psychiat. 1982;139:799–802.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoffer A. Diagnosing depression. J Orthomolecular Psychiat. 1978;7:177–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rhodes RH. A further look at the popoff index of depression. Psychol Rep. 1978;42;309–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Berndt SM, Berndt DJ, Byars WD. A multi-institutional study of depression in family practice. Fam Pract. 1983;16:83–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Holmes TH, Rahe RH. The social readjustment rating scale. J Psychosom Res. 1967;2:213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gropper M. Family medicine and psychosocial knowledge: how many hats can the family doctor wear? Soc Sci Med. 1987;25:1249–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bouchard RE, Tufo HM, Beaty HN. The impact of a quality assurance program on postgraduate training in internal medicine. JAMA. 1985;253:1146–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gerber PD, Barrett J, Barrett J, Manheimer E, Whiting R, Smith R. Recognition of depression by internists in primary care: a comparison of internist and “gold standard” psychiatric assessments. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:7–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Goldberg D, Steele JJ, Johnson A, Smith C. Ability of primary care physicians to make accurate ratings of psychiatric symptoms. Arch Gen Psychiat. 1982;39;829–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Marks JN, Goldberg DP, Hillier VF. Determinants of the ability of general practitioners to detect psychiatric illness. Psychol Med. 1979; 9:337–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hase HD, Luger JA. Screening for psychosocial problems in primary care. J Fam Pract. 1988;26:297–302.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. McDowell I. Screening for psychosocial problems among primary care patients: a pilot study. Can Med Assoc J. 1987;137:1095–100.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bingham, R.L., Plante, D.A., Bronson, D.L. et al. Establishing a quality improvement process for identification of psychosocial problems in a primary care practice. J Gen Intern Med 5, 342–346 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600403

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600403

Key words

Navigation