Skip to main content
Log in

Practice guidelines

What are internists looking for?

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine features of the presentation of clinical practice guidelines that may enhance their use by internists, we conducted a cross-sectional survey to which 1,513 (60%) of 2,513 eligible internists responded. Endorsements by respected colleagues and by major organizations were identified as very important by 72% and 69% of respondents, respectively. Respondents preferred short pamphlets and manuals summarizing a number of guidelines and felt that concise recommendations (86%), synopsis of supporting evidence (85%), and quantification of benefit (77%) were important in guideline presentation. We conclude that guideline developers should gain the endorsement of major organizations and present key aspects in brief, easily assimilated formats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993;342:1317–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Weingarten SR, Riedinger MS, Conner L, et al. Practice guidelines and reminders to reduce duration of hospital stay for patients with chest pain. An interventional trial. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:257–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tunis SR, Hayward RSA, Wilson MC, et al. Internists’ attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:956–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lomas J, Haynes RB. A taxonomy and critical review of tested strategies for the application of clinical practice recommendations: from “official” to “individual” clinical policy. Am J Prev Med. 1988;4:77–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kosecoff J, Kanouse DE, Rogers WH, McCloskey L, Winslow CM, Brook RH. Effects of the National Institutes of Health consensus development program on physician practice. JAMA. 1987;258:2708–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lomas J, Anderson GM, Domnick-Pierre K, Vayda E, Enkin MW, Hannah WJ. Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1306–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Romm FJ, Fletcher SW, Hulka BS. The periodic health examination: comparison of recommendations and internists’ performance. South Med J. 1981;74:265–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen SJ, Weinberger M, Hui SL, et al. The impact of reading on physicians’ nonadherence to recommended standards of medical care. Soc Sci Med. 1985;21:909.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Maiman LA, Greenland P, Hildreth NG, Cox C. Patterns of physicians’ treatments for referral patients from public cholesterol screening. Am J Prev Med. 1991;7:273–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Evidence for the effectiveness of CME. A review of 50 randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1992;268:1111–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by the American College of Physicians and the Johns Hopkins University /Francis Scott Key Faculty Development Program (HRSA grant 2D28 PE 53014-07). Dr. Bass also received support as the American College of Physicians’ Teaching and Research Scholar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hayward, R.S.A., Wilson, M.C., Tunis, S.R. et al. Practice guidelines. J Gen Intern Med 11, 176–178 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600272

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600272

Key words

Navigation