Skip to main content
Log in

Ambulatory health services provided to low-income and homeless adult patients in a major community health center

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The homeless are more likely than other poor and vulnerable populations to manifest serious health problems. Early research focused on needs assessments of this population; current work has shifted to examine issues of access, use of health services, and barriers to care. However, current research has not examined whether model clinics designed for the homeless have created parity with their low-income domiciled peers in terms of provision of ambulatory services. Such data are increasingly in demand as managed care looms just over the political horizon as a means of providing services to low-income patients.

SETTING: A major community ambulatory health center in West Los Angeles.

PATIENTS: Homeless (N=210) and low-income domiciled (N=250) patients.

DESIGN: A medical record review of care provided over a one-year period to homeless and low-income domiciled adult patients in a major community ambulatory health center in West Lost Angeles was conducted. Data were collected on length of visits, laboratory tests, procedures, and services, immunizations, specialty clinic referrals, medications, and travel vouchers.

RESULTS: On average, homeless patients were provided with as many outside laboratory tests per patient as low-income domiciled patients (1.1 vs 1.3). Further, they returned for more visits (3.4 vs 2.9), were more likely to have had longer visits (88% vs 61%), and were provided with more laboratory tests (2.3 vs 1.7), procedures and services (3.1 vs 1.1), referrals (1.3 vs 0.7), medications (4.4 vs 3.3), and travel vouchers (0.6 vs 0.2) (allp<.01). Many of the procedures and services received by the homeless were for nonmedical assistance. Preventive health services such as tuberculosis skin tests, sexually transmitted disease (STD) screening, and Pap tests were provided to both homeless and domiciled patients at low rates.

CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study on the provision of care in a major West Los Angeles community health center indicate that homeless patients receiving care from a model program designed to address their special needs will return for follow-up visits and will utilize services at least as much as low-income domiciled patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wright JD, Weber E. Homelessness and Health. Washington, DC: McGraw-Hill Healthcare Information Center, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brickner PW, Scanlan BC, Conanan B, et al. Homeless persons and health care. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104:405–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Reuler JB, Bax MJ, Sampson JH. Physician house call services for medically needy, inner-city residents. Am J Public Health. 1986;76:1131–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brickner PW, Scharer LK, Conanan BA, et al. Under the safety net: the health and social welfare of the homeless in the United States. New York: WW Norton, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. National Directory of Homeless Health Care Projects. (Section 340 of the Public Health Service Act). Washington, DC: The National Association of Community Health Centers, 1990.

  6. Fischer PJ, Shapiro S, Breakey WR, et al. Mental health and social characteristics of the homeless: a survey of mission users. Am J Public Health. 1986;76:519–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wright JD, Rossi PH, Knight JW. Homelessness and health: the effects of life style on physical well-being among homeless people in New York City. Res Soc Probl Public Policy. 1987;4:41–72.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wlodarczyk D, Prentice R. Health issues of homeless persons. West J Med. 1988;148:717–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Martell JV, Seitz RS, Harada JK, et al. Hospitalization in an urban homeless population: the Honolulu Urban Homeless Project. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:299–303.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Winkleby MA. Comparison of risk factors for ill health in a sample of homeless and non-homeless poor. Public Health Rep. 1990;105:404–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferenchick GS. Medical problems of homeless and non-homeless persons attending an inner-city clinic: a comparative study. Am J Med Sci. 1991;301:379–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Linn LS, Gelberg L, Leake B. Substance abuse and mental health status of homeless and domiciled low-income users of a medical clinic. Hosp Commun Psych. 1990;41:306–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gelberg L, Linn LS, Smith MH. Health, homelessness, and poverty. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:2325–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gelberg L, Linn LS. Assessing the physical health of homeless adults. JAMA. 1989;262:1973–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brickner PW, Sharer LK, Conanan BA, et al.Health Care of Homeless People. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Padgett D, Struening EL, Andrews H. Factors affecting the use of medical, mental health, alcohol, and drug treatment services by homeless adults. Med Care. 1990;28:805–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Doblin BH. Gelberg L, Freeman HE. Patient care and medical staffing patterns in climes serving the homeless. JAMA. 1992;267:698–701.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Robertson MJ, Cousineau MR. Health status and access to health services among the urban homeless. Am J Public Health. 1986;76:561–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gelberg L, Linn LS, Users of mental health services: a portrait of homeless adults. Hosp Commun Psych 1988;39:51 CM5.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cohen MA, Dronska H. Treatment refusal in a rootless individual with medical problems. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1988;10:61–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosenbaum S, Darnell J. Medicaid Section 1115 demonstration waivers: approved and proposed activities as of November 1994. Washington, DC: Kaiser Commission on the Future of Medicaid, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Perkins J, Melden M. The advocacy challenge of a lifetime: shaping Medicaid waivers to serve the poor. Clearinghouse Rev. 1994;28:864–85.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fisher RS. Medicaid managed care: the next generation? Acad Med. 1994;69:317–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Roth D, Bean J, Lust N, Saveanu T. Homelessness in Ohio: a study of people in need. Columbus, OH: The Ohio Department of Mental Health Office of Program Evaluation and Research, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis. Prevention and control of tuberculosis among homeless persons. MMWR 1992;41(RR-5):13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wood D. Delivering Health Care to Homeless Persons. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Institute of Medicine: Committee on Health Care for Homeless People. Homelessness, Health, and Human Needs. Washington, DC: Academy Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was partially funded by the National Research Service Award, Individual Fellowship of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR), Rockville, Maryland. The views expressed here are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect those of AHCPR.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gelberg, L., Doblin, B.H. & Leake, B.D. Ambulatory health services provided to low-income and homeless adult patients in a major community health center. J Gen Intern Med 11, 156–162 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600268

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600268

Key words

Navigation