Abstract
To evaluate the impact of patient characteristics and method of data collection on satisfaction results used for the comparison of practice locations, questionnaires were distributed to 1,208 adult outpatients at five medicine clinics, either onsite or by mail. Patient dissatisfaction with three service domains was measured: communication with the provider, courtesy of the office staff, and timeliness of care. Practice location, survey methodology, and patient characteristics were significant predictors of dissatisfaction, and adjustment for the latter two factors affected the rankings of practices by dissatisfaction rates for all three domains. Further study of the impact of patient characteristics and method of data collection should be conducted before the comparison of unadjusted satisfaction results becomes the accepted standard.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Cleary PD, McNeil BJ. Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. Inquiry. 1988;25:25–36.
Kurata JH, Nogawa AN, Phillips DM, Hoffman S, Werblun MN. Patient and provider satisfaction with medical care. J Family Pract. 1992;35:176–9.
Cleary PD, Edgman-Levitan S, McMullen W, Delbanco TL. The relationship between reported problems and patient summary evaluations of hospital care. QRB. 1992;18:53–9.
Cherkin DC, Hart G, Rosenblatt RA. Patient satisfaction with family physicians and general internists: is there a difference? J Family Pract. 1988;26:543–51.
Like R, Zyzanski SJ. Patient satisfaction with the clinical encounter: social psychological determinants. Soc Sci Med. 1987;24:351–7.
Fitzpatrick R. Questionnaires of patient satisfaction, II: designing a questionnaire and conducting a survey. BMJ. 1991;302:1129–32.
Linder-Pelz S, Stewart MM. Patient satisfaction with outpatient primary health care in a metropolitan medical center. Am J Prev Med. 1986;2:89–96.
Zastowny TR, Roghmann KJ, Hengst A. Satisfaction with medical care: replications and theoretic reevaluation. Med Care. 1983;21:294–322.
Fisk TA, Brown CJ, Cannizzaro K, Natfal B. Creating patient satisfaction and loyalty. J Health Care Marketing. 1990;10:5–15.
Ali ME. A study of patient satisfaction as an evaluation parameter for utilization of primary health care services. J R Soc Health. 1992;112:64–7.
Dull VT, Lansky D, Davis N. Evaluating a patient satisfaction survey for maximum benefit. J Quality Improvement. 1994;20:444–52.
Cleveland hospital surveys outpatients. Hosp Patient Relations. 1992;7:3–4.
McLeod PJ, Tambyln R, Benaroya S, Snell L. Faculty ratings of resident humanism predict patient satisfaction ratings in ambulatory medical clinics. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:321–6.
Matulich E, Finn DW. Determinant criteria in patient satisfaction surveys. J Ambulatory Care Manage. 1989;12:45–51.
Stier R. The economics of patient satisfaction. Health Care Forum J. 1987;30:19–25.
Casarreal KM, Mills JI, Plant MA. Improving services through patient surveys in a multihospital organization. Hosp Health Services Admin. March/April 1986:41–52.
Population and Housing Report. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau 1990.
Walker AH, Restuciaa JD. Obtaining information on patient satisfaction with hospital care: mail versus telephone. Health Services Res. 1984;19:291–306.
Osterweis M, Howell JR. Administering patient satisfaction questionnaires at diverse ambulatory care site. J Ambulatory Care Manage. 1979;2:67–88.
McHorney CA, Kosinski M, Ware JE. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. Med Care. 1994;32:551–67.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by the Department of Quality Measurement and Improvement, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harpole, L.H., Orav, E.J., Hickey, M. et al. Patient satisfaction in the ambulatory setting. J Gen Intern Med 11, 431–434 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600192
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600192