Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To measure primary care physicians’ familiarity with, attitudes toward, and confidence in preventive care practice guidelines for the elderly and to determine whether their attitudes are associated with implementation of guidelines into clinical practice.
DESIGN: A self-administered survey of physicians employed by a health maintenance organization (HMO) and of patients cared for by those physicians. Medical records were also reviewed to assess compliance with practice guidelines.
SETTING: An HMO in Southern California.
PARTICIPANTS: Forty-eight primary care physicians completed the survey (100% response rate). The medical records of 3,249 randomly selected elderly patients (65 to 75 years old) were studied. Of these patients, 2,799 completed a preventive care survey (response rate 86.1%).
MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS: Most HMO primary care physicians agreed or strongly agreed that guidelines will improve quality of medical care (88%) and that guidelines have caused them to change their care of patients (73%). Although the physicians’ general attitudes about guidelines did not often correlate with their use of preventive care guidelines, the physicians who stated that practice guidelines had changed their practices were more likely to offer their patients clinical breast examinations (75.9% vs 67.2%, p=0.04) and to counsel their patients to exercise (70% vs 58%, p=0.01) than were the physicians who did not. There was a significant association between physicians’ support for and adoption of specific practice guidelines regarding mammography (r=0.34, p=0.02) and immunizations against influenza (r=0.42, p<0.005), pneumococcal pneumonia (r=0.47, p<0.001), and tetanus (r= 0.31, p=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians employed by an HMO were familiar with and hopeful about the role of guidelines for improving patient care. Physicians’ attitudes toward specific preventive care guidelines and admission that guidelines had caused them to change their practice did at times, but not always, correlate with their implementation of guidelines into clinical practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Woolf SH. Practice guidelines: a new reality in medicine. I. Recent developments. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:1811–8.
Field MJ. Lohr KN (eds). Guidelines for Clinical Practice: from Development to Use. Washington, DC: Institute for Medicine, National Academy Press, 1992.
American Medical Association. Directory of Practice Parameters. Titles, Sources, and Updates. Chicago: American Medical Association, 1993.
Audet AM. Greenfield S, Field M. Medical practice guidelines: current activities and future directions. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:709–14.
US House of Representatives. Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989: Conference Report to Accompany HR 3299. Washington, DC: US Congress. Nov 21. 1989.
Clinton B. The Clinton health care plan. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:804–7.
Brook RH. Practice guidelines and practicing medicine: are they compatible? JAMA. 1989;262:3027–30.
Lomas J. Anderson GM, Domnick-Pierre K, Vayda E. Enkin MW, Hannah WJ. Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1306–11.
Kosecoff J. Kanouse DE, Rogers WH, McCloskey L, Winslow CM, Brook RH. Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on physician practice. JAMA. 1987;258:2708. 13.
Weingarten S, Riedinger MS. Conner L, Johnson E. Ellrodt AG. Reducing coronary care unit lengths of stay with a practice guideline for congestive heart failure patients—insights from a controlled clinical trial. Med Care, (in press).
Grilli R, Apolone G, Marsoni S, Nicolucci A, Zola P, Liberati A. The impact of patient management guidelines on the care of breast, colorectal, and ovarian cancer patients in Italy. Med Care. 1991;29:50–63.
Pierre KD, Vayda E. Lomas J, Enkin MW, Hannah WJ, Anderson GM. Obstetrical attitudes and practices before and after the Canadian Consensus Conference Statement on Cesarean Birth. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32:1283–9.
Weingarten S. Agocs L. Tankel N, Sheng A. Ellrodt AG. Reducing lengths of stay for patients hospitalized with chest pain using medical practice guidelines and opinion leaders. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71:259–62.
Weingarten SR, Riedinger MS. Conner L. et al. Practice guidelines and reminders to reduce duration of hospital stay for patients with chest pain. An interventional trial. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:257–63.
Eagle KA. Mulley AG. Skates SJ. et al. Length of stay in the intensive care unit: effects of practice guidelines and feedback. JAMA. 1990;264:992–7.
Wachtel TJ, O’Sullivan P. Practice guidelines to reduce testing in the hospital. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5:335–41.
Hayward RSA. Steinberg EP, Ford DE, Roizen MF, Roach KW. Preventive care guidelines: 1991. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:758–83.
Tunis SR. Hayward RSA. Wilson MC. et al. Internists’ attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:956–63.
Woo B. Woo B. Cook EF. Weisberg M. Goldman L. Screening procedures in the asymptomatic adult. Comparison of physicians’ recommendations, patients’ desires, published guidelines, and actual practice. JAMA. 1985;254:1480–4.
Romm FJ, Fletcher SW. Hulka BS. The periodic health examination: comparison of recommendations and internists’ performance. South Med J. 1981;74:265–71.
Litzelman DK. Dittus RS. Miller ME, Tierney WM. Requiring physicians to respond to computerized reminders improves their compliance with preventive care protocols. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:311–7.
McDonald CJ. Hui SL. Smith DM. et al. Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 1984;100:130–8.
Whiting-O’Keefe QE, Henke C, Simborg DW. Choosing the correct unit of analysis in Medical Care experiments. Med Care. 1984;22:1101–14.
Friedman P. GB-Stat. Version 3.0 Silver Spring, MD: Dynamic Microsystems. 1991.
Selker HP. Criteria for adoption in practice of medical practice guidelines. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71:339–41.
Burack RC. Liang J. The early detection of cancer in the primary-care setting: factors associated with the acceptance and completion of recomended procedures. Prev Med. 1987;16:739–51.
McPhee SJ. Bird JA. Implementation of cancer prevention guidelines in clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5(S/O suppl):Sl16-S122.
Wechsler H, Levine S. Idelson RK, Rohman M, Taylor JO. The physician’s role in health promotion-a survey of primary-care practitioners. N Engl J Med. 1983;308:97–100.
Anda RF, Remington PL. Sienko DG, Davis RM. Are physicians advising smokers to quit? The patient’s perspective. JAMA. 1987;257:1916–9.
Turner BJ. Day SC. Borenstein B. A controlled trial to improve delivery of preventive care: physician or patient reminders? J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:403–9.
Brook RH, Fink A, Kosecoff J. et al. Educating physicians and treating patients in the ambulatory setting. Where are we going and how will we know when we arrive? Ann Intern Med. 1987;107:392–8.
McPhee SJ. Richard RJ, Solkowitz SN. Performance of cancer screening in a university general internal medicine practice: comparison with the 1980 American Cancer Society guidelines. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1:275–81.
Starfield B. Simpson L. Primary care as part of US health services reform. JAMA. 1993;269:3136–9.
Iglehart JL. The American health care system: managed care. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:742–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received from the Southern California Permanente Medical Group and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and Cedars-Sinai Research Institute, Los Angeles, California; the Office of Technology Assessment, Health Program, United States Congress, Washington, DC; and the Health Information Research Unit, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Supported by a Grant from the Sidney Garfield Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weingarten, S., Stone, E., Hayward, R. et al. The adoption of preventive care practice guidelines by primary care physicians. J Gen Intern Med 10, 138–144 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599668
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599668