Skip to main content
Log in

Learning by internal medicine residents

Differences and similarities of perceptions by residents and faculty

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To learn about what enhances or hinders learning in postgraduate medical education.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Through the use of critical incident interviews, 20 internal medicine residents and 20 attending physicians/faculty were asked to describe specific situations where resident learning had occurred and where it had not occurred.

SETTING: A large teaching hospital in the Midwest.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Factors positively associated with learning were mentioned frequently (faculty involvement, interaction, and reflection in discussion), and others only rarely (knowing outcomes of effort, resident reading) by both the faculty and the residents. Others were mentioned more often by the residents (feeling relaxed) or by the faculty (technical rationality)!

CONCLUSIONS: Residents and attendings do not always agree as to what facilitates resident learning. Recognizing actions that residents believe facilitate learning may help faculty more effectively promote resident learning. Because of the similarities of resident training across the country, the results from this study can be applied to other programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Flanagan JC. The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull. 1954;4:327–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyatzis RE. The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rhee K. The critical incident interview and managerial competencies. Unpublished manuscript. Weatherhead School of Management. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Spencer L. Spencer S. Competence at Work: A Model for Superior Performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Motowidlo S. Carter GW, Dunnette MD, et al. Studies of the structured behavioral interview. J Appl Psychol. 1992;77:571–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kolb DA. Experiential Learning: Learning as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schon D. The Reflective Practioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books, 1987;36.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boyatzis R, Cowan S, Kolb DA. Reflections on curriculum innovation in higher education: the new Weatherhead MBA program. In: Sims R. Sims S (eds). Managing Institutions of Higher Education in the 21st Century. New York: Greenwood Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Craig JL. Teacher training for medical faculty and residents. Can Med Assoc J. 1988;15:949–57.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stritter F. Faculty evaluation and development. In: McGuire CH, Foley RP, Gorr A, et al. (eds). Handbook of Health Professions Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1983;294–318.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baker JD, Cooke JE, Conroy JM, Bromley HR. Hollon MF, Alpert CC. Beyond career choice: the role of learning style analysis in residency training. Med Educ. 1988;22:527–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

White, J.A., Anderson, P. Learning by internal medicine residents. J Gen Intern Med 10, 126–132 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599665

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599665

Key words

Navigation