Abstract
Objectives:1) To determine whether nurse evaluations of humanistic behavior discriminate between houseofficers in an internal medicine training program, and 2) to compare nurse and attending physician evaluations.
Design:Prospective, six-month comparison of nurse and attending ratings of houseofficer humanistic behavior.
Procedure:Using a six-item, Likert-scale bumanistic behavior rating form, nurses and ward attendings evaluated 76 PGY-1, PGY-2, and PGY-3 houseofficers over a six-month period. Nurses and attendings voluntarily evaluated houseofficers on all inpatient units in both university and Veterans Administration teaching hospitals.
Measurements and main results:Nurse ratings discriminated residents from one another throughout the six months of the study and over all units in both hospitals. Attending physician ratings were only moderately correlated with nurses’ and were significantly more lenient. Exploratory analyses of the nursing evaluations revealed that female houseofficers received significantly more favorable evaluations than did men and that ward nurses were significantly more lenient than were critical care nurses. Nurse ratings did not differ by hospital, training year, or month of evaluation.
Conclusions:Nurses can provide information about humanistic behavior that will allow program directors to discriminate among different levels of houseofficer behavior. Information from nurses differs from that provided by attending physicians. Nurse ratings are affected by gender and by the type of unit from which they are obtained.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
German PS. Compliance and chronic disease. Hypertension. 1988;11(suppl 2):II56-II60.
Becker MH. Patient adherence to prescribed therapies. Med Care. 1985;23:539–55.
Hall JA, Roter DL, Katz NR. Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters. Med Care. 1988;26:657–75.
Comstock LM, Hooper EM, Goodwin JM, Goodwin JS. Physician behaviors that correlate with patient satisfaction. J Med Educ. 1982;57:105–12.
A guide to awareness and evaluation of humanistic qualities in the internist. Portland, OR: American Board of Internal Medicine, 1985.
Mattern WD, Weinholtz D, Friedman CP. The attending physician as teacher. N Engl J Med. 1983;308:1129–32.
Shatney CH, Friend BE. Potential role of nurses in assessing houseofficer performance in the critical care environment. Crit Care Med. 1984;12:117–20.
Butterfield PS, Mazzaferri EL, Sachs LA. Nurses as evaluators of humanistic behavior of internal medicine residents. J Med Educ. 1987;62:842–9.
Blurton RR, Mazzaferri EL. Assessment of interpersonal skills and humanistic qualities in medical residents. J Med Educ. 1985;60:648–50.
Linn LS, Oye RK, Cope DW, DiMatteo MR. Use of nonphysician staff to evaluate humanistic behavior of internal medicine residents and faculty members. J Med Educ. 1986;61:918–20.
Siegel S. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.
Wilkinson L. SYSTAT: the System for Statistics. Evanston, IL: Systat, Inc., 1988.
Dickenson GE, Pearson AA. Sex differences of physicians in relating to dying patients. J Am Med Wom Assoc. 1979;34:45–7.
Wasserman RC, Inui TS, Barriatua RD, Carter WB, Lippincott P. Responsiveness to maternal concern in preventative child health visits: an analysis of clinician-parent interactions. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1983;4:171–6.
Day SC, Norcini JJ, Shea JA, Benson JA. Gender differences in the clinical competence of residents in internal medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:309–12.
Arnold RM, Martin SC, Parker RM. Taking care of patients—does it matter whether the physician is a woman? In: Women and medicine [special issue]. West J Med. 1988;149:729–33.
Evans BJ, Coman GJ, Stanley RO. Scores on the profile of nonverbal sensitivity: a sample of Australian medical students. Psychol Rep. 1988;62:903–6.
Zambrana RE, Mogel W, Scrimshaw SCM. Gender and level of training differences in obstetricians’ attitudes towards patients in childbirth. Women Health. 1987;12:5–24.
Schmitt BP, Rezler A, Micari H. Assessing humanistic qualities in medical residents. 25th Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education, New Orleans, 1986.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received from the Department of General Medicine and Primary Care, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia. At the time of this study Dr. Kaplan was with the University of Kentucky Department of Internal Medicine and Lexington Veterans Administration Hospital, Lexington, Kentucky.
Supported in part by a grant from the U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaplan, C.B., Centor, R.M. The use of nurses to evaluate houseofficers’ humanistic behavior. J Gen Intern Med 5, 410–414 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599428
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599428