Abstract
Objective:To compare the abilities of two methods for rapid detection of pyuria and three methods of urinalysis to predict significant bacteriuria in symptomatic ambulatory women.
Design:Prospective simultaneous comparison of the results of dipstick urinalysis, standard microscopic urinalysis, and hemocytometric cell counting and Gram staining with the results of a standard urine culture.
Setting:Two outpatient ambulatory care facilities serving predominantly minority and uninsured individuals.
Selection criteria:Nonpregnant women presenting with symptoms of urinary tract infection without symptoms of vaginal infection.
Measurements and main results:105 women with symptoms were evaluated. The sensitivities of the dipstick urinalysis and the microscopic urinalysis in predicting pyuria as defined by hemocytometry were 0.76 and 0.77, respectively, and their specificities were 0.94 and 0.97, respectively. The sensitivities and specificities of the three methods of urinalysis in predicting ≥10 4 colony-forming units (CFU)/mm 3 in a urine culture were 0.88 and 0.70 for the leukocyte esterase-nitrite dipstick urinalysis, 0.98 and 0.68 for the standard microscopic urinalysis, and 1.00 and 0.49 for the Gram staining and hemocytometric cell counting.
Conclusions:The standard urinalysis was the most accurate single method to predict significant bacteriuria in symptomatic ambulatory women. Sequencing the dipstick urinalysis with the standard urinalysis may be a cost-effective approach to evaluating these patients in clinical practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Koch HK. The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1978.
Komaroff AL. Acute dysuria in women. N Engl J Med. 1984;310:368–75.
Stamm WE, Counts GW, Running KR, Fihn S, Turck M, Holmes KK. Diagnosis of coliform infection in acutely dysuric women. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:463–8.
Stamm WE, Wagner KF, Amsel R, et al. Causes of the acute urethral syndrome in women. N Engl J Med. 1980;303:409–15.
Stamm WE. Measurement of pyuria and its relation to bacteriuria. Am J Med. 1983;75(suppl 1B):53–8.
Mabeck CE. Studies in urinary tract infections IV. Urinary leukocyte excretion in bacteriuria. Acta Med Scand. 1969;186:193–8.
Stansfield JM. The measurement and meaning of pyuria. Arch Dis Child. 1982;37:257–62.
Little PJ. A comparison of the urinary white cell concentration with the white cell excretion rate. Br J Urol. 1964;36:360–3.
Schumann GB, Schweitzer SC. Examination of urine. In: Henry JB, ed. Clinical diagnosis and management by laboratory methods, 18th ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1991;431.
Alwall N. Pyuria: deposit in high-power microscopic field WBC/hpf versus WBC/mL in counting chamber. Acta Med Scand. 1973;194:537–40.
Kusumi RK, Grover PJ, Kunin CM. Rapid detection of pyuria by leukocyte esterase activity. JAMA. 1981;245:1653–5.
Brumfitt W. Urinary cell counts and their value. J Clin Pathol. 1965;18:550–5.
Gadeholt H. Quantitative estimation of cells in urine. Acta Med Scand. 1968;183:369–74.
Sewell DL, Burt SP, Gabbert NJ, Bumgardner RV. Evaluation of the Chemstrip 9 as a screening test for urinalysis and urine culture in men. Am J Clin Pathol. 1985;83:740–3.
Wenk RE, Dutta D, Rudert J, Kim Y, Steinhagen C. Sediment microscopy, nitrituria, and leukocyte esterasuria as predictors of significant bacteriuria. J Clin Lab Automation. 1982;2:117–21.
Perry JL, Matthews JS, Weesner DE. Evaluation of leukocyte esterase activity as a rapid screening technique for bacteriuria. J Clin Microbiol. 1982;15:852–4.
Wenz B, Lampasso JA. Eliminating unnecessary urine microscopy. Am J Clin Pathol. 1989;92:78–81.
Murray PR, Smith TB, McKinney TC. Clinical evaluation of three urine screening tests. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25:467–70.
Jones C. MacPherson DW, Stevens DL. Inability of the chemstrip LN compared with quantitative urine culture to predict significant bacteriuria. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;23:160–2.
Crout FV, Tilton RC. Rapid screening of urine for significant bacteriuria by Gram stain, acridine organe stain, and the Autobac MTS system. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1984;2:179–86.
Jenkins RD, Fenn JP, Matsen JM. Review of urine microscopy for bacteriuria. JAMA. 1986;255:3397–403.
Winkel P, Statland BE, Jorgensen K. Urine microscopy, an ill-defined method examined by a multifactorial technique. Clin Chem. 1974;20:436–9.
Becker SM, Ramirez G, Pribor HC, Gillen AL. A quality control product for urinalysis. Am J Clin Pathol. 1973;59:185–91.
Schultz HJ, McCaffrey LA, Keys TF, Nobrega FT. Acute cystitis: a prospective study of laboratory tests and duration of therapy. Mayo Clin Proc. 1984;59:391–7.
Johnson JR, Stamm WE. Urinary tract infections in women: diagnosis and treatment. Ann Intern Med. 1989;111:906–17.
Komaroff AL. Urinalysis and urine culture in women with dysuria. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104:212–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received from the Division of Infectious Diseases and the Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and the Division of Public and Community Health Services, Denver Department of Health and Hospitals, Denver, Colorado.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blum, R.N., Wright, R.A. Detection of pyuria and bacteriuria in symptomatic ambulatory women. J Gen Intern Med 7, 140–144 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598002
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598002