Abstract
Objective:To determine whether a physician’s familiarity with the living will directly relates to an expressed willingness to discuss resuscitation issues with patients.
Design:Survey of selected primary care and medical subspecialist physicians most likely to care for seriously or terminally ill patients.
Setting:Private-practice clinicians practicing in an urban county.
Participants:Internists, family practitioners, cardiologists, oncologists, and neurologists in private practice.
Interventions:None.
Results:Almost all responding physicians (97.2%) knew of the living will, although few (13.5%) had executed one for themselves. Most were willing to keep a copy of their patients’ living wills with their office records. However, only a few physicians (20%) indicated they routinely discussed extraordinary care issues with their patients. In fact, most (70%) reported they rarely or never discussed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with their patients. With terminally ill patients, physician initiative was greater: 69% reported discussing resuscitation preferences. Comparable discussions with elderly patients were undertaken only if the physician believed they would be warranted by the clinical circumstances. When questioned about their own sentiments towards resuscitation, most physicians indicated they would not want CPR if they were terminally ill (86%) or mentally incompetent (93%). A similar number (92%) would refuse artificial feeding if permanently comatose.
Conclusions:Many physicians recognize the importance of living wills as an expression of patient treatment preferences. Nevertheless, discussion of patient preferences is unlikely because of physicians’ reluctance, except in limited circumstances, to initiate a dialogue about life-sustaining measures. Because patients also are often unwilling to begin such discussions, better methods of facilitating discussion of CPR and other extraordinary health care measures must be sought.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Deciding to forgo life-sustaining treatment: ethical, medical, and legal issues in treatment decisions. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983;231–47, 440–56.
Current opinions of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association—1989. Section 2.20–2.21.
Guidelines on the termination of life-sustaining treatment and the care of the dying. A report by the Hastings Center. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1987.
Emanuel LL, Emanuel EJ. The medical directive: a new comprehensive advance care document. JAMA. 1989;261:3288–93.
Nobel S, Ahronheim JC. The medical directive [letter]. JAMA. 1990;263:1069.
Orentlicher D. Cruzan v. Director of Missouri Department of Health: an ethical and legal perspective. JAMA. 1989;262:2928–30.
Frankl D, Oye RK, Bellamy PE. Attitudes of hospitalized patients toward life support: a survey of 200 medical inpatients. Am J Med. 1989;86:645–8.
Cruzan v. Harmon, 760 SW 2nd 408 (Mo 1988), affirmed sub nom; Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, et al. 111 L. Ed. 2d 224, 110 S. Ct. 2841 (1990).
In re Guardianship of Browning, 543 So. 2d 258 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).
Davidson KW, Hackler C, Caradine DR, McCord RS. Physicians’ attitudes on advance directives. JAMA. 1989;262:2415–9.
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, et al., supra, 111 L. Ed. 2d, supra at 224; 110 S. Ct., supra at 2863, Brennan J. Dissenting.
Right to a natural death. N.C. Gen Stat., Sec. 90–320 to 90–322.
Kouwenhoven WB, Jude JR, Knickerbocher GG. Closed-chest cardiac massage. JAMA. 1960;173:1064–7.
Blackhall LJ. Must we always use CPR? N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1281–4.
Moss AH. Informing the patient about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: when the risks outweigh the benefits. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:349–55.
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Life-sustaining technologies and the elderly, OTA-BA-306. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1987. Chapter 5;181–2.
Bjork RJ, Synder BD, Campion BC, et al. Medical complications of cardiopulmonary arrest. Arch Intern Med. 1982;142:500–3.
Schneiderman LJ, Arras JD. Counseling patients to counsel physicians on future care in the event of patient incompetence. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:693–8.
Zinberg JM. Advance care directives: do they provide direction [letter]? JAMA. 1990;263:1764.
Kinsella TD, Stocking CB. Failed communication about life-support therapy: silent physicians and mute patients. Am J Med. 1989;86:643–4.
Schiedermayer DL. The decision to forgo CPR in the elderly patient. JAMA. 1988;260:2096–7.
Murphy DJ. Do-not-resuscitate orders: time for reappraisal in long-term-care institutions. JAMA. 1988;260:2098–101.
Youngner SJ. Who defines futility? JAMA. 1988;260:2094–5.
Lantos JD, Singer PA, Walker RM, et al. The illusion of futility in clinical practice. Am J Med. 1989;87:81–4.
Schneiderman LJ, Jecker NS, Jonsen AR. Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:949–54.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by a grant from the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Health Services Foundation, Inc.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brunetti, L.L., Carperos, S.D. & Westlund, R.E. Physicians’ attitudes towards living wills and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. J Gen Intern Med 6, 323–329 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02597430
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02597430