Skip to main content
Log in

Modification of residents’ behavior by preceptor feedback of patient satisfaction

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors tested the effect of preceptor feedback to residents of patients’ ratings of perceived art and technical quality of care on residents’ subsequent performances. New ambulatory patients were asked to complete questionnaires measuring satisfaction with physician behavior during initial encounters. Sixty-eight residents were evaluated by 424 patients over a six-month period. Continuing residents with the lowest scores were assigned to a feedback or a non-feedback group. Residents in the feedback group were individually shown their mean scores on each item, as well as scores for all residents, and were then advised of physicians’ behaviors that could increase patient satisfaction. During a subsequent six-month survey of new patients, scores in the feedback group improved more than those in the non-feedback group in art of care, technical quality, and total patient satisfaction (p<0.001).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carroll JG, Monroe J. Teaching medical interviewing: a critique of educational research and practice. J Med Educ 1979;54:498–500

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ware JE Jr, Davies-Avery A, Stewart AL. The measurement and meaning of patient satisfaction. Health Med Care Serv Rev 1978;1:2

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adamson TE, Gullion DS. Physician—patient communication and medical malpractice. Mobius 1984;4:33–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Somers HM. The malpractice controversy and the quality of patient care. MMFQ/Health and Society 1977;95:193–231

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vaccarino JM. Malpractice: the problem in perspective. JAMA 1977;238:861–3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Linn LS, et al. A behavioral medicine course for postgraduate trainees in internal medicine. J Med Educ 1980;55:133–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gorlin R, Zucker HD. Physicians’ reactions to patients: a key to teaching humanistic medicine. N Engl J Med 1983;308:1059–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Young LE. The broadly-based internist as the backbone of medical practice. In: Ingelfinger FJ, Ebert RB, Finland M, Relman AS (eds). Controversies in internal medicine II. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  9. Griner PF (ed). Training of the general internist. Different approaches. Arch Intern Med 1977;137:1291–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Benson JA, Jr., Bollet AJ, Faber SJ, et al. Clinical competence in internal medicine. Ann Intern Med 1979;90:402–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Benson JA Jr. Blank LL, Frankel EP. et al. Evaluation of humanistic qualities in the internist. Ann Intern Med 1983;99:720–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ende J, Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA 1983;250:777–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Feletti GI, Carney SL. Evaluating patients’ satisfaction with medical students interviewing skills. Med Educ 1984;18:15–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thompson JA, Anderson JL. Patient preferences and bedside manner. Med Educ 1982;16:17–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Annon JS. The behavioral treatment of sexual problems. Vol. 1., brief therapy. Honolulu: Enabling Systems, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Linn LS, Cope DW, Leake B. The effect of gender and training of residents on satisfaction ratings by patients. J Med Educ 1984;59:964–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ware JE, Kane RL, Davies AR, Brook RH. The patient role in assessing medical care process. The Rand Corporation (in press)

  18. Ware JE, Davies AR. Behavioral consequences of patient dissatisfaction. Evaluation and Program Planning 1983;6:291–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Linn LS, Oye RK, Cope DW, DeMatteo MR. The use of nonphysician staff in evaluating physicians’ humanistic behavior. J Med Educ (submitted)

  20. Linn LS. Factors associated with patient evaluation of health care. Milbank Mem Fund Q 1975;4:531–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shortell SM. Continuity of medical care: conceptualization and measurement. Med Care 1976;14:377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Woolley FR, Kane RL, Hughes CC, Wright DP. The effects of doctor—patient communication on satisfaction and outcome of care. Soc Sci Med 1978;12:123–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wasson JH, Sauvigne AE, Mogielnicki RP, et al. Continuity of outpatient medical care in elderly men: a randomized trial. JAMA 1984;252:2413–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received from the Department of Medicine, UCLA Center for the Health Sciences, Los Angeles, California.

Supported by USPHS Grant #19157.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cope, D.W., Linn, L.S., Leake, B.D. et al. Modification of residents’ behavior by preceptor feedback of patient satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med 1, 394–398 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596425

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596425

Key words

Navigation