Skip to main content
Log in

Risk preference and laboratory test selection

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The risk preferences in situations of potential gain, and of potential loss, expressed by 67 physicians were correlated with the numbers of laboratory tests they selected after review of identical copies of two outpatient charts. Physicians who chose a 50/50 gamble of losing ten or no years of life expectancy over an equivalent certain loss of five years selected twice as many tests as those who chose the loss (p<0.025). Risk preferences may provide some insight into why some physicians order more laboratory tests than do others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eisenberg JM. Physician utilization. The state of research about physicians’ practice patterns. Med Care 1985;23:461–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schroeder SA, Kenders K, Cooper JK, Piemme TE. Use of laboratory tests and pharmaceuticals. Variation among physicians and effect of cost audit on subsequent use. JAMA 1973;225:969–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. White RE, Skipper BJ, Applegate WB, Bennett MD, Chilton LA. Ordering decision and clinic cost among resident physicians. West J Med 1984;141:117–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schroeder SA, Schliftman A, Piemme TE. Variation among physicians in use of laboratory tests: relation to quality of care. Med Care 1974;12:709–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Epstein AM, Begg CB, McNeil BJ. The effects of physicians’ training and personality on test ordering for ambulatory patients. Am J Public Health 1984;74:1271–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Daniels M, Schroeder SA. Variation among physicians in use of laboratory tests. II. Relation to clinical productivity and outcomes of care. Med Care 1977;15:482–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schroeder SA, Myers LP, McPhee SJ, et al. The failure of physician education as a cost containment strategy. Report of a prospective trial at a university hospital. JAMA 1984;252:225–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams SV, Eisenberg JM. A controlled trial to decrease the unnecessary use of diagnostic tests. J Gen Intern Med 1986;1:8–13

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eisenberg JM. An educational program to modify laboratory use by house staff. J Med Ed 1977;52:578–81

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nanji AA. Medical grand rounds and laboratory use. JAMA 1983;249:2890

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hogarth RM. Judgment and choice. The psychology of decision. Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A: Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tversky A, Kahneman D: The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981;211:453–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zar JH: Biostatistical analysis. Second edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eraker SA, Sox HC: Assessment of patients’ preferences for therapeutic outcomes. Med Decis Making 1981;1:29–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Feinstein AR: The “chagrin factor” and qualitative decision analysis. Arch Intern Med 1985;145:1257–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received from the Division of General Internal Medicine/Primary Care, Cook County Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nightingale, S.D. Risk preference and laboratory test selection. J Gen Intern Med 2, 25–28 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596246

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596246

Key words

Navigation