Skip to main content
Log in

Finite element analysis to optimize forming conditions for lower control arm

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Finite element simulations for the press forming of a lower arm are performed using the explicit dynamic finite element method (FEM) code PAM-STAMP. To optimize the press-forming conditions and secure a safe product without any failure, such as fractures and wrinkling, the FEM simulations are coupled with Taguchi’s orthogonal array experiment. Three design variables—the friction coefficient, plastic anisotropy parameter, and blank shape—are selected to be optimized. The numeric simulations reveal that the blank shape is the most important variable, and its modification is most effective in optimizing the press-forming conditions for a lower arm. In addition, the modified blank shape produces a high yield ratio for the in-come coil. The simulation results are confirmed with experimental ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y.T. Keum, E. Nakamachi, R.H. Wagoner, and J.K. Lee:Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng., 1990, vol. 30, pp. 1471–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R.H. Wagoner and D. Zhou: inNumerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes-NUMIFORM 92, edited by J.L. Chenot, R.D. Wood, and O.C. Zienkiewicz. Rotterdam, Netherlands, 1992, pp. 123–32.

  3. PAM_STAMP version 2.1, User’s Manual, Pam System International, ESI-GROUP Software Product Company, Rungis, CEDEX, 1996.

  4. M.S. Phadke and G. Taguchi:GLOBECOM’87 Meeting, IEEE Communications Society, Tokyo, Japan, 1987, pp. 1002–07.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.S. Phadke:Quality Engineering Using Robust Design, Prentice-Hall International Inc., 1989.

  6. ETA/FEMB Version 27, User’s Manual, Engineering Technology Associates, 1998.

  7. Y.S. Kim and K.S. Kim:J. Kor. Soc. Tech. Plasticity, 1994, vol. 3 (1), pp. 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y.S. Suh and R.H. Wagoner:J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 1996, vol. 5 (A), pp. 489–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Y.S. Kim, J.B. Nam, M.S. Chu, and Y.D. Kwon:Metal Trans. A, 2000, vol. 31 (A), pp. 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  10. K.C. Park and Y.S. Kim:J. Mater. Proc. Tech., 1995, vol. 51, pp. 64–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A.K. Ghosh, S.S. Hecker, and S.P. Keeler: inSheet Metal Forming and Testing, Workablility Testing Techniques, edited by G.E. Dieter, ASM, Metals Park, Ohio, 1984, pp. 125–95.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Y.S. Kim:Theory of Engineering Plasicity, Sigma Press, Seoul, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y.S. Kim and H.S. Son:J. Kor. Soc. Mech. Eng., 1999, vol. 23 (8), pp. 1380–87.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, Y., Yang, S., Sohn, H. et al. Finite element analysis to optimize forming conditions for lower control arm. Metall Mater Trans A 37, 2539–2547 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02586226

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02586226

Keywords

Navigation