Abstract
Experimental studies on the transmission and tolerance of vertical vibrations, caused by tractors, indicate that the tractor operator is exposed to low-frequency (0.5 to 11 Hz) and high-intensity vibrations, which are harmful to the body, causing disorders of the spine and supporting structures. The intensity of these “harmful” vibrations is reduced by providing a standard-type suspension to the tractor seat. In this paper, the coupled occupant-tractor system is modeled as a lumped parameter system. The composite model is analyzed, by computer simulation, for vertical vibrational responses, of the body parts, to (sinusoidal and transient) vertical vibrational inputs applied to the tractor wheels (as a simulation of the dynamic ground reaction caused by the motion of the tractor wheels over farm terrain and over a sudden obstruction). The parameters of the suspension system are selected such that the vertical vibrational responses of the body segments as well as chassis pitch vibrations are minimized in the above low-frequency range. The results show that, in comparison to the rigid seat, the standard-type seat suspension reduces the body segments' vertical and the chassis' pitch vibrational levels by 60 and 85%, respectively, thereby considerably improving the operator's riding comfort.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Coermann, R. R., Ziegunruecker, G. H., Wittwer, A. L., and Von Gierke, H. E. The passive dynamic mechanical properties of the human thorax-abdomen system and of the whole body system,Journal of AeroSpace Medicine 1960,31, 443–455.
Goldman, D. E., and Von Gierke, H. E.The effects of shock and vibration on man, Bethesda, Md.: Naval Medical Research Institute, 1960. Report No. 60-3.
Huang, B. K. Digital simulation analysis of biophysical systems.IEEEE Transactions of Biomedical Engineering 1972,BME-19, 128–139.
Magid, E. B., Coermann, R. R., Lowry, R. D., and Bosley, W. J.Physiological and mechanical response of the human to longitudinal whole body vibration as determined by subjective response. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, 1962. Report No. MRL TDR-62-66.
Magid, E. B., and Coermann, R. R., Human response to vibration. In E. Bennett, J. Degan, and J. Spiegel (Eds.),Human Factors in Technology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.
Mathews, J.Progress in the application of ergonomics to agricultural engineering. Paper Presented to Agricultural Eng. Symposium, Silsoe, 1967a.
Mathews, J. An analogue computer investigation of the potential improvement in tractor ride afforded by a flexible front axle.Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 1967b,12, 48–54.
Mathews, J.Ergonomics and tractor development. Paper presented to B.S.A.L.S./E.R.S. Meeting, Silsoe, 1972. pp. 125–143.
Mathews, J.The measurement of tractor ride comfort. Society of Automotive Engineers Meeting, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 1973. Paper No. 730795, pp. 1–16.
Muksian, R. A model for the response of seated humans to sinusoidal displacements of the seat.Journal of Biomechanics 1974,7, 209–215.
Pradko, F., Lee, R., and Kaluza, V.Theory of human vibration response. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1966. Paper No. 66-WA/BHF-15.
Pradko, F., Lee, R., and Greene, J. D.Human vibration response theory. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1967. Biomechanics Monograph 205–222.
Radke, A. O.Vehicle vibration ... man's environment. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Paper, 1957. 57-A, 54.
Roberts, V. L., Stech, E. L., and Terry, C. T.Review of mathematical models which describe human response to acceleration. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1966. Paper No. 66-WA/BHF-13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Palanichamy, M.S., Patil, M.K. & Ghista, D.N. Minimization of the vertical vibrations sustained by a tractor operator, by provision of a standard-type tractor seat suspension. Ann Biomed Eng 6, 138–153 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02584540
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02584540