Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanics of the otolith organ-dynamic response

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The otolith organs are the linear motion sensors of the mammalian system. As part of the vestibular system, these small organs are located in the inner ear. Mathematically modeled, they consist of an overdamped second-order system with elastic, viscous damping and mass elements. The governing equations of motion which describe the relative velocity of the mass with respect to the skull consist of a set of three coupled partial integral-differential equations. When these equations are nondimensionalized, they yield two nondimensional parameters which characterize the dynamic response of the system. These nondimensional equations are solved numerically for the relative displacement of the otolith mass for various values of the two nondimensional parameters. The solutions generated are for a step change in skull velocity. These solutions indicate that the end organ upper breakpoint frequency is at least one order of magnitude higher than previously measured experimental values determined by first-order neuron recordings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carlstrom, D. Crystallographic studies of the vertebrate otoliths.Biol. Bull. 125:441–463, 1963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Carlstrom, D., H. Engstrom and S. Hjorth. Electron microscope and X-ray diffraction studies of statoconia.Laryngoscope 63:1052–1057, 1953.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Igarashi, M. Dimensional study of the vestibular end organ apparatus. Second symposium on the role of vestibular organs in space exploration, NASA, 1966, pp. SP-115.

  4. Steer, R.W. The influence of angular and linear acceleration and thermal stimulation on the human semicircular canal. Sc.D. thesis, MIT, 1967.

  5. DeVries, H.L. Mechanics of the labyrinth otoliths.Acta Oto-Laryng. 38:262–273, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Young, L.R. and J.L. Miery. A revised dynamic otolithic model.Aerospace Med. 39:606–608, 1968.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Grant, J.W., W.A. Best and R. LoNigro. Governing equations of motion for the otolith organs and their response to a step change in velocity of the skull.J. Biomech. Engng 106:302–308, 1984.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Beckeret al. Heat diffusion with time dependent convective boundary conditions.Numer. Meth. Engng 19:1871–1880, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Young, L.R.et al. Occular torsion on earth and in weightlessness.Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 374:80–91, 1981.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mayne, R. The constants of the semicircular canal differential equation. Goodyear Aerospace Corp., Report GERA-1083, 1965.

  11. Wilson, V.J. and G.M. Jones.Mammalian Vestibular Physiology. New York: Plenum, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Money, K.E.et al. Physical properties of fluids and structures of vestibular apparatus of the pigeon.Am. J. Physiol. 220:140, 1971.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fernandez, C. and J.M. Goldberg. Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. III. response dynamics.J. Neurophysiol. 39:996, 1976.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Oman, C.M. and L.R. Young. The physiological range of pressure difference and cupular deflection in the human semicircular canal.Acta Oto-Laryng. 74:324, 1972.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. von Rosenberg, Dale U.Methods for the Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations. New York: Elsevier, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grant, J.W., Best, W.A. Mechanics of the otolith organ-dynamic response. Ann Biomed Eng 14, 241–256 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02584273

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02584273

Keywords

Navigation