Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Financial interests of authors in scientific journals: A pilot study of 14 publications

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Disclosure of financial interests in scientific research is the centerpiece of the new conflict of interest regulations issued by the U.S. Public Health Service and the National Science Foundation that became effective October 1, 1995. Several scientific journals have also established financial disclosure requirements for contributors.

This paper measures the frequency of selected financial interests held among authors of certain types of scientific publications and assesses disclosure practices of authors. We examined 1105 university authors (first and last cited) from Massachusetts institutions whose 789 articles, published in 1992, appeared in 14 scientific and medical journals.

Authors are said to “possess a financial interest” if they are listed as inventors in a patent or patent application closely related to their published work; serve on a scientific advisory board of a biotechnology company; or are officers, directors, or major shareholders (beneficial owner of 10% or more of stock issued) in a firm that has commercial interests related to their research. Applying the criteria to the reference population of journals and Massachusetts academic authors, we measured the following frequencies for lead authors: .20 for serving on a scientific advisory board; .07 for being an officer, director, or major shareholder in a biotechnology firm; and .22 for being listed as an inventor in a related patent or patent application. The joint frequency of articles in the journals reviewed with a lead author that meets one of the three conditions is .34. Implications of these results for the new conflict of interest guidelines and disclosure policies are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Emerson, C.L. (1952) The contributions of industry to scientific education. In: Bounell, A.T., Christman, R.C., eds;Industrial Science: Present and Future. AAAS, Washington D.C., pp. 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M., Louis, K.S., Stoto, M.A., and Wise, D. (1986) University-industry research relationships in biotechnology: implications for the university.Science 232: 1361–1366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M., Louis, K.S. and Wise, D. (1986) Industrial support of university research in biotechnology.Science 231: 242–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Krimsky, S. (1991)Biotechnics and Society: The Rise of Industrial Genetics. Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher, L.M. (1994) Profits and ethics collide in a study of genetic coding.New York Times, 30 January, sect. 1, pp. 1, 16.

  6. Benowitz, S. (1995) The road to university technology licensing is littered with patents that languish.The Scientist 18 September, pp. 1, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blumenthal, D. (1994) Growing pains for new academic/industry relationships.Health Aff. 13, issue 3, 176–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Spier, R. (1995) Ethical aspects of the university-industry interface.Science and Engineering Ethics 1: 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Djerassi, C. (1993) Managing competing interests: chastity vs. promiscuity. In:Ethics, Values, and The Promise of Science: Forum Proceedings. Sigma Xi The Scientific Research Society, Research Triangle Park, NC, pp. 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Association of American Medical Colleges, Ad Hoc Committee on Misconduct and Conflict of Interest in Research. (1990) Guidelines for dealing with faculty conflicts of commitment and conflicts of interest in research.Academic Medicine 65: 488–496.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Relman, A.S. (1984) Dealing with conflict of interest.New England Journal of Medicine 310, 1182–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kenney, M. (1986)Biotechnology: The University-Industrial Complex. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Southgate, M.T. (1987) Conflict of interest and the peer review process [editorial].JAMA 258, 1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson, R.S. (1989) Conflict of interest issue heats up.FASEB J. 3: 2005–2006.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Krimsky, S. and Baltimore, D. (1980) The ties that bind or benefit.Nature 283: 130–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lepkowski, W. (1984) University/industry research ties still viewed with concern.Chem. & Eng. News 65:7–11 (June 25).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zinder, N.D. and Winn, J. (1984) A partial summary of university-industry relationships in the United States.Recomb. DNA Tech. Bull. 7:8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Culliton, B. (1981) Biomedical research enters the marketplace.N. Engl. J. Med. 20:1195–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Porter, R.J. and Malone, T.E., eds. (1992)Biomedical Research: Collaboration and Conflict of Interest. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Koshland, D.E. (1990) Conflict of interest policy [editorial].Science 249: 109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Koshland, D.E. (1992) Conflicts of interest policy [editorial].Science 257: 595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Koshland, D.E. (1993) Simplicity and complexity in conflict of interest [editorial].Science 261: 11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Friedman, P. J. (1991) Scientific research conflict of interest: policies and tests.FASEB J. 5: 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Maddox, J. (1992) Conflict of interest declared.Nature 360: 205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Parmley, W.W. (1992) Conflict of interest: an issue for authors and reviewers [editorial].J. Amer. Coll. Cardiol. 20: 1017–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kassirer, J.P. and Angell, M. (1993) Financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research.N. Engl. J. Med. 329: 570–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith, R. (1994) Conflict of interest and theBMJ.Br. Med. J. 308: 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  28. U.S. Congress, Committee on Government Operations, Subcommittee on Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations. (1989)Federal Response to Misconduct in Science: Are Conflicts of Interest Hazardous to our Health?, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  29. U.S. Congress. Committee on Government Operations, Subcommittee on Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations. (1990)Are Scientific Misconduct and Conflict of Interest Hazardous to our Health?, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  30. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. (1995) Objectivity in Research.Federal Register 60 (132):35810–35819 (July 11), on p. 35812.

    Google Scholar 

  31. National Science Foundation. (1995) Investigator Financial Disclosure Policy.Federal Register 60 (132):35820–35823 (July 11).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lawrence, D.J. (1990) Questions of authorship and financial conflicts of interest [editorial].J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther. 13: 61–62.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rennie, D., Flanagin, A. and Glass, R.M. (1991) Conflicts of interest in the publication of science [editorial].JAMA 266: 266–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Parish, L.C., Witkowski, J.A. and Millikan, L.E. (1991) Conflict of interest and scientific publications.Int. J. Dermatol. 30: 250–251.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kohn, A. and Putterman, C. (1993) Problems and conflicts in peer review [review].Int. J. Impot. Res. 5: 133–137.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Witt, M.D. and Gostin, L.O. (1994) Conflict of interest dilemmas in biomedical research.JAMA 271: 547–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. National Science Foundation. (1994) Investigator Financial Disclosure Policy.Federal Register 59 (123):33308–33312 (June 28).

    Google Scholar 

  38. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. (1994) Financial Disclosure by Clinical Investigators.Federal Register 59(183):48708–48719 (September 22).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lundberg, G.D. and Flanagin, A. (1989) New requirements for authors: signed statements of authorship responsibility and financial disclosure [editorial].JAMA 262: 2003–2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. International Committee of Medical Journal Writers. (1993) Conflict of interest.Lancet 341: 742–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Krimsky, S., Ennis, J., and Weissman, R. (1991) Academic corporate ties in biotechnology: a quantitative study.Sci. Tech. Human Values 16(3): 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Genetic Engineering News. (1994)The Genetic Engineering News Guide to Biotechnology Companies. Mary Ann Liebert, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Institute for Scientific Information. (1993)1992 Science Citation Index Journal Citation Reports: A Bibliometric Analysis of Science Journals in the ISI Database. Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Berks, A. H. (1994) Patent information in biotechnology.Trends Biotechnol. 12: 352–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Relman, A.S. (1990) New ‘information for authors’-and readers [editorial].N. Engl. J. Med. 323: 56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Information for authors. (1992)N. Engl. J. Med. 327: 721.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Information for contributors. (1995)Science 257: 601.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Information for contributors. (1996)Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93: i.

  49. Rothman, K.J. (1993). Conflict of interest: the New McCarthyism in science.JAMA 269: 2782–2784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Djerassi, C. (1993) Basic research: the gray zone [policy forum].Science 261, 972–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urban and Environmental Policy, Tufts University, 02155, Medford, MA, USA

    Sheldon Krimsky Ph.D. (Professor)

  2. Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles

    L. S. Rothenberg

  3. Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts

    P. Stott

  4. Office of Corporate Liaison and Technology Transfer, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey

    G. Kyle

Authors
  1. Sheldon Krimsky Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. S. Rothenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Stott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Kyle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krimsky, S., Rothenberg, L.S., Stott, P. et al. Financial interests of authors in scientific journals: A pilot study of 14 publications. Sci Eng Ethics 2, 395–410 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02583927

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02583927

Keywords

Search

Navigation