Skip to main content
Log in

Studies on replacement of phosphate builders in laundry detergents using radiolabeled soils

  • Technical
  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society

Abstract

The fabric detergency performance of systems containing different types of surfactants and several builders of reduced phosphate content has been compared using a radiolabeled sebum-clay soil. Use of this soil allows quantitative measurement of both sebum and clay removal from soiled swatches, generally cotton and permanent press Dacron-cotton. One study compared alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS), alcohol sulfate (AS), alcohol ethoxysulfate (AEOS) and alcohol ethoxylate (AEO) as surfactants in formulations containing from 0–45% sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP). Especially under hard water conditions, the AEO and AEOS considerably out-perform the LAS and AS at equal use concentrations and are less sensitive to phosphate reduction. Tests with cotton swatches soiled with five different carbon black-oil mixtures generally rank the surfactants in the same order, although individual responses of the cloths vary considerably. A further study compares the effect of replacing STPP with sodium nitrilotriacetate (NTA) in formulations containing varying amounts of AEO or LAS. Detergency improves significantly with increasing surfactant concentration, particularly with AEO, and declines as builder strength is reduced. AEO exceeds LAS considerably in performance under the test conditions even at relatively high concentrations of LAS. Another study compares the performance of AEO and LAS at equal concentrations in formulations containing a variety of builders. AEO is generally superior to LAS in removing both sebum and clay soils and is less sensitive to builders and water hardness. The builders generally rank in this order: STPP > NTA = citrate > carbonate > sulfate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lamberti, V., Canada Patent 853,647, Oct. 13, 1970.

  2. Weil, I., British Patent 1,151,392, Aug. 7, 1969.

  3. Diehl, F.L., U.S. Patent 3,308,067, March 7, 1967.

  4. Wilham, C.A., T.A. McGuire, A.M. Mark and C.L. Mehltretter, JAOCS 47:522 (1970).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Langguth, R.P., Detergents and Specialties 1970(11):28.

  6. Pitts, P.M., Deterg. Age 5(2):20 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bistline, R.G., Jr., and A.J. Stirton, JAOCS 48:74 (1971).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Katstra, R.D., Soap Chem. Spec. 1971(2):36.

  9. Gordon, B.E., and W.T. Shebs, JAOCS 46:537 (1969).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Illman, J.C., G.M. Hartwig and J.W. Roddewig, Ibid. 46:70 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shebs, W.T., and B.E. Gordon, Ibid. 45:377 (1968).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Illman, J.C., B.M. Finger, W.T. Shebs and T.B. Albin, Ibid. 47:379 (1970).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Illman, J.C., Albin, T.B. & Stupel, H. Studies on replacement of phosphate builders in laundry detergents using radiolabeled soils. J Am Oil Chem Soc 49, 217–221 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02582581

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02582581

Keywords

Navigation