Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic regulation of cercosporin production inCercospora kikuchii

  • Symposium
  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society

Abstract

The large and diverseCercospora genus of plant pathogenic fungi includes many species that are causal agents of economically relevant leaf, stem, and seed blights of numerous crop plants. Several of these pathogens produce the red, photoactivated, phytotoxic polyketide toxin cercosporin. This mycotoxin is a crucial pathogenicity factor in the development of leaf and pod blights by the seed-borne soybean fungal pathogenCercospora kikuchii. Although certain cultivars may be less susceptible to the leaf- and pod-infection phases of the fungus, there are no soybean cultivars with resistance to cercosporin. A newly isolated gene fromC. kikuchil, known as LE6, is essential for cercosporin production and pathogenicity. Therefore, genetic manipulation of this gene may affect resistance to cercosporin. Transcription of LE6 is regulated by light. The expression of cercosporin also may be inhibited by certain growth media and other natural products. Modification of cultivar screens that target LE6 may greatly enhance the possibility of finding native resistance to this soybean pathogen. Soybean germplasm that produces strong LE6 downregulating or inhibiting compounds may enhance pathogen resistance. Thus knowledge of the genetic and physiological regulation of cercosporin should provide new technological strategies for biocontrol of mycotoxins and the development of soybean breeding lines that exhibit durable resistance toC. kikuchii.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Daub, M.E., and M. Ehrenshaft,Physiol. Plant. 89:227 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jenns, A.E., M.E. Daub, and R.G. Upchurch,Phytopathology 79:213 (1989).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Okubo, A., S. Yamazaki, and K. Fuwa,Agr. Biol. Chem. 39:1173 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ehrenshaft, M., and R.G. Upchurch,Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:2671 (1991).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Callahan, T.M., M. Ehrenshaft, and R.G. Upchurch,Phytopathology 83:1422 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Upchurch, R.G., D.C. Walker, J.A. Rollins, M. Ehrenshaft, and M.E. Daub,Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:2940 (1991).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Upchurch, R.G., M. Ehrenshaft, D.C. Walker, and L.A. Sanders, Ibid.:2935 (1991).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Callahan, T.M., and R.G. Upchurch, in section H-24,Abstr. Am. Soc. Microbiol., 1994, p. 204.

  9. Meade, M.J., and R.G. Upchurch, in section O-24,Ibid., 1994, p. 358.

  10. Orth, C.E.,Plant Dis. 78:661 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pathan, M.A., J.B. Sinclair, and R.D. McClary, Ibid.:720 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rollins, J.A., M. Ehrenshaft, and R.G. Upchurch,Can. J. Microbiol. 39:118 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ehrenshaft, M., and R.G. Upchurch,Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 43:95 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Upchurch, R.G. Genetic regulation of cercosporin production inCercospora kikuchii . J Am Oil Chem Soc 72, 1435–1438 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02577834

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02577834

Key words

Navigation