Skip to main content
Log in

The patients perspective of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied the effect of a single analgesic regime for outpatient lithotripsy on the patient's perception of pain and the disruption of their normal activities by sending a postal questionnaire to 200 patients. Results showed that 15% of patients received insufficient analgesia during ESWL, 25% considered treatment painful, 6.8% had side effects from analgesia, 18% had delayed return to their normal activities and 33% contacted their doctor within a week of lithotripsy with problems related to it. This study shows that analgesic requirements of patients treated with modern lithotriptors are underestimated. This can be avoided by tailoring analgesia to individual needs and better patient communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chaussy, C., Brenden, W., Schmildt, E.: Extracorporeal induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves.Lancet, 3, 1265 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bierkens, A., Hendrkx, A., DeKort, V. et al.: Efficacy of second generator lithotriptors: A multicenter comparative study of 2, 206 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatments with the Siemens Lithostar, Dornier HM4, Wolf Piezolith 2300, Direx Tripter X-1 and Breakstone lithotriptors.J. Urol., 148, 1052 (1992).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eisenberger, F., Fuch, G. J.: World experience with shock wave lithotripsy and endoscopy, an ideal combination for treatment of kidney stones.World J. Urol., 3, 41 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wickham, J., Webb, D., Pyne, S. et al.: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: The first 50 patients treated in Britain.Br. Med. J., 290, 1188 (1985).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cook, R., Newhurst, R., Thomas, D.: Does combined epidural Lignocain and Fentanyl provide better anaesthesia for ESWL than Lignocain alone.Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 19 (3), 357 (1991).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Loening, S., Kronolowski, E., Willoughby, B.: Use of local anaesthesia for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.J. Urol., 137, 626 (1987).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Allman, D., Richin, D., Ruttenburg, M., et al.: Analgesia in anaesthesia free extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: A standardized protocol.J. Urol., 146, 178 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Friedman, B., Jedeikin, R., Olsfanger, D. et al.: The opium sparing effect of Diclofinac Sodium in outpatient extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.J. Clin. Anaesthetics, 5, (2), 141 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dickinson, A., Cranston, D., Dohle, D. et al.: The mobile lithotriptor, an answer for the smaller centre.Br. J. Urol., 71, 396 (1993).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dawson, C., Vale, J., Corry, D. et al.P Choosing the correct pain relief for extracorporeal lithotripsy.Br. J. Urol., 302 (1994).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahmood, N., Turner, W., Rowgaski, K. et al. The patients perspective of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. International Urology and Nephrology 30, 671–675 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02564851

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02564851

Keywords

Navigation