Skip to main content
Log in

Surgical treatment and late results in 1226 cases of colorectal cancer

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

One thousand two hundred twenty-six cases of colorectal cancer were treated surgically between 1956 and 1978. Seven hundred ninety-eight cases (65.08 per cent) were rectal, 74.3 per cent of which were located extraperitoneally. Dukes' C2 cases and cases with distant metastasis constituted 39.15 per cent, and Dukes' A cases, 9.22 per cent. Resectability rate was 75.1 per cent (77.6 per cent for rectal cancer). Two hundred and four cases (32.96 per cent) of rectal excision were restorative resections. Of the combined excisions for extraperitoneal lesions in females, 84.8 per cent were posterior pelvic exenterations. The overall operative mortality rate was 2.93 per cent. The mortality rate for 921 cases of resection was 1.73 per cent, for rectal resection, 0.8 per cent, and for curative rectal resection, 0.63 per cent. The follow-up rate was 94.13 per cent. The five-and ten-year survival rates for rectal resection were 53.08 ±2.29 per cent and 47.65±2.44 per cent; for curative rectal resection, 66.91±2.54 per cent and 60.27±3.03 per cent; and for Dukes' A cases, 98.05±1.35 per cent and 96.39±2.13 per cent. The five- and ten-year survival rates for colonic resection were 59.79±2.04 per cent and 52.18 ±3.49 per cent; for curative colonic resection, 72.79±3.39 per cent and 62.06±4.17 per cent; and for Dukes' A cases, both 100 per cent. Besides the extent of spread and degree of malignancy of a lesion, the local immunologic reaction of the host is also important in prognosis. The more lymphocytic infiltration in and around the cancer, the more follicular hyperplasia and sinus histiocytosis in regional lymph nodes, the better is the prognosis. The problem of anal preservation in radical resection of rectal cancer and the problem of improvement of results in the treatment of extraperitoneal rectal cancer are discussed in detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhou X. Discussion on the Dukes' staging of colorectal cancer. Chin J Oncol (in press).

  2. Chen Z, Zhou X. Discussion on the lymphocytic reaction in and around rectal adenocarcinoma and its effect on prognosis. Chin Med J 1981;61:136.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dukes CE, Bussey HJ. The spread of rectal cancer and its effect on prognosis. Br J Cancer 1958;12:309–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Grinnell RS. Distal intramural spread of carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1954;99:421–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Grinnell RS. Lymphatic block with atypical and retrograde lymphatic metastasis and spread in carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Ann Surg 1966;163:272–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Quer EA, Dahlin DC, Mayo CW. Retrograde intramural spread of carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid: a microscopic study. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1953;96:24–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goligher JC, Dukes CE, Bussey HJ. Local recurrences after sphincter-saving excisions for carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid. Br J Surg 1951;39:199–211.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goligher JC. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. 3rd ed. London: Bailliere Tindall, 1975;663:646.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou X. Discussion on anterior resection in the treatment of cancer of the upper rectum and rectosigmoid. Chin J. Surg 1965;13:212.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Best RR, Blair JB. Sphincter preserving operations for rectal carcinoma as related to the anatomy of the lymphatics. Ann Surg 1949;130:538–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Black BM, Botham RJ. Combined abdominoendorectal resection for lesions of the mid and upper parts of the rectum. Arch Surg 1958;76:688–96.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Parks AG. In: Todd I, ed. Operative surgery. 3rd ed. London: Butterworth, 1977:156.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou X. Modified Bacon operation in the treatment of cancer of the mid-rectum. Chin J Surg 1965;13:212.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fenoglio CM, Kaye GI, Lane N. Distribution of human colonic lymphatics in normal hyperplastic, and adenomatous tissue: its relationship to metastasis from small carcinomas in pedunculated adenomas, with two case reports. Gastroenterology 1973; 64:51–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Morson BC, Bussey HJ, Samoorian S. Policy of local excision for early cancer of the colorectum. Gut 1977;18:1045–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou X. Posterior pelvic exenteration in the treatment of extraperitoneal rectal cancer in female patients. Chin J Surg 1965;13:884.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Deddish MR. Discussion. Proc R Soc Med 1950;43:1075–81.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sauer I, Bacon HE. A new approach for excision of carcinoma of the lower portion of the rectum and anal canal. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1952;95:229–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stearns MW Jr, Deddish MR. Five-year results of abdominopelvic lymph node dissection for carcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1959;2:169–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Reprints will not be available.

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, XG., Yu, BM. & Shen, YX. Surgical treatment and late results in 1226 cases of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 26, 250–256 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02562491

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02562491

Key words

Navigation