Abstract
Twenty-one patients with high transsphincteric fistulas treated by the seton technique were re-examined after two to 14 years. None had recurrent fistulas, but 13 (62 percent) had some degree of continence disturbances. All patients with anal deformities had continence disorders.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Goligher JC. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. 5th ed. London: Ballière Tindall, 1984.
Bennett, RC. A review of the results of orthodox treatment for anal fistulae. Proc R Soc Med 1962;55:756–7.
Belliveau P, Thomson JP, Parks AG. Fistula-in-ano: a manometric study. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:152–4.
Pedersen, IK, Christiansen J. The effect of glucagon and glucagon 1–21 on anal sphincter function. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:235–7.
Lilius HG. Fistula-in-ano: an investigation of human foetal anal ducts and intramuscular glands and a clinical study of 150 patients. Acta Chir Scand 1968;(suppl)383:1–88.
Vasilevsky CA, Gordon PH. Results of treatment of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;28:225–31.
Culp, CE. Use of Penrose drains to treat certain anal fistulas: a primary operative seton. Mayo Clin Proc 1984;59:613–7.
Ramanujam PS, Prasad ML, Abcarian H. The role of seton in fistulotomy of the anus. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1983;157:419–22.
Marks CG, Ritchie JK. Anal fistulas in St Mark's Hospital. Br J Surg 1977;64:84–91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Christensen, A., Nilas, L. & Christiansen, J. Treatment of transsphincteric anal fistulas by the seton technique. Dis Colon Rectum 29, 454–455 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02561583
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02561583