Skip to main content
Log in

Management as a technical practice: Professionalization or responsibilization?

  • Papers
  • Published:
Systems practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper attempts to make sense of the apparent paradox of the successful representation of management as a technical practice coexisting with a lack of success in management sustaining a project of professionalization. The success of the former has, for many occupations, been the key to the latter, especially when allied with university licensing. The main issues and debates relating to management as a technical practice, management as a profession, and the role of the management academy are outlined. This leads to an alternative interpretation of their relation, in which the representation of management as a technical practice is envisaged not as a failed professionalization of management but rather as a successful responsibilization of managers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, A. (1988).The System of Professions An Essay on the Division of Expert Labour, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. (1987).Organization Theory and Technocratic Consciousness: Rationality, Ideology and the Quality of Work, de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., and Willmott, H. (eds.) (1992).Critical Management Studies, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S., and Kunda, G. (1992). Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse.Admin. Sci. Q. 37, 363–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendix, R. (1956).Work and Authority in Industry. Ideologies of Management in the Course of Industrialization, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. (1976).The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bledstein, B. (1976).The Culture of Professionalism. The Middle Class and the Development of Higher Education in America, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boje, D., and Dennehy, R. (1993).Managing in the Postmodern World. America's Revolution Against Exploitation, Kendall Hunt, Dubuque, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., and Gintis, H. (1976).Schooling in Capitalist America, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandeis, L. D. (1914).Business—A Profession, Small, Maynard, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, J. (1945).The Managerial Revolution, Penguin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, A. (1967) The Hawthorne studies: A radical criticism.Am. Sociol. Rev. 32, 403–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, S. (1951).Executive Behaviour, Almqvist & Wiksell International, Stockholm, (1991 reprint).

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, H. (1915).The Axioms of Business, Efficiency Exchange, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. (1965).The Railroads: The Nation's First Big Business, Sources and Readings, Harcourt Brace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chia, R., and Morgan, S. (1996). Educating the Philosopher-manager: De-signing the times.Manage. Learn,27, 37–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. (1969).British Management Thought. A Critical Analysis, Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., Fores, M., Glover, I., and Lawrence, P. (1983). A price to pay? Professionalism and work organization in Britain and West Germany.Sociology 17, 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. (1995).Managing Consultants. Consultancy as the Management of Impressions, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S., Boreham, P., and Dow, G. (1986).Class, Politics and the Economy, Routledge Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collin, A. (1996). The MBA: The potential for students to find their voice in Babel. In French, R., and Grey, C. (eds.),Rethinking Management Education, Sage, London, pp. 132–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, S. (1992).Democracy in an Age of Corporate Colonization, SUNY Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • du Gay, P. (1995).Consumption and Identity at Work, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engwall, L. (1992).Mercury Meets Minerva. Business Administration in Academia: The Swedish Case, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enteman, W. (1993).Managerialism. The Emergence of a New Ideology, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1970).The Order of Things, Tavistock, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979).Discipline and Punish, Penquin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, R., and Grey, C. (eds.) (1996).Rethinking Management Education, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furusten, S. (1995).The Managerial Discourse—A Study of the Creation and Diffusion of Popular Management Knowledge, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Business Studies, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Game, A. (1990).Undoing Sociology, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garsten, C., and Grey, C. (1997). How to become oneself: Discourses of subjectivity in postbureaucratic organizations.Organization 4, 211–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1974).Positivism and Sociology, Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, C. (1994). Career as project of the self and labour process discipline.Sociology 28, 427–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grey, C. (1996a). Critique and renewal in management education.Manage. Learn. 27, 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, C. (1996b). Towards a critique of managerialism. The contribution of Simone Weil.J. Manage. Stud. 33, 591–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, C., and French, R. (1996). Rethinking management education: An introduction. In French, R., and Grey, C. (eds.),Rethinking Management Education, Sage, London, pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, C., and Mitev, N. (1995). Management education: A polemic.Manage. Learn. 26, 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, C., Knights, D., and Willmott, H. (1996). Is a critical pedagogy of management possible? In French, R., and Grey, C. (eds.),Rethinking Management Education, Sage, London, pp. 94–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1971).Towards a Rational Society, Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987).The Theory of Communicative Action (Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason), Vol. 2, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckscher, C. (1995).White Collar Blues, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckscher, C., and Donnellon, A. (eds.) (1994).The Post-Bureaucratic Organization. New Perspectives on Organizational Change, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, R. (1988). Financial Accounting: In communicating reality, we construct reality.Account. Organiz. Soc. 13, 251–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, N. and Carter, P. (1995). The “fact” of management.Scand. J. Manage. 11, 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, H. (1973).The Bureaucratization of the World, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, R. (1996).Manufacturing the Employee. Management Knowledge from the 19th to 21 st Centuries, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M. (1977).Men and Women of the Corporation, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. (1994). Plenary address, British Academy of Management Conference, Lancaster University, Sept.

  • Kimball, B. (1992).The ‘True Professional Ideal’ in America. A History, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D. (1992). Changing spaces: The disruptive impact of a new epistemological location for the study of management.Acad. Manage. Rev. 17, 514–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (1982). What effective general managers really do.Harvard Bus. Rev. 60, 156–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R., and Tyler, T. (eds.) (1996).Trust in Organizations, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962).The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, M. (1977).The Rise of Professionalism. A Sociological Analysis, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt, H. (1991). Socializing our MBAs: Total immersion? Managed cultures? Brainwashing?Calif. Manage. Rev. 33, 127–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littler, C., (1982).The Development of the Labour Process in Capitalist Societies, Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, R. (1984).The End of Practical Man, JAI Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, R. (1989).Management and Higher Education Since 1940, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1981).After Virtue, Duckworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mant, A. (1977).The Rise and Fall of the British Manager, Macmillan London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1964).One Dimensional Man, Routledge Kegan Paul, London (1986 reprint).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1973).The Nature of Managerial Work, Harper & Row, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I., and Churchmann, C. (1992). Debate,Harvard Bus. Rev. 70, 134–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyland, C. (1988). Scientific management and planning.Capital Class 33, 55–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, S. (1968).The Genesis of Modern Management, Penguin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raelin, J., and Schermerhorn, J. (1994). A new paradigm for advanced management education—How knowlege merges with experience.Manage. Learn. 25, 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. (1989).The Sociology of Management, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M., and Anthony, P. (1992). Professionalizing management and managing professionalization: British management in the 1980s.J. Manage. Stud. 29, 591–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (1993).The McDonaldization of Society, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, B. (1939).La Bureaucratization du Monde, Champ Libre, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1989).Governing the Soul, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueschemeyer, D. (1986).Power and the Division of Labour, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarfatti Larson, M. (1984), The Production of Expertise and the Constitution of Expert Power. In Haskell, T. L. (ed.),The Authority of Experts, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 28–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990).The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikka, P., and Willmott, H. (1995). The Power of “Independence”: Defending and Extending the Jurisdiction of Accounting in the United Kingdom.Accounting, Organizations and Society 20, 547–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A. (1995). Sex and the MBA.Organization 2, 295–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1904).The Wealth of Nations. Methuen, London (Original 1776).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R. (1967).Managers and their Jobs. Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J., and McGivern, J. (1996). Parody, Process and Practice: Perspectives for Management Education.Management Learning,27, 21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townley, B. (1994).Reframing Human Resource Management. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1918).The Higher Learning in America: A Memorandum on the Conduct of Universities by Business Men. Huebsch, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T. (1994).In Search Of Management. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T. (1995). Management Fads: Their Role in Managers' Lives.International Journal of Human Resource Management,5, 889–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T. (1996). Motivation. That's Maslow isn't it?Management Learning 27, 447–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1968).Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. Bedminster Press, New York (Original 1922).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil S. (1988) Oppression and Liberty. Routledge Kegan Paul, London (Original 1933).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (1984a)The Intellectual and Social Organisation of the Sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (1984b). The Fragmented State of Management Studies: Reasons and Consequences.Journal of Management Studies 21, 331–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (1995). Academic Knowledge and Work Jurisdiction in Management.Organization Studies 16, 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R., Thomas, A. and Marceau, J. (1981).Masters of Business. The Making of a New Elite? Tavistock, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. H. (1956).The Organization Man, Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, H. (1964). The professionalization of everyone?.Am. J. Sociol. 70, 137–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H. (1984) Images and ideals of managerial work: A critical examination of conceptual and empirical accounts.J. Manage. Stud. 21, 349–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, P. (1958).The Idea of a Social Science, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wren, D. (1994).The Evolution of Management Thought John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grey, C. Management as a technical practice: Professionalization or responsibilization?. Systems Practice 10, 703–725 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557921

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557921

Key words

Navigation