Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to determine relative taste preferences for five food-associated sugars inAteles geoffroyi. Using two-solution choice tests of brief duration (5 min) four adult spider monkeys were given the choice between all binary combinations of sucrose, fructose, glucose, lactose, and maltose presented in equimolar concentrations of 20, 50, 100, and 200 mM respectively. Preferences for individual sugars were stable across the concentrations tested and indicate an order of relative effectiveness (sucrose>fructose>glucose≥lactose≥maltose) which is similar to results obtained with the same method in the squirrel monkey and to findings on relative sweetness in man. These results support the assumption that the order of relative effectiveness of the sugars under investigation found in the present study may represent a general pattern of preference in frugivorous and perhaps all primates.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Beauchamp, G. K.;Maller, O.;Rogers, J. G. 1977. Flavor preferences in cats (Felis catus andPanthera sp.).J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 91: 1118–1127.
Breslin, P. A. S.;Beauchamp, G. K.;Pugh, E. N. 1996. Monogeusia for fructose, glucose, sucrose, and maltose.Percept. Psychophys., 58: 327–341.
Breslin, P. A. S.;Kemp, S.;Beauchamp, G. K. 1994. Single sweetness signal.Nature, 369: 447–448.
Cameron, A. 1947.The Taste Sense and the Relative Sweetness of Sugars and Other Sweet Substances. Rep No. 9, Sugar Research Foundation, New York.
Chapman, C. 1987. Flexibility in the diets of three species of Costa Rican primates.Folia Primatol., 49: 90–105.
Feigin, M. B.;Sclafani, A.;Sunday, S. R. 1987. Species differences in polysaccharide and sugar taste preferences.Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 11: 231–240.
Ferrell, F. 1984. Preference for sugars and nonnutritive sweeteners in young beagles.Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 8: 199–203.
Glaser, D. 1979. Gustatory preference behaviour in primates. In:Preference Behavior and Chemoreception,Kroeze,J. H. A. (ed.), IRL Press, London, pp. 51–61.
Glaser, D. 1986. Geschmacksforschung bei primaten.Vjschr. Naturforsch. Ges. Zurich, 131: 92–110.
Glaser, D. 1993. The effects of sweeteners in primates. In:Sweet-taste Chemoreception,Mathlouti,M.;Kanters,J. A.;Birch,G. G. (eds.), Elsevier, London, pp. 353–363.
Harriman, A. E. 1970. Preferences by Mongolian gerbils for solutions of sugars, acids, and salts in Richter-type drinking tests.J. Gen. Psychol., 83: 79–86.
Izawa, K. 1975. Foods and feeding behavior of monkeys in the upper Amazon basin.Primates, 16: 295–316.
Jolly, A. 1985. Food and feeding. In:The Evolution of Primate Behavior,Jolly,A. (ed.), MacMillan, New York, pp. 45–71.
Kare, M. R. 1971. Comparative study of taste. In:Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. 4, Part 2,Beidler,L. M. (ed.), Springer, Berlin, pp. 278–292.
Kare, M. R.;Brand, J. G. (eds.) 1986,Interaction of the Chemical Senses with Nutrition, Academic Press, New York.
Kinghorn, A. D.;Soejarto, D. D. 1986. Sweetening agents of plant origin.CRC Critical Reviews in Plant Science, 4: 79–120.
Laska, M. 1996. Taste preference thresholds for food-associated sugars in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus).Primates, 37: 93–97.
Laska, M. 1997. Taste preferences for five food-associated sugars in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus).J. Chem. Ecol., 23: 659–672.
Laska, M.;Carrera Sanchez, E.;Rodriguez Luna, E. 1996. Gustatory thresholds for food-associated sugars in the spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi).Amer. J. Primatol., 39: 189–193.
MacKinnon, J. R.;MacKinnon, K. S. 1980. Niche differentiation in a primate community. In:Malayan Forest Primates,Chivers,D. J. (ed.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 167–190.
Maller, O. 1973. Quality and intensity of sugar solutions as determinants of ingestion by the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta).Folia Primatol., 20: 72–77.
Maller, O.;Kare, M. R. 1967. Observations on the sense of taste in the armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus).Anim. Behav., 15: 8–10.
Moskowitz, H. R. 1971. The sweetness and pleasantness of sugars.Amer. J. Psychol., 84: 387–405.
Nagy, S.;Shaw, P. E. (eds.) 1980.Tropical and Subtropical Fruits: Composition, Nutritive Values, Properties and Uses. Avi Publ. Westport, Connecticut.
Pangborn, R. M. 1963. Relative taste intensities of selected sugars and organic acids.J. Food Sci., 28: 726–733.
Pfaffman, C. 1977. Biological and behavioral substrates of the sweet tooth. In:Taste and Development: The Genesis of Sweet Preference,Weiffenbach,J. M. (ed.), U. S. Gov. Print. Off., Washington, pp. 3–24.
Pfaffman, C.;Bartoshuk, L. M. 1971. Taste psychophysics. In:Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. 4, Part 2,Beidler,L. M. (ed.), Springer, Berlin, pp. 75–101.
Richter, C. P.;Campbell, K. H. 1940. Taste thresholds and taste preferences of rats for five common sugars.J. Nutr., 20: 31–46.
Sclafani, A.;Mann, S. 1987. Carbohydrate taste preferences in rats: glucose, sucrose, maltose, fructose and polycose compared.Physiol. Behav., 40: 563–568.
Scott, T. R. 1990. The effect of physiological need on taste. In:Taste, Experience and Feeding,Capaldi,E. D.;Powley,T. L. (eds.), American Psychological Association, Washington, pp. 45–61.
Simmen, B.;Hladik, C. M. 1993. Perception gustative et adaptation a l'environnement nutritionnel des primates non-humains et des populations humaines.Bull. Mem. Soc. Anthropol. Paris, 5: 353–354.
Sunderland, G.;Sclafani, A. 1988. Taste preferences of squirrel monkeys and bonnet macaques for polycose, maltose and sucrose.Physiol. Behav., 43: 685–690.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Laska, M., Sanchez, E.C. & Luna, E.R. Relative taste preferences for food-associated sugars in the spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi). Primates 39, 91–96 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557747
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557747