Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

National estimates of mortality rates for radical pancreaticoduodenectomy in 25,000 patients

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Recent publications suggest an inverse relationship between mortality rates in the Whipple procedure for periampullary cancer and hospital volume/teaching status.

Methods

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 1988 to 1995, containing 24,926 patients undergoing pancreatectomy for periampullary cancer, was used.

Results

The mean number of procedures per hospital per year was 1.5, and the overall mortality was 14%. The volume of procedures per year increased from the rural to the urban nonteaching hospitals to the urban teaching hospitals (.6, 1.1, and 2.7, respectively), with a steady decrease in mortality among the three hospital types (18%, 15%, and 11%). A multiple logistic regression model with mortality odds ratios (ORs) showed that male sex (OR, 1.3), increasing age (OR, 1.6 to 6.7 in decades from 50 to≥80 vs.<50 years), emergency admission (OR, 1.5), and hospital volume (less than one vs. one or more cases per year; OR, 1.5) were significantly predictive for increased in-hospital mortality.

Conclusions

In-hospital mortality in the low-volume hospital setting is prohibitive, and review of each institution's mortality rates must occur before these procedures are performed in those institutions. In addition, patients over the age of 60 years, male patients, and those with an urgent admission are at a significant risk of in-hospital death, and consideration should be given toward transfer to an experienced institution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Thomas A, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2002.CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:23–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA. Periampullary adenocarcinoma: analysis of 5-year survivors.Ann Surg 1998;227: 821–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bouvet M, Gamagami RA, Gilpin EA, et al. Factors influencing survival after resection for periampullary neoplasms.Am J Surg 2000;180:13–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Conlon KC, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF. Long-term survival after curative resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: clinicopathologic analysis of 5-year survivors.Ann Surg 1996;223:273–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nitecki SS, Sarr MG, Colby TV, van Heerden JA. Long-term survival after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: is it really improving?Ann Surg 1995;221:59–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gouma DJ, van Geenen RCI, van Gulik TM, et al. Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume.Ann Surg 2000;232:786–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Simunovic M, To T, Theriault M, Langer B. Relation between hospital surgical volume and outcome for pancreatic resection for neoplasm in a publicly funded health care system.Can Med Assoc J 1999;160:643–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Neoptolemos JP, Russell RCG, Bramhall S, Theis B. Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1026 patients: UK survey of specialist pancreatic units.Br J Surg 1997;84:1370–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dudley RA, Johansen KL, Brand R, Rennie DJ, Milstein A. Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths.JAMA 2000;283:1159–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson SRG, Tosteson ANA, Sharp SM, Warshaw AL, Fisher ES. Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality with pancreaticoduodenectomy.Surgery 1999;125:250–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery.JAMA 1998;280:1747–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Gordon TA, et al. Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer.Ann Surg 1998;228:429–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gordon TA, Bowman HM, Tielsch JM, Bass EB, Burleyson GP, Cameron JL. Statewide regionalization of pancreaticoduodenectomy and its effect on in-hospital mortality.Ann Surg 1998;228: 71–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lieberman MD, Kilburn H, Lindsey M, Brennan MF. Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy.Ann Surg 1995;222:638–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stokes ME, Davis CS, Koch GG.Categorical Data Analysis Using the SAS System. 2nd ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionzalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality.N Engl J Med 1979;301:1364–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McGrath PD, Wennberg DE, Dickens JD, et al. Relation between operator and hospital volume and outcomes following percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of coronary stent.JAMA 2000;284:3139–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Magid DJ, Calonge BN, Rumsfeld JS, et al. Relation between hospital primary angioplasty volume and mortality for patients with acute MI treated with primary angioplasty vs thrombolytic therapy.JAMA 2000;284:3131–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schrag D, Cramer LD, Bach PB, Cohen AM, Warren JL, Begg CB. Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer.JAMA 2000;284:3028–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Harmon JW, Tang DG, Gordon TA, et al. Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection.Ann Surg 1999;230:404–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hillner BE, Smith TJ, Desch CE. Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care.J Clin Oncol 2000;18:2327–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Howard JM. Pancreatico-duodenectomy. Forty-one consecutive Whipple resections without an operative mortality.Ann Surg 1968); 168:629–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Trede M, Schwall G, Saeger HD. Survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy: 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality.Ann Surg 1990;211:447–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Kaufman HS, Coleman J. One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality.Ann Surg 1993;217:430–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schwarz RE, Keny H, Ellenhorn JDI. A mortality-free decade of pancreatoduodenectomy: is quality independent of quantity?Am Surg 1999;85:949–54.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hutter MM, Glasgow RE, Mulvihill SJ. Does the participation of a surgical trainee adversely impact patient outcomes? A study of major pancreatic resections in California.Surgery 2000;128:286–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Janes RH, Niederhuber JE, Chmiel JS, et al. National patterns of care for pancreatic cancer: results of a survey by the Commission on Cancer.Ann Surg 1996;223:261–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rios G, Conrad A, Cole D, et al. Trends in indications and outcomes in the Whipple procedure over a 40-year period.Am Surg 1999;65:889–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Birkmeyer JD, Warshaw AL, Finlayson SRG, Grove MR, Tosteson ANA. Relationship between hospital volume and late survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy.Surgery 1999;126:178–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hannan EL, O'Donnell JF, Kilburn H, Bernard HR, Yazici A. Investigation of the relationship between volume and mortality for surgical procedures performed in New York state hospitals.JAMA 1989;262:503–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Coastal Area Health Education Center, PO Box 9025, 28402-9025, Wilmington, NC

    Cyrus A. Kotwall MD, J. Gary Maxwell MD & Carda C. Brinker BS

  2. New Hanover Health Network, Wilmington, North Carolina

    Cyrus A. Kotwall MD & J. Gary Maxwell MD

  3. University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

    Cyrus A. Kotwall MD, J. Gary Maxwell MD, Gary G. Koch PhD & Deborah L. Covington DrPH

Authors
  1. Cyrus A. Kotwall MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Gary Maxwell MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carda C. Brinker BS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gary G. Koch PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Deborah L. Covington DrPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cyrus A. Kotwall MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kotwall, C.A., Maxwell, J.G., Brinker, C.C. et al. National estimates of mortality rates for radical pancreaticoduodenectomy in 25,000 patients. Annals of Surgical Oncology 9, 847–854 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557520

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557520

Key Words

Search

Navigation