Skip to main content
Log in

Differentiation of osteoid-producing cellsin vitro: Possible evidence for the requirement of a microenvironment

  • Laboratory Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Periostea were dissected from 17-day-old chicken embryo calvariae, placed on millipore filters, and cultured on fluid media containing serum or on serum and plasma containing “plasma clots,” in three ways: 1) with the osteogenic layer facing the filter, 2) with the osteogenic layer away from the filter, 3) folded such that the osteogenic layer was in apposition with itself within the fold. The cultures were studied histologically as well as biochemically. Periostea that were cultured folded showed differentiation of osteoblastlike cells after 2 days, and production of osteoid at day 4. Tissues cultured with the osteogenic layer away from the filter demonstrated similar osteoblastic differentiation and osteoid production. Both types of cultures exhibited an increase in histochemically detectable alkaline phosphatase activity over the 4 day culture period that was associated with osteoblasts and the osteogenic area. Periostea cultured with the osteogenic layer facing the filter produced no osteoid. In these cultures, histochemically detectable alkaline phosphatase activity decreased and virtually disappeared over the 4 day culture period. The possibility that the creation of a suitable micro-environment is required for osteodifferentiation in this culture system is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fell HB (1932) The osteogenic capacity in vitro of periosteum and endosteum isolated from the limb skeleton of fowl embryos and young chicks. Anatomy LXVI, pp 11–180

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gaillard PJ (1934) Development changes in the composition of the body fluids in relation to growth and differentiation of tissue cultures. Protoplasma XXIII, pp 145–174

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fitton-Jackson S, Smith RH (1957) Studies on the biosynthesis of collagen. J Biophys Biochem Cyto 3:897–911

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldhaber P (1966) Remodelling of bone in tissue culture. J Dent Res 45:490–499

    Google Scholar 

  5. Binderman I, Duksin O, Harrell A, Katzir E, Sachs L (1964) Formation of bone tissue in culture from isolated bone cells. J Cell Biol 61:427–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Marvaso V, Bernard GW (1977) Initial intramembraneous osteogenesis in vitro. Am J Anat 149:453–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Raisz LG, Dietrich JW, Canalis EM (1976) Factors influencing bone formation in organ culture. Isr J Med Sci 12:108–114

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brighton CT, Fox JL, Seltzer D (1976) In vitro growth of bone and cartilage from rat periosteum under various oxygen tensions (Abstract). 22nd Annual ORS, January 28–30, p 51

  9. Osdoby P, Caplan AI (1979) Osteogenesis in cultures of limb mesenchymal cells. Dev Biol 73:84–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nijweide P, Van der Plas A (1975) Studies on the uptake of calcium and strontium by isolated periosteal cells. Proc Kon Ned Akad Wet C78:418–434

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tenenbaum HC, Heersche JNM (1982) Differentiation of osteoblasts and production of mineralized bone in vitro. Calcif Tissue Int 34:76–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Paul J (1975) Cell and tissue culture, 5th ed. Churchill-Livingston, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Burstone MS (1960) Enzymes in dentinogenesis and osteogenesis: calcification in biological systems. AAAS, Symposium Publication, Washington, pp 225–227

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Slater CR (1976) Control of myogenesis in vitro by chick embryo extract. Dev Biol 50:264–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Linkhart TA, Glegg CH, Hauschka SD (1981) Myogenic differentiation in permanent clonal mouse myoblast cell lines: regulation by macromolecular growth factor in the culture medium. Dev Biol 66:19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Burger EH, Gribnau JD, Thesingh CW (1981) Initiation of bone formation and resorption in vitro: effects of oxygen tension and medium pH. Cell Biol Int Rep 5(8):764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tenenbaum HC, Smith I, Heersche JNM (1983) Differentiation of osteoid producing cells in vitro: evidence for the requirement of a microenvironment. ASBMR 5th Annual Scientific Meeting (Abstract A15)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tenenbaum, H.C., Heersche, J.N.M. Differentiation of osteoid-producing cellsin vitro: Possible evidence for the requirement of a microenvironment. Calcif Tissue Int 38, 262–267 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556604

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556604

Key words

Navigation