Skip to main content
Log in

Deterring bone loss by exercise intervention in premenopausal and postmenopausal women

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This study investigated the efficacy of 4 years of exercise intervention in deterring bone loss in middle-aged women, and is a correction and extension of previously published data. Sixty-two control subjects (mean age 50.8) and 80 exercise subjects (mean age 50.1) completed a 4-year study. Subjects exercised three times a week, 45 minutes per session. Bilateral radius, ulna, and humerus bone mineral content (BMC) and width (W) were measured on each subject 11 times over the 4-year period. The two groups did not differ initially in age, height, or weight, but the control group had a greater maximum VO2 (ml/kg/min) than the exercise group. Slopes and intercepts of the bone variables vs. time were determined for each subject, and these values were used for between-group comparisons of loss. The control group BMC and BMC/W declined significantly in all three bones in both arms. The exercise group rate of decline was significantly less than that of the control group for 12 of the 18 bone variables. The greatest effect of the exercise intervention was on the ulna and radius. Exercise subjects lost significantly less than control subjects in left and right ulna and radius BMC and BMC/W, and left ulna and radius W. Lesser differences between groups were observed in the humerus. BMC and W loss rates of the left humerus were reduced in the exercise group, with no difference between exercise and control subjects in the other humerus variables. To determine if menopausal status influenced the response to exercise, we analyzed the difference between groups for premenopausal and postmenopausal subjects separately. Regardless of menopausal status, exercise subjects had lower bone loss rates than control subjects. In both premenopausal and postmenopausal subjects, exercise reduced bone loss significantly for 10 of the 18 bone variables. It can be concluded that physical activity significantly reduces bone loss in the arms of middle-aged women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Institute of Health (1984) Consensus Development Conference on Osteoporosis vol 5, No 3

  2. Smith MC, Rambaut PC, Vogel JM, Whittle MW (1977) Bone mineral measurement—experiment M078. In: Johnston RS, Dietlein LF (eds) Biomedical results from skylab. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, pp 183–190

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vogel JM, Whittle MW (1976) Bone mineral changes: the second manned skylab mission. Aviat Space Environ Med 47:396–400

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Donaldson CL, Hulley SB, Vogel JM, Hattner RS Bayers JH, McMillan DE (1970) Effect of prolonged bedrest on bone mineral. Metabolism 19:1071–1084

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE, (1984) Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. J Bone Joint Surg 66a:397–402

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lanyon LE, Rubin CT (1984) Static vs. dynamic loads as a stimulus for bone remodeling. J Biomech 15:767–781

    Google Scholar 

  7. Krolner B, Toft B, Nielsen SP, Tondevold E (1983) Physical exercise as prophylaxis against involutional vertebral bone loss: a controlled trial. Clin Sci 64:541–546

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Aloia JF, Cohn SH, Ostuni JA, Cane R, Ellis K (1978) Prevention of involutional bone loss by exercise. Ann Intern Med 89:356–358

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith EL, Reddan W, Smith PE (1981) Physical activity and calcium modalities for bone mineral increase in aged women. Med Sci Sports Exer 13(1):60–64

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith EL, Smith PE, Ensign CJ, Shea MM (1984) Bone involution decrease in exercising middle-aged women. Calcif Tissue Int 36:S129-S138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oldridge NB (1982) Compliance with intervention and rehabilitation exercise programs—a review. Prev Med 11:56–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Balke B, Ware RW (1959) An experimental study of physical fitness of Air Force personnel. US Armed Forces Med J 10:675–688

    Google Scholar 

  13. American College of Sports Medicine (1980) Guidelines for graded exercise testing and exercise prescription, 2nd ed. Lea and Fabiger, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sempos CT, Johnson NE, Smith EL, Gilligan C (1984) A two-year dietary survey of middle-aged women: repeated dietary records as a measure of usual intake. J Am Diet Assoc 84:1008–1013

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Karvonen MJ (1957) The effects of training on heart rate. A longitudinal study. Ann Med Exp Biol Fenn 35:307–315

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. White MK, Martin RB, Yeater RA, Butcher RL, Radin EL (1984) The effects of exercise on the bones of postmenopausal women. Int Orthopaedics 7:209–214

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, E.L., Gilligan, C., McAdam, M. et al. Deterring bone loss by exercise intervention in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 44, 312–321 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556310

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556310

Key words

Navigation