Abstract
Sixteen patients underwent anterior resection and coloanal anastomosis between October 1984 and September 1987. Indications included adenocarcinoma of the low rectum in 9, villous tumor in 2, carcinoid tumor in 1, radiation proctitis in 1, adult onset Hirschprung's disease in 1, rectourethral fistula in 1, and megarectum in 1. There was no in-hospital mortality and no anastomotic dehiscence. The Kirwan classification was used to evaluate functional results. Ninety-three percent of patients expressed satisfaction with their surgical results. Eighty-seven percent of patients are normally continent. A single patient is grossly incontinent. Eight of nine patients with carcinoma were resected for cure. A single patient has died of an unrelated disorder and the remaning seven are free of disease at an average follow-up of 24 months. The authors conclude that coloanal anastomosis is a safe procedure accompanied by minimal morbidity, or risk of local recurrence. Excellent, or at least acceptable, continence can be anticipated in the majortty of carefully selected patients. The coloanal anastomosis should be strongly considered in any patient with a lowlying rectal lesion in whom body habitus precludes the possibility of conventional low anterior resection.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Parks AG. Transanal technique in low rectal anastomosis. Proc R Soc Med 1973;65:975–6.
Parks AG, Percy JP. Resection and sutured coloanal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1982;69:301–4.
Drake DB, Pemberton JH, Beart RW, Dozois RR, Wolff BG. Coloanal anastomosis in the management of benign and malignant rectal disease. Ann Surg 1987;206:600–5.
Williams NS, Dixon MF, Johnston D. Reappraisal of the 5 centimetre rule of distal excision for carcinoma of the rectum: a study of distal intramural spread and of patients' survival. Br J Surg 1983;70:150–4.
Pollett WG, Nicholls RG. The relationship between the extent of distal clearance and survival and local recurrence rates after curative anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg 1983;198:159–63.
Hochenegg J. Die sak rale Methode der Extirpation von Mastdam krebsen nach Prof Kraske. Wien Klin Wochenschr 1888;1:254; 272;290;309;324;348.
Maunsell HW. A new method of excising the two upper portions of the rectum and the lower segment of the sigmoid flexure of the colon. Lancet 1892;2:473–6.
Weir RF. An improved method of treating high-seated cancers of the rectum. JAMA 1901;37:801–3.
Babcock WW. Experiences with resection of the colon and the elimination of colostomy. Am J Surg 1939;46:186–203.
Bacon HE. Evolution of sphincter muscle preservation and reestablishment of continuity in the operative treatment of rectal and sigmoidal cancer. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1945;81:113–27.
Black BM. Combined abdomino-endo-rectal resection: technical aspects and indications. Arch Surg 1952;65:406–16.
Cutait DE, Figlioni FJ. A new method of colorectal anastomosis in abdominoperineal resection. Dis Col Rectum 1961;4:335–42.
Turnbull RB Jr, Cuthbertson AM. Abdomino-rectal pullthrough resection for cancer and for Hirschsprung's disease. Cleveland Clin Q 1961;28:109–15.
Jones PF, Thomson HJ. Long term results of a consistent policy of sphincter preservation in the treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1982;69:564–8.
Williams NS, Durdey P, Johnston D. The outcome following sphincter saving resection and abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1985;72:595–8.
Tagart RE. Restorative rectal resection: an audit of 220 cases. Br J Surg 1986;73:70–1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Vernava, A.M., Robbins, P.L. & Brabbee, G.W. Restorative resection: Coloanal anastomosis for benign and malignant disease. Dis Colon Rectum 32, 690–693 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02555775
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02555775