Skip to main content
Log in

A randomized comparison of single and multiple rubber band ligations

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

One hundred consecutive office patients with internal hemorrhoidal disease were treated by rubber band ligations. They were assigned randomly to one, two, or three ligations at one session. No statistically significant differences in morbidity or complications resulted from multiple ligations, as compared with one ligation. No serious complications were encountered in any of the treatment groups. These results confirm that multiple rubber band ligation is as safe and effective a procedure for managing internal hemorrhoidal disease as single ligations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khubchandani IT, Trimpi HC, Sheets JA. Closed hemorrhoidectomy with local anesthesia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1972;135:955–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blaisdell PC. Prevention of massive hemorrhage secondary to hemorrhoidectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1958;106:485–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barron J. Office ligation of internal hemorrhoids. Am J Surg 1963;105:563–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barron J. Office ligations treatment of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1963;6:109–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Groves AR, Evans JC, Alexander-Williams J. Management of internal haemorrhoids by rubber band ligation. Br J Surg 1971;58:923–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Steinberg DM, Liegois H, Alexander-Williams J. Long term review of results of rubber band ligation of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1975;62:144–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wrobleski DE, Corman M, Veidenheimer MC, Coller JA. Longterm evaluation of rubber ring ligation in hemorrhoidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:478–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Keighley MRB, Buchman P, Minervini S, Arabi Y, Alexander-Williams J. Prospective trials of minor surgical procedures and high-fibre diet for haemorrhoids. Br Med Jr 1979;2:967–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Murie JA, MacKenzie I, Sim AJW. Comparison of rubber band ligation and haemorrhoidectomy for second-and third-degree haemorrhoids: a prospective clinical trial. Br Jr Surg 1980; 67:786–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Murie JA, Sim AJW, MacKenzie I. Rubber band ligation versus haemorrhoidectomy for prolapsing haemorrhoids: a long term prospective clinical trial. Br Jr Surg 1982;69:536–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lau WY, Chow HP, Poon GP, Wong SH. Rubber band ligation of three primary hemorrhoids in a single session. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:336–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Salvati EP. Symposium: anorectal surgery—hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:211–22.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shub HA. Hemorrhoidal banding (letter to the editor). Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:411.

    Google Scholar 

  14. O'Hara VS. Fatal clostridial infection following hemorrhoidal banding. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:570–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McGivney J. Hemorrhoidal banding (letter to the editor). Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:577.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Khubachandani, I.T. A randomized comparison of single and multiple rubber band ligations. Dis Colon Rectum 26, 705–708 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554977

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554977

Key words

Navigation